All confirmed Civ 6 leaders so fat

They finally try unusual leaders and this is what we get. I don't think France's is even French.

You're missing Monty.

>I don't think France's is even French.
She was italian yeah, but she was one the most powerful women through France history. As a queen and later as a regent she had a huge influence in the kingdom, it's probably why they picked her (and because they wanted more female ruler I imagine).
I would've liked the french ruler to be Philip II or another one more relevant than her.

>cleopatra
>whiter than a fucking finn in winter

She was Makedonian, after all

>no Alberto Barbosa
Dropped

Catherine de Who? France has had like hundreds of well known leaders they could have chosen. Or am I just not well versed in french history and she's more important than others?

>playing this game BEFORE the millions of DLCs are released

One of the most important French female leader in French History. But honestly, they just wanted to pick a woman.

How do you go from this...

...to this?

eww

>Not Spain so far
Triggering

By doing research

>roosevelt

fug yeah

Why leader looks uglier than Civ 5?
Uglinization?

>mfw the leader of egypt is greek and the leader of france is italian

A more cartoonish style overall.

Why are they all so damn ugly? The character designer should be fired.

WE

this how it be

The Civ 5 style looks Epic, even cartoonish Civ 4 style somehow look better.

A shame Civ5 is shit.

Game mechanic kinda bad, but after some DLC kinda make it more enjoyable. (Still no unit stacks).
And Civ 6 gonna keep that with worse style.

damn all female line up. if they fucking chose roxelana over mehmet the conqueror or selim the stern just because muh feminism, i will fucking cry.

>getting Civ VI on release day

>because they wanted more female ruler I imagine
Wasn't Joan of Arc her predecessor? Why even change? It's not like they've ever given a shit about history anyway.

>mehmet

By watching Rome I assume.
It seems too much of a coincidence that she looks just like Lyndsey Marshal now.

>Philippe Auguste, Louis IX, Charles VII or Louis XIII will never represent France

>even cartoonish Civ 4 style somehow look better.
"no"

...

>Jadwiga

'literally who' person from a 'literally who' country
I would replace it with Hungary and Elizabeth Bathory 2bh

I would fuck her harder then her horses.

Gandhi was a cuck

Sure as fuck doesn't look better than this artistically.

You might think it does because you're wearing rose-tinted glasses.

>Victoria
Wouldn't Elisabeth be better?
Also Hojo is a pretty damn weird choice, what did he do aside from muh mongols? Oda was better. Or Minamoto no Yoritomo if the Sengoku guys are too controversial.

Ptolemy's were from Greece and were so inbred it'd put the Targaryens to shame 2bh. Maybe a tan but she was likely still white

>Every relevant French ruler is actually Italian

>tfw you will never bang a queen as beautiful as her

From left to right
>a fucking teddy bear
>a fucking kung fu panda
>a fucking disney princess
>a fucking disney prince
>a fucking disney queen
>a fucking
>CARTOON
>A
>R
>T
>O
>O
>N

Medicis was half-French

are you greek?

That's why I say somehow Civ 4 style look better.
Because they are beautiful at cartoonization, this not.
Half breed cartoon and realistic is bad, nor cartoon neither realistic.

Nobody cares about your opinion.

Victoria looking rather slim there

>Half breed cartoon and realistic is bad, nor cartoon neither realistic.
The fuck does this even mean? How can you be half realistic and half cartoon? Do you even know what a cartoon is?

Art style is horrible.

Joan never ruled.

>Robespierre, Léon Blum or Lamartine will never represent France

>Joan never ruled.
No I meant in Civ. I remember her being in one of the games.

>Leon Blum

ew wtf man?

>a fucking user image board
>posts "nobody cares about your opinion"
OH BOY IT SURE IS FUCKING HOT THESE DAYS AMIRITE?

Les congés payés, le front populaire, sacrebleu

The civ 5 style look 75% realistic and 25% cartoon.
Civ 4 look 80% cartoon and 20% realistic.
Civ 6 look half of it. But what i really care about is that some Civilization chracters looks like make from clay.
Look at Victoria and some clay cartoon.

>catherine de mecidicis

Litteraly nobody. Not even French and in fact a terrible ruler that's generally depicted as the bad guy in stories.

>Robespierre, Léon Blum, Lamartine

Are those exact or approximate numbers bub?

