the great debate.
The great debate
What ever works best for you.
stalled
...
whatever the fuck comes to mind lmao, the differences between them are only important if you have extreme high functioning torrent autism to the point where you have a dedicated linux box for torrents or some shit
deluge for headless server
qbittorent for your typical normie needs
qBitTorrent
aria2 > rtorrent >>>>>>>> > *
Wbittorrent fucks with my wifi adapter somehow. So yeah, it is deluge for me
I've been using Halite, and liking it, but it haven't been updated in ages, what do i move to?
>$ apt-cache show deluge
>Tag: implemented-in::python
Dropped
Upboat for qBittorrent.
Works on my machineā¢
Still no better GUI torrent client than uTorrent 2.2.1
qBitTorrent / Deluge / Tribler
I went from delu to qbit because it has search function.
On the other hand, people seem to have problems writing theese " " so I recomend them Deluge because it feels "simpler".
At least they are not using uttershit anymore.
fucking rtorrent
>deliberately posting outdated image
post an up to date one then
PicoTorrent is better.
>preferring Transmission and Halite over qBittorrent
qBitorrent is ugly. someone needs to redo the entiire UI. shame on opensource.
>Tixati
>UI slow
What?!?!?
False
This
OP go fuck yourself
...
rtorrent or aria2 for everything.
what ever can handle mame sets without crashing
I've finally moved on from utorrent 2.2.1 to qbittorrent. Congratulate me
Congratulations
STALLED
PicoTorrent
Can't prefetch metadata from magnet links
This. Only recently switched to Deluge after setting up a torrentbox. Both are basically the same aside from deluge's ability to run headless and the remote connection function in the client.
deluge-qt when?
Is Deluge still Python/Twisted-based memeware that leaks significant amounts of memory with 100+ torrents and has to be restarted every week? Because that's why I originally switched to Transmission and never went back.
>The server [at dev.deluge-torrent.org] encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.
>Please contact the server administrator at [no address given] to inform them of the time this error occurred, and the actions you performed just before this error.
Why not use transmission at that point? either way don't like featureless clients
How do you deal with, say, lack of RSS in Transmission? The lack of features is what made me pick Deluge in the first place.
Transmission has a browser head
>RSS in a torrent client
BiglyBT is the most superior one (except for RAMlets)
Are you being serious? How the fuck else do you download your shit automatically on a schedule without writing scripts?
rtorrent is dead software. Stop with this meme.
Halite vs Deluge. What should I use? Do I need to get that Combined Community Codec Pack thing for either of them? Where can I download them?
Eh? You don't need a codec pack to use a torrent client.
If you don't have one though, I'd recommend going with Shark007's codec pack.
ctrl + f > bitlord > no results
y'all are missing out
...
Deluge was slow as balls for me when I got up over 100 torrents.
Tixati or Fopnu
i use tixati but mostly i just like the color scheme and layout options
how so?
/thread
transmission on every platform.
>all these ponyfucker Tixati users ITT
Absolutely disgusting.
>needing a codec pack to do something the OS should do natively
Fucking Winshitters.
...
Deluge
>dead
>almost every seedbox provider uses it as default
Shit bait.
The description for deluge says 2nd. What a shit picture.
By using a seedbox. :^)
libtorrent-rasterbar is garbage, so neither.
flexget
Just try out BiglyBT
uTorrent 2.2.1 if windows
rtorrent if *nix
if you use anything else you are a living meme
>deluge on windows
Oni-chan, what is stupidity.
I used Deluge until it stopped working. Now I use qBittorrent.
What?
libtorrent-rakshasa or Libtransmission?
libTorrent-rakshasa is good. Transmission is good. KTorrent is good. Anything that uses libtorrent-rasterbar is trash.
But doesn't Ktorrent use libtorrent-rasterbar?
Transmission just weks