/ntr/ - Netrunner official Sup Forums browser

We are making a web browser!
PREVIOUSLY: >In the face of recent changes in Firefox and Chrome some anons were asking for a Sup Forums's perfect web browser, we collected the most wanted here and plan on continuing with the creation.

To contribute follow the WORK PLAN, join the IRC to ask developers for a repo, and get to programming!
IRC on Rizon: #Sup Forumsnetrunner

Website: netrunner.cc/
Youtube: youtube.com/channel/UCes2uiC-4xSBwqnldCFbh4Q
Twitter: twitter.com/Team_NetRunner
Gitgud: gitgud.io/odilitime/netrunner/
Teknik: git.teknik.io/gyroninja/netrunner

>WORK PLAN
Look at the features list and implement them, ask what is currently being worked on if you don't know.
FEATURES pastebin.com/bnUU6kcu
FAQ pastebin.com/gjp7QmQJ

Other urls found in this thread:

github.com/nEXT-Browser/nEXT
pastebin.com/bnUU6kcu
minbrowser.github.io/min/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

please don't let this one die this time

someone wrote a working Lisp browser that accomplishes all the goals of this project, better, actually works, and without the memery

github.com/nEXT-Browser/nEXT

There hasn't been an update in a month, it's dead jim

bumping for interest.

>QtWebKit wrapper

bump

RIP Neetrunner

Hello everybody.

>a working Lisp browser that accomplishes all the goals of this project
Can it work on the framebuffer and is written in C/C++?

INSTALL CHROME

THIS TRASH IS VAPORWARE

Calm down buddy.

Is anyone who knows what the fuck theyre doing actually working on this or is it dead?

Man I really just want a browser called netrunner desu

I've seen devs working on this less than a week ago. Development continues but they don't make miracles, we'll have to wait.

what rendering engine does this use? javascript engine? will it be as extensible as firefox was?

why must it be written in c++?

>what rendering engine does this use?
Its own, if Odili succeed it can be used to render other kind of formats too (I hope).
>javascript engine?
They said is going to be compatible with several implementations. They been experimenting a bit on their own too, but just for testing.
>will it be as extensible as firefox was?
Much much more, read the features wishlist and get surprised.

The original idea as to have everything in C, but they went for C++ to leave it open for a future rewrite with minimum effort. This way the code is minimal and efficient.

all right, I'm invested enough to do a google search in a couple of years

kek, well memed

But you are wrong.

Why is chrome so shit? It can't do bookmarks an more than one tab kills this abomination. Pajeets at google don't know how to code.

Bump

sir do the needful and install netrunner to get rid of the virus on your computer thank you

Is electron framework also botnet, or do you really want to make own javascript engine?

Why to make HTML/JS browser, when you can just make something like universal interface and WebGTK++ an make some usefull apps in it? Really, i'm not that much browsing I couldn't do with chrome, and it would be better to have some client that loads better interface than fucking DOM

If you just want to strip off tracking something like chromium // electron framework is good core and you don't have to reinvent wheel,

Also where's the NIM guy now? Can't he make us a browser in nim faster than he says nim?

You lack leadership, this won't end up good

INSTALL NETRUNNER, greatest indian browser, from indians to indians thank you

>pastebin.com/bnUU6kcu
Can I have a feature request? It's uberfeature that needs to be done at beginning of developement because it has to do with process controll and singleton runing and shit can't be done in chrome lazy.

Why not rebase the browser on server?

>uses webkit-qt
How is this similar at all?

Is the author a NEET khv?

bump

Jesus christ, you are desperate.

this is fucking interesting...

minbrowser.github.io/min/

>c++
>code is minimal and efficient


looks like a pretty uninteresting electron app

>pretty uninteresting
try it. it's fucking genius.

no

>minbrowser.github.io/min/
fucking disgusting

shit

This project is still alive? I remember them trying g to use regex for html parsing a while ago. Funny shit.

i-ill design the l-logo!

ILL MAKE THE LOGO

very low IQ retards detected. thread abandoned.

>electron

Oh look, a browser implemented over a browser.

should be replaced with
else if (
strncnp(html[cursor + 1], "hr", 2) ||
strncnp(html[cursor + 1], "br", 2) ||
strncnp(html[cursor + 1], "wbr", 3) ||
strncnp(html[cursor + 1], "img", 3) ||
strncnp(html[cursor + 1], "link", 4) ||
strncnp(html[cursor + 1], "meta", 4) ||
strncnp(html[cursor + 1], "input", 5) ||
) {

Disgusting

Your mom?

yes, just like vivaldi and brave

That logo still looks like Moonman, Sup Forums. Better luck next time.