Try taking off the glasses and maybe you can estimate a little better. Civ 4's artstyle looks like something a 4th grade child would draw at this point.

Meh, we got stuck with Montezuma II, Ilhuicamina would make much more sense and personally I'd rather see Cuahtemoc or Nezahualcoyotl...

Th really cool thing would be to have Malintzin, as not only would we get a female ruler her history could allow her to switch Aztecs into Mexicans after a certain point in development, would be pretty cool to have Mexican revolucionarios as cavalry units...

>Républicain
>Socialiste

>Léon Blum

"""you""" are not an """I"""
"""you""" are a cockroach.

>tfw Israel will never be in it
>tfw no King David

>Royaliste
>En l'an de grâce 2016

I am Greek.

Because it's fit the Cartoon.
It's obvious that the Civ 6 style obviously beautiful than Civ 4 style, but beautiful doesn't make it look better.

>kike
>socialist
>cut down military spending
>let Germany rearm
Yeah ok you get your good goy points

>aimer un criminel révolutionnaire, une socialope et un poète

>Catherine de Medici for France

Seriously i know she was important and powerful at a time. But the only reason i could think she is in this game is because she is a woman, and they need to get their strong women quota up.

There are a dozen of French personalities which would deserve to be at her place

It's literally just a higher quality version of civ 4's graphics. You like Civ 4's because the image itself fills you with reactionary enjoyment because it's an old game you enjoyed.

The same reason why people clingy to old designs of nintendo characters. They are objectively worse looking but they have a reactionary boost of dopamine attached to them so people like them more.

>US at all
>Still no Meiji
>Non-numbered Cleopatra
>That idiotic cartoony style

Why can't they just release third add-on to Civ V or something? The nation rooster on second one was so fucking idiotic.

I mean why "Morocco" when you can have Berbers? Why the fuck is Indonesia a thing even? Having it next to Poland looks cringe at best.

Are you sure they're not going to add Italy with Medici?
Who?

>Philippe II Auguste who invented modern France
>Saint-Louis the IXth who brought modern justice, pacified the country and was a great crusader
>Philippe IV le Bel, a machiavellian politician who managed to crush any international enemy, including the Pope
>Charles VII who freed France from the English dominance, and invented a modern army and a modern tax system
>Louis XI, a spy and chessmaster
>Louis XIV, the fucking Sun-King
>Napoléon Bonaparte
>Charles de Gaulle

>Firaxis instead chooses a random italian woman who lost all relevance once Henri IV came to power

Just encule my shit up mon ami.

RICHELIEU WAS NOT A KING, BUT HE DESERVES TO REPRESENT US

They are trying with the unknown figures, I'd guess.

The only civ 4 images that i even remember is Abraham Lincoln adopt slavery.
The reason i like civ 4 more because civ 6 look like make from clay, it's bothering me that a "realistic cartoon" attempt make a character that's so smooth at some place and suddenly rough at some place which not look fit than a cartoon or nearly realistic
But well because our opinion at seeing thing different, so we never come to a conclusion anyway.

CTP had Eleonora de Aquitane

Fitting, same for some older date leader say Aethefleda for England

I love how they force equal quota for fem leaders, but nothing aside spy unit/civ III leader units or advisaries was even female

AoE2 had peasants and joan, what about them? there were women working, even in warfare. Why not presents it there too like - was it paradox or total war DLC?

hnnnnnng how can white orc girls even compete?

Looks more like skin than it does clay. What you seem to miss is the jaggies from Civ 4

Like Cleopatra for Egypt. Seriously, all she did was to bed Roman generals.

>CTP had Eleonora de Aquitane
But she fought against France. Wtf.

>Eleonora de Aquitane

Even worse.
She was quite cool, but she literally betrayed France and laid the fundaments for the first hundred years war

Nigga, i like Civ 5 style more.

they look like fucking disney characters

But at least she was qt as fuck desu

Might aswell take Blanche de Castille, they both arent really relevant but she's much more known than Catherine.

>Are you sure they're not going to add Italy with Medici?
They'd be adding Florence if anything.

>that XIXth Century sabre
>that XIIIth Century écu

Disgusting

They should left Isabel of Castille for Spain if they want a female leader so bad.
At least it's really an important female ruler and we wouldn't end up with shit like catherine of Medici

>not focusing on the qt instead of what she's holding

Civ V Catherine was best take on her, but honestly I'd rather see St. Alexander Nevsky or Ivan IV the Fearful

The stuff like Okhrana, Cheka and others had it's beginning in his Oprichnina.

