some dude invented an app (filter) that uses AI to remove makeup from photographs of females
Roasties are being blown the fuck out in real time. This is a current issue. They are literally blaming Russian hackers, despite the fact that actual 10/10 females remain 10/10
Proof (SORRY NO ARCHIVE)
buzzfeed.com
Other urls found in this thread:
twitter.com
twitter.com
>photographs of females
"females"
Can you say "women"? "females" sounds like the kind of thing a Ferengi would say.
I like how this app is only exploding in popularity because of the buttblasted roasties. If they really wanted to minimize use of this app, they would just remain silent and let it fade to obscurity. I guess roasties never fail to seize the opportunity to attention whore and virtue signal.
I'm so grateful to the internet for revealing the true nature of the average woman
tone policing isn't welcome here
TwoXChromosomes/
Shouldn't feminists love this app? It's exposing what a farce the popular image of female beauty is.
surprisingly accurate around the eyes and eyebrows
>slap a freckle filter over the face
>"AI"
THE HAGGENING HAS ARRIVED
IT'S RAPE IF YOU SEE A WOMAN'S BARE FACE WITHOUT CONSENT
NIQAB'S FOR ALL TRULY FREE WOMEN
Someone run the app on this bitch and send her a pic
how many more times are we gonna have this thread? yeah women are childish entitled retards, can we move on to something else that isn't /r9k/ garbage?
How does it affect a pic with a hijab on? I'm curious
Also does it work on gays
Holy shit they're so mad. I'm legitimately laughing.
How up in your own fucking ass do you have to be to think that someone has to "deserve" to see you without makeup?
R O A S T I E
O
A
S
T
I
E
what a luser
>says on a board with constantly 10 firefox threads
...
>if you run a filter on a photo you obviously hate women
wat
>it's fake
Disappointing, user.
I don't understand what's happening with this pic
Methinks the app doesn't work very well when it turns you into a fucking rotting flesh zombie.
In other news, water is wet...
>implying its not working correctly
Unless people started literally waking up from the death, or that chick is suffering from some flesh eating bacteria disease, I'd say it isn't.
It's not the app that turned her like that.
It's some Muslim or Indian who threw acid at her for not giving her pussy out in the name of multiculturalism.
>shes looks even better
wtf
>it's not the app
>literally says MAKEAPP in the watermark
That was the Indian/Paki trying to cover his tracks.
That Muslim is the real victim here, he was oppressed by white males for so long that it's totally understandable that he would punch up by throwing acid in a girls face, also don't be insensitive to other people's cultures you bigot, that white girl is appropriating the looks of Muslim women with acid thrown in her face.
The image has been run through the app multiple times, dinguses. Look at the watermark.
Women is a gendered term and its literally illegal to assume someone's gender you cis scum
>cis scum
Isn't it illegal to assume someone's sexuality?
The word "sexuality" triggers me, I contacted the FBI and they will arrest you.
Sometimes I'm glad I'm past 18
the original pic is one of those comparison pics of a pornstar before makeup / after makeup. Someone used the before makeup pic (when she was naturally zombie-ish) in the app which made her look even more fucked up.
he says "females" as a juvenile sign of disrespect toward women as the result of him blaming them for his lack of sex and companionship.
>complains about someone using "females" to describe women
>ignores the angry incels calling them roasties and femnazis
When all this Hollywood shit started with Weinstein, i developed some sympathy towards women for all the shit being done to them in the film industry.
Then feminists started coming out of the woodworks with their stupid inane retardation like some religious retard appearing during a disaster to scream their bullshit into everyone's ears, and all of my sympathy evaporated to be replaced with annoyance.
Gotta start somewhere. And I've actually never heard the term "roasties" before.
You do sometimes wonder if the average age on this board is 12.
95% of those women "coming out" are just attention whores that simply want a piece of the lawsuit settlement pie. You ever wondered why women only do shit like this in groups? Same reason why women all do what trendy shit the rest of their friend circle is doing, for attention.
The difference is we cover our females in clothing.
It is disgusting really. If they wear clothes, they can have pockets and if they have pockets they can have profit.
tay is still a cutie
In that case, it looks like you are below average.
>And I've actually never heard the term "roasties" before
You're an actual kid aren't you?
>correct term in the new thundercunt totalitarian regime is "female organisms"
She looks better on the right.
>they think roasties is a commonly used term
Only on /r/incels
this
...
It hit mainstream a long time ago. Also
>/r/incel
Back reddit.
woman includes the word man and female has the word male in it.
You should call them queens
No, I'll not install this crap just to see what you're talking about.
How so?
>go back to plebbit
>NO U go back to plebbit
kek
Or I don't hang out on Sup Forums enough to see the term, or it's just not a common term where I live, or in my demographic (I'm 35).