>NetRunner
This name is too late 90s

Why the hate? Name and logo are cool af.

I know some html css3 and html5
Can I help you guys?

Would a web browser not be the ideal use for electron?

>expecting electron haters to use their brains

>node js for the backend
>chromium for the frontend
>chromium
Why would we want a meme and a botnet anyway?

"botnet" is a meme

But user, thanks to Atom IDE we know the true power of electron, waiting 10 minutes to open.

cool. just enough to go grab a coffee in the morning when you sit down to work

nice logo

Great comeback m8.

thanks m8

Was vim bindings the next in line right?

Why use it when stuff like QupZilla or qutebrowser exist?

>qutebrowser

>implying it won't be botnet like the others

yea ok but where's the logo, faggot

>implying your mom is not a botnet

>implying we have no logo

Thank you /gd/.

Damn they roasted our art skills

Why wouldn't they just program it in Rust? It's objectively the better language

>shilling Rust
Goddamn, here too?

>Its own, if Odili succeed it can be used to render other kind of formats too (I hope).
I dream about using nr to render LaTeX on the framebuffer.

Imagine using this to power something like TexMacs.

>Why wouldn't they just program it in Rust
Why don't you stay in here

This has been advertised on other imageboards and still development is dead. Just give up already

It's a browser built on top of a browser which is also built on top of another browser. Kill yourself

You been announcing its demise since how many months now? Also your constant shitposting is very suspicious.

Niggas gonna nig

RIP Neetrunner

What?

Almost dethroned Tox as longest surviving Sup Forums project

If you want a piece of software that is (a) feature complete and (b) works properly, don't use sepples.

bump

just let it die maan

At that point you are literally redesigning Chrome on top of Chrome. Its a waste of time.

Baka, developers didn't stop.

What browsers do you guys use? FF is slowly killing all my addons but until the very end I won't let go.

FF 58

>/ntr/
That's an unfortunate acronym.

Is there a reason the developers aren't using WebKit/Blink or Gecko? Why reinvent the wheel?

>Is there a reason the developers aren't using WebKit/Blink or Gecko? Why reinvent the wheel?
because the developers are high school kids who are trying to make their first programming project and are making the most rookie of errors, picking a huge scope and thinking they can implement even basic features

just look at the 'quality' of their code and it should be obvious that they're all amateurs

i fully expect this mess to unmaintainable and abandoned soon, it won't even reach the stage of being insecure or too slow for any real applications

(a) to learn how browser engines work and how to make them and (b) this is the most lightweight thing possible, those engines mentioned by you are bloat

>thinking they can implement even basic features
what "basic features" can't they implement?
>just look at the 'quality' of their code and it should be obvious that they're all amateurs
some parts will be rewritten once in a while
>i fully expect this mess to unmaintainable and abandoned soon, it won't even reach the stage of being insecure or too slow for any real applications
it can already browse basic websites, of course it won't reach the stage of being able to display youtube or something, but it was never meant to

>what "basic features" can't they implement?
html parsing, javascript, basic css, whatever really, this thing is a nonstarter

>some parts will be rewritten once in a while
oh yeah, sure, just like they were supposed to be "rewritten" every time this thread is reposted. instead they are only expanded and made even more retarded. just look at the screenshot somebody posted earlier in this thread

>it can already browse basic websites, of course it won't reach the stage of being able to display youtube or something, but it was never meant to
"basic websites" as in it can wget text, strip tags, and display it - no style info is preserved

Get in the discord or irc. There is something for everyone. Website could do with a touch up.

>those engines mentioned by you are bloat
They're also mature software products with years of development behind them. Why not just fork one and strip out the extraneous features?

>html parsing
this is already being implemented?
>javascript
this is a very big step and I won't consider it "basic"
>basic css
will be there

>"basic websites" as in it can wget text, strip tags, and display it - no style info is preserved
this isn't happening? everything is parsed, but there is just yet so much to work on

>WebKit
Why the sudden interets on webkit? Not so long ago everybody hate it.

because of reason a

>implying ntr wasn't by purpose

how about starting off with an actual windows / linux .bat or something with an actual raster icon file attached that can launch the thing for the layman user