Why the hell not St. Hedwig, Jadwiga?
She wasn't even fucking Polish, but Hungarian Angevin.

Here's what I want to see:
Mix of 3/4/5 (I liked 3 the most), GRAPHICAL STYLE WISE ESP!
EGYPTIANS SPEAKING COPTIC!!! FUCK OFF MASRI AREP INFLOW
Less Eurocentrism, equal representation for East Europe (I mean the proper one, not some yugoshits or vlachs, for those is Byzantine and Romans), why the fuck not Hungary?
What is the fucking point of post-colonials? I mean US and Brazil? Having fucking South Africa would make more sense, and having anything later than Washington looks odd at best.
I hate the "wildcard" shit like Indonesia, Shoshones, Morocco and other shit. It completely fails the concept and was as alien as "HRE" (Mediaeval Germany, Found by Franks-then-French, see Charlemagne was "Great Man" of French in Civ3) to the thing. Puebloans were supposed to be included, in general we need more American (Native) and African (non-primitive) nations. Say Nubians, or hell even get proper Berbers. Either Rifian leader or Tashafin, but i'd be best to split islam into 3 and get the Khajidrite uprising leader, Shia for whoever would fit if Zoroastrianism is still included (historically Masri Arabs were Shia).
Now you had such shit as in Civ IV St. Justinian sang "Deus Judex Justus", whilst units spoke "Latin-influenced mediaeval Greek", yet in Civ V St. Theodora THE FUCKING NATIVE LATIN SPEAKER spoke Mediaeval Greek, what the fuark srsly? And why Persian leaders spoke Aramaic rather than Farsi, Parsi, Persian (Civ IV) when you had Ashurbanipal speak Akkadian rathet han Assyrian Aramaic? This just makes no sense whatsoever.
They found people speaking Sumerian, but couldn't find anyone to find Coptic?Y 3 nations speak Arabic, ther is generic Arabciv

>full plate harness
>nice two-handed sword

This pic is much better and much accurate

>Scottish Claymore with a shitty fleur de lis on it

Disgusting

how's this one
>tfw it's the last of my qt joan darc pic collection

They're trying too hard to use women leaders

Isabella of Castille is probably who it's supposed to be, they just used the wrong image.

>they will never split up india or give it a ruler other than Gandhi because he is a meme

KEK both of france's biggest most influencial people are italian

Really makes you think

>no russia
dropped

>There are a dozen of French personalities which would deserve to be at her place
Fucking this

>and in fact a terrible ruler
That's absolutely false. What she did with Michel de l'Hospital (probably one of the greatest Frenchman in History) was absolutely capital for the later advent of centralized and strong monarchy.

>in stories
In bad fiction maybe, in History not so much.
Daily reminder that Dumas is a mediocre writer and a terrible historical source

You're my man, my man.

The absolute best 2bh

Shoshones were replacement of Puebloans and this was honestly only point of their inclusion, as most people have never heard of them whatsoever even.

I am surprised no modders as so far have undone this, we have no idea what their leader speaks even

it'd be nice if they returned to Civ 3 fighting style, I liked CTP one if it had more control (also public works was nice idea, but as an alternative),

Most of the "new civs" are straight copied outta CTP/2. I wonder when we'd get Phoenicians proper?

Spying system from IV was better (but WAY TOO LATELY, what about arabic assassins, ninjas, sicarii? I can totally imagine Nizar leading Arabs as Shia), V would works more as a counter-service

the religion in V was horrible, it was chimp over who would discover Xtianity first. Yet there are no Nestorians or Monophysites, who arguably deserved the spot more than Protestants. "Eastern Orthodox", but not "Roman Catholic", etc.
Those faiths would fit for Assyrians and Egyptians, even Ethiopians and Babylonians (I recall one had islam other zoroastrianism)
Surprised Jainism didn't made it into the spot, neither some forms of Gnosticism
Haven't checked CTP Appolyon complete mod, but Civ IV had the religion done best, capturing holy city should make you owner of religion, but it worked just idiotic

Now Civ II/IV had double leaders, but when you try to return to this in V - You must gave them unique skills, unique units and buildings, why this doesn't depend on nation? You had Napoleon with Ancien Regime, so I mean come on it shou;d't be like that
civics and nation traits from IV/III would make sense more