So... the guy thinks that calling women "females" seems a bit immature, so you accuse him of being underage? How does that even work?
>without consent
>without consent
>without consent
Why do they keep saying the same shit over and over again? Do you also need consent to see other people at their eyes and walk on the same streets?
...
It's not a common term. It's something angry virgin postulate happens, but doesn't really in real life. They claim that women that have a lot of sex will eventually get loose and that beef curtains (which kinda looks like roast beef hence "roastie") is the result of a girl having (lots of) sex and not being a virgin.
...
she looks cute in both of those?
it's clearly not a freckles filter.
I am way more attracted to her without makeup.
That makeup pic just sucks the cuteness out of her, if that makes sense.
you goddamn freak!
my guess about the rage is, that its mostly like the makeup industry making less $$$$ on selling it to girls
What is the point of writing buzzwords on a bunch of stickers and then taking off your pants and pulling up in your tshirt?
Is feminism a cult where you can make retards to anything as long as you angle it according to the religion?
underware collection for programming-kin
Most young females without mascara just don't look that good. If there's any makeup that should be turned into a skin augment, it's mascara.
>no programming socks
disgusting Sup Forums meme only fizzbuzz enthusiasts are fond of
She's still surprisingly cute.
>twitter.com
HAHHAHAHHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHHAHHAHAHHA
*inhale*
BWAHAHAHHAHHAHAHA
I was not ready for this scrolling down on tweeter.
fpbp
>4
it really did an impact to insecure women lmfao
>hating the pinapple of programming, the alpha and omega method, the core problem of everything ever made
I like how ugly girls faking it with makeup look hideous with this, but legitimately cute girls like taylor swift look just as good if not better
>the pinapple of programming
You fucking dumbass
>removes makeup
>pretends every woman is either imperfect or perfect under makeup
Worthless. Really. You can't regain hidden information through AI without a vast amount of images in different makeup applications and combining it.
>sorry no archive
>buzzfeed
>not even source code or site itself
Great. So you're advertising. Well fuck you. Go to somewhere else.
It's way too overzealous with making the skin horrible. It's pretty much worst case scenario every time.
>he isn't at the pineapple of programming
>imperfect or perfect
What other option is there?
My bad. You get my point I hope. It almost certainly looks for extremes.
I don't think you are correct. After seeing several of these, it clearly works (maybe imperfectly) at counteracting each of the principal aspects of makeup.
>removes lipstick
>removes mascara and eyeliner
>removes blush
>removes foundation by increasing contrast of blemishes
natural tens are unaffected
.... so it's a term used primarily by ultravirgins that don't know how a vag actually works. And those sake ultravirgins are accusing people who don't know of the term of being children. Is it irony or are they trolling? I don't want to believe people could possibly be that fucking dumb. Maybe Lenin was right and we SHOULD send these insects to forced labour camps.
Can someone try this on mila kunis?
Someone's been telling me that she looks terrible without makup, but I'm dubious.
Well it also changed her eye tone. And who knows what skin tone she has exactly.
Also the source there is clearly shopped. Not a fair assessment of the software even.
I'm not incorrect though. Even if the results in this instance were accurate it's purely luck. Because it's a theoretically impossible problem. You can't regain missing information.
Well you're retarded user. It can't be fixed.
Idiots rather. Don't slander virgins please.
Just off the boat, eh?
>at counteracting each of the principal aspects of makeup.
it doesn't and can't do shit for contouring and other techniques that try to change the shape/shadows of the face and while you say it removes foundation it's still just guessing at the end of the day
you also say natural 10s are unaffected but you're not considering that natural 10s look completely different without makeup and this app just makes their makeup look natural rather than really giving you an idea of what they look like without makeup, there's a photo floating around somewhere of karlie kloss without any makeup on and spoiler it doesn't look anywhere near as good as suggests
also see pic related, the after pic is going to look nothing like the before pic when ran through such a program and it's a fairly modest transformation
and don't get me wrong it's a great novel idea but makeup can have a stupidly powerful transformation effect even when it's incredibly subtle and natural looking to the point where if you try looking up photos of models without makeup you'll only ever find pictures of them already wearing natural looking makeup
that's a lot of observer bias
Remember how many pathetic cosmopolitan whites refer to themselves as "white males". It's much worse because its practically verbal castration
I dated a girl back in the day who's cousin was a Tommy Hilfiger model (this used to be a bigger thing). In fact it was Ivanka Trump that took her place.
Anyway i hung out with this girl a few times with my GF and she didn't wear makeup. Literally none, she was a hippy type against it except for when she was doing a shoot. Anyway she was a 10/10 and needed no make up at all. Dutch genes.
Don't reply to my post without my consent.
>sounds like the kind of thing a Ferengi would say.
My sides. Thanks user bro!
Before pic is actually attractive. Final pic looks like some dumb cunt I would make fun of.