Budgeting computers opinions

When building a computer on a budget, would you rather a HDD+SSD, or put the SSD money towards a more powerful CPU, GPU or More RAM?

Just want to know what some of you fags prioritise. Is an SSD necessary?

retarded looking bimbo/10

wow that's a perfect score

i would never use ssd in budget build for myself.

If you need to save money, probably do low power consumption rather than more cpu or ram.

you can buy much better gpu....
or processor with more cores....
or get more ram cause 8 gigs for example is not much nowadays.

dont talk shit about my wife

I refuse to use anything without an SSD as main drive, even if it's a budget build or a laptop from 2007.

Everything is way too fucking sluggish on HDDs, plus even if you're in a budget chink noname SSDs are cheap and if you aren't retarded you'll have backups of your important things anyway.

Depends what you use your computer for , if you're a gaymen you want a good gpu and enough storage for all your gay porn. I use a small ssd for my os and some programs , can't live without an ssd now.

>building a computer on a budget
1.Buy second hand stuff , old but powerful cpu/gpu/ram , they also tend to last a long time.Motherboards with solid capacitors also are good , sh psu/hdd/ssd are a no no
2.Buy chink stuff , I have a chink ssd , better price and performance that what I can have locally and a 3 year warranty .
3.Stop buying brand shit like branded ram , MAXIMUM XXXTREME OC DUAL FANS gpus etc
4.This is one of my one but I only buy cheap psus , literally the cheapest stuff , had a few go bad but no damage to other components . As long as they have required protections you'll mostly be fine.

>MAXIMUM XXXTREME OC DUAL FANS gpus etc
leave dual fans.
reference 1 fan design is total SHIT.
they should ditch such cards out of production.

8GB RAM is a must. Preferably dual channel.
A bronze certificate PSU. No need for more than 500W, or 300W if you won't get a GPU.
Any non shit CPU with integrated graphics. Something with 4 physical cores. Doesn't have to be of the current gen. i5 gen 4 is more than good enough for the next 5 years and it works well with decent GPUs which you can buy later. Otherwise get a cheap ryzen and a cheap (GDDR) GPU.
0.5/1TB HDD. You probably won't have enough for an SSD so this will be the primary storage for at least a year.
If you haven't, get a GPU when you have enough money, or an SSD. I'd prioritize SSD instead of a GPU unless you want to play videogames (at least ones made after 2008 with a 40+ FPS)
Avoid chink PSUs and SSDs. Avoid non-GDDR GPUs. Avoid AMD CPUs that aren't ryzen and if you do get ryzen you pretty much need a GPU.

>Is an SSD necessary?

Yes, everything else is negotiable.

>4.This is one of my one but I only buy cheap psus , literally the cheapest stuff.
I do the same shit, they just werk and got a $11 one still working fine after 6 years.

There are budget HDDs with 128MB cache now iirc, better put the money to more ram or a stronger processor if you're on a budget.

If you want to play video games, an SSD won't improve your performance at all, your fps will benefit from a stronger processor.

>an SSD won't improve your performance at all, your fps will benefit from a stronger processor.

That is completely false. There are plenty of games that benefit greatly from a SSD.

>SSD won't improve your performance at all, your fps will benefit from a stronger processor

this is why i don't have ssd.
videocard/cpu is more important for gaming.
ssd really needed only for some mmorpgs to load characters faster in cities.

What games? Give me benchmarks comparing HDD vs SSD ingame performance. I doubt anything other than loading times gets better. Worst case scenario performance is better only if you don't have enough RAM so caching is done on your disk.

For productivity users, not gayme playing faggots

>Skyrim, GTAV, Witcher 3, etc.

You do realize that many games do loading on the fly as you play, thus increasing your FPS when using an SSD, right?

Just save an extra paycheck and get an ssd, the overall usability is so nice.

>When building a computer on a budget, would you rather a HDD+SSD, or put the SSD money towards a more powerful CPU, GPU or More RAM?
I would put the ssd money elsewhere in the system. I could always just install my os on a flash drive, or just run it in ram anyway, so my hard drives can be slow, or in raid if I care enough to.

Skyrim ? Witcher 3 ? you are joking, right? They work perfectly without ssd!

Only real place where ssd is needed is like i said previously are some mmorpgs. Its just better to see characters around loaded much earlier.

>shit game, shit game, witcher 3
>less than 1% games would have this issue
Either way, loading on fly doesn't happen often at all nor does it matter in single player. You wouldn't have significant FPS drops anyway, fps would drop by 5-10% max, would only last a few seconds and your disk usage would only increase once per 5-30 minutes. So this is pretty irrelevant.

I never said that it was NEEDED you retart. Just that they greatly benefit from it.

>loading on fly doesn't happen often at all
>He thinks that open world games with large maps don't have to load new parts of the map often
You have obviously never played video games if you think the difference is negligible.

It's negligible unless you literally speedrun the game and don't pause when entering a new area. The only scenario where I see this happening is driving like crazy in GTA or literally (illegally) teleporting in other games. But thankfully that still doesn't reduce your FPS, it only means models will load a second or two later. Which, again, means you're wrong by saying SSDs will improve your FPS.

>You have obviously never played video games if you think the difference is negligible.
How often does your games swap straight from hdd? I play arma, skyrim, witcher, etc., and I don't have any issues while playing on spinny magnets. Shit I've ran these games in ramdiscs without any noticeable improvements in game, so I don't see how putting them on an ssd would be an improvement.

>Just that they greatly benefit from it.
There is no benefit of ssd for most single player games and many multiplayer ones apart from loading times.
Most games just made to pre-load lots of stuff to ram so there is no highly noticeable performance drop.

Seriously ssd is absolutely last thing that i would consider in gaming pc. Last.

How do I find more pictures like this? Pretty sluts with huge tits. I'm sick of hardcore porn.

So how's your wife and my son doing?

there's this thing called instagram

Didn't read what you wrote
Just wanted to say nice pic

/s/

Do you even know what website you're on? We pretty much invented this shit