22.30% -> 21.90%

This is it?
AMD's market shared already topped?

Other urls found in this thread:

ycharts.com/companies/AMD/profit_margin
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

It's a measure of people doing benchmarks. After every new release there's obviously going to be a surge of people benchmarking their CPU's. keep in mind the only people buying Coffee Lake are enthusiasts, since supply is so low and there are no OEM's yet, so the people who managed to buy it are the most likely people to run the benchmark.

Can't do much with just pajeet shills and 12yo tier marketing.

>Q1 2017

Remember when there was a huge jump in AMD's "market share" on this graph post-Ryzen and they quickly "corrected" it?

You're retarded though.

they "corrected" it again, it's even smaller now than it was after the first fix

CFL has such low supply, incl. motherboards, there's very little chance it could even make a dent.

Pissmark is still trash that's got a 15% bias towards Intel, even with equivalent CPUs.

>12yo tier marketing

>pajeet shills

Last quarter Intel's desktop shipments were down 2%, first time in a decade.
Lets see how further that goes in Q3

(((passmark)))
never forget goyim

Proof? It was obviously just a bug in the software.

>>>(((a))) (((bug))) (((in))) (((the))) """(((software)))"""

Market share of a benchmark is nothing in comparison to how much lastgen e5s are selling like hotcakes now. Over 1.9 million units ordered in past 2 months. AMD isn't even competeing still.

Lastgen server CPU sales are always high when a new generation hits, because reliability and stability, only the rich companies can afford to upgrade half their infrastructure when the new hotness hits, that's why EPYC won't be making much revenue until Q2/Q1 next year unless AMD managed to throw a few million in someone's hands this early in the game.

AAhhahahahahaa, >Epyc
yeah, try putting more than two cpus on a single board and then come back with that shit.
Meanwhile intel now has servers with 224 cores and 448 threads on one machine.

1S and 2S are over 90% of the market, 4S and higher went out of style with Paxville

I'm not even sure what to say about this.

Shit, I had no idea AMD was ever that close to Intel.

just a bug goyim, don't worry about it

> Meanwhile intel now has servers with 224 cores and 448 threads on one machine.
Yeah, but they're like atom cores or something aren't they?

t. morons
It just averages the results for the given month, and in the first few hours there are so few results that things can look odd. And I'm sure there are a couple of you here that submit as soon as the clock strikes to give your team (((blue))) or (((red))) a fake lead.

AMD K8 was a magical time

oy vey

You know how people kept saying AMD is bankrupt and finished. They weren't lying.

ycharts.com/companies/AMD/profit_margin

point and case

>gone from -30% to -1%
oh wow what a nightmare, amd is surely doomed

Even if Ryzen sold insane numbers at that time, it still wouldnt have shown that big of an increase in the chart. Using percentages might be a bit hard for americlaps to fathom, but those represent HUGE numbers. It would not be possible in any realistic scenario for AMD to gain that big of a market share so fast.

(((You)))