Open postbox for 4.99

>open postbox for 4.99
>funnyjunk.com (2 week) (common)
>pintrest.com (2 week) (common)
>tumblr.com (1 week) (rare)
>trading post
>facebook.com (1 week) (legendary) 150$
>youtube.com (mythic) (1 week) 200$

Other urls found in this thread:

fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/10053/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>none of the sites listed are of any value to anybody

wow, what a huge loss, not!

>using the 'not' joke unironicly
I shiggy

>the left one forces you to use equally same MBps with others even though you can get more with your money
>the right one lets you choose to use a slower one or buy more with a better MBps
>somehow the right one is bad

>thinks ISPs are going to be your friend and save you money
they'll most likely be structured like cable channel packages are now, 90% shitty sites/services subsidized by the 10% of shit you actually want.

Can't the mods just permaban all the anti neutrality idiots? These retards obviously don't belong on a tech board, they should be at Sup Forums circlejerking in celebration because their internet is gonna be slower for no good reason.

Explain how the left is a bad thing

>locking yourself out of the internet you can access basically in its entirely
>wanting to pay more for the same or less, at the expense of others
>wanting to line the pockets of corporations in return for them fucking you and/or other people over

>the left one forces you to use equally same MBps with others
Incorrect.
>the right one lets you choose to use a slower one or buy more with a better MBps
The choose is between a plan that lets you do whatever you wish at the speed that you paid for or have your isp control what you can use that bandwidth on so that they can extort money from you or the services you wish to use.

*choice

Let me break this down for you, dumb anime poster.
YOU pay ALICENET for Internet access.
MOM & POP MOVIES pays BOBNET for Internet access.
ALICENET and BOBNET agree to connect their networks and share a certain amount of traffic.
They do this because it creates value for customers of both ALICENET and BOBNET.
What Net Neutrality says is, ALICENET can't treat packets from MOM & POP MOVIES specially.
YOU and MOM & POP MOVIES both already paid your ISPs to be connected to the Internet.
If ALICENET can't handle the traffic from BOBNET, they can either git gud or disconnect BOBNET.
If ALICENET gits gud, YOU receive better service because ALICENET upgraded their capacity.
If ALICENET disconnects BOBNET, YOU also receive better service. Why is that, you ask?
Well, that's because CAROLNET can now step in and offer better service to YOU than ALICENET.

>implying they won't have kikebook on common tier

>reducing lanes results in less traffic congestion and less accidents
>retarded analogy that doesn't understand traffic flow
fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/10053/

is net neutrality only pushed be dems?

It's only opposed by cucks.

This image has not just to do with speeds, but with network congestion. On the left, everyone is treated equally, allowing to go as fast as they pay for. On the right, you're stuck in a heavy traffic lane, where your speeds will be very slow even though you paid for speed, you would also have to pay for the fast lane priority.

No,by people who will make shit load of money from this.

fixed your image to better reflect reality

>stackoverflow.com
>github.com
>1 year personal $40
>For use in business, 1 year commercial is $300
>You have to explain to your tech illiterate boss why you need them

>I need stack overflow and github so I can look at code and ask questions about code and better understand code

>>What the fuck am I paying you for if you don't already know how to code!?!?!?

>I NEED A CUTE PICTURE TO UNDERSTAND A PROWEM :33333

Go fuck yourself.

Equal lanes average speed would be slower than the combination of the two. The road isn't any wider.

No dumb idiot, your second image is how things are right now. You can pay more for more Mbps.

reddit btfo

>we are using github to effectively manage our code and it allows us continue developing cheaply and efficiently.
>without it we have to make a local replacement and pay the $500 1 year license for vpns

>Normies have to pay for social media
Why is this bad?

Please look at the picture and think about it for second before you ejaculate on your keyboard and press post, thanks.

Only in your country.
Here we get the max speed the area!can get. And we have no net neutrality

>tumblr.com (1 week) (rare)
Good, more of those freaks stay out the better(porn channels are ok)

>TFW idiots who don't know what Net Neutrality is are actively against it and want this to happen

It's like they WANT to be fucked in the ass by large corporations.

Nope. It'll be more like this: Facebook - free. YouTube - free. CNN - free. Fo everything else you'll have to pay.

>the isps should treat everyone fairly
>the websites can ban who ever they want

This is a step forward from this hell we live in

>Allowing the isps to ban everyone they want somehow makes things better

This idea that regulations are bad is such a meme put forth by Republicans with absolutely no evidence. Of course you don't want to over-regulate but some feedback helps ensure corporate powerhouses don't completely take advantage of
their workers, the customers, and the environment.

It's a bit like electronic feedback. When you completely throw out all regulation amplifiers will run open loop with extremely high gain and saturate at the voltage rails or will tend to oscillate, both of which are bad when you want a circuit to be linear. However too much regulation reduces gain by a lot so there is a sweet spot. I don't understand why this process is so hard for people to grasp?

it will kill social media.
as it stands social media is losing money every year yet people keep investing, if isps start charging facebook money, they will die, assuming no one jumps in to invest more money into the garbage.

>It's a bit like electronic feedback. When you completely throw out all regulation amplifiers will run open loop with extremely high gain and saturate at the voltage rails or will tend to oscillate, both of which are bad when you want a circuit to be linear. However too much regulation reduces gain by a lot so there is a sweet spot. I don't understand why this process is so hard for people to grasp?

I like to smart post at people who i know, don't have any idea what i'm walking about and see who just goes along with it in hopes that they don't appear stupid.

Dude, it's like electronics 101. I'm not even smart. You're on a tech board. How do you not know the basics?

>social media losing money every year
Retard alert. Facebook makes an assload of money every year