DRM in the Linux kernel

Pic related is Sean Paul. He's a staff software engineer for Chrome OS at Google and a Linux kernel maintainer. Sean is currently working on getting HDMI DRM patched into the Linux kernel.

lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/1/593
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-bandwidth_Digital_Content_Protection

How does this make you feel?

Other urls found in this thread:

github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/c6a57a50ad562a2e6fc6ac3218b710caea73a58b
fsfla.org/ikiwiki/selibre/linux-libre/
git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git/tree/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Fuck that shit. Should be illegal.

feels pretty gross and nonfree, man.

How did he reconcile the DMCA and GPL?

Man fuck Google everything.

CANCER OF THE INTERNET

What exactly does HDMI DRM do?

It's best known for having its implementation commented out in the Linux kernel sources

Makes it so you can control what devices "content" can be played on.

Of course he would try to implement DRM on Linux so that no one pirates hours songs.

# modprobe -f -r hdmi_drm

Oy vey! This man is an enemy of Linux and a threat to the Hobby. Hans! You know what to get!

The gas chamber?

Heh I'm still using VGA, nothing personnel kid

Flammenwarfer or MG 42 is required, I believe.

rekt

>even cables have botnet now

Advancement was a mistake. We should have stuck with 20MHz machines and 28.8k dial-up.

>HDMI

absolutely proprietary

>28.8k dial-up
We had to advance, otherwise how else would the Jewish propaganda perpetrate itself into the minds of young children?

I have literally never dealt with this. Is it actually cable DRM, i.e. plugging it into the wrong device gives you an error message telling you to fuck off?

>google wants drm in browsers for audio and video (w3c approved)
>google wants drm in hdmi cables for audio and video

Hmmmm...

What is the chance this will become a part of the colonel?

See The great thing about free software is that, if there's an unwanted feature in a piece of software, you can just remove it.

Some other drivers had it for years, what's your point?
github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/c6a57a50ad562a2e6fc6ac3218b710caea73a58b

OwO what's this?
fsfla.org/ikiwiki/selibre/linux-libre/

What is Linus thinking?!

Linus is a Red Hat employee, why would he be against this?

Why would he be against a piece of GPL code enabling a hardware feature? amd and nvidia bake this shit into linux firmware, and there is a shitton of blackbox firmware in linux-firmware
git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git/tree/

I was going to post about how displayport is superior to HDMI, then I read up on it and it has DRM too

DVI-D is the only true standard

why woulx anyone that is not a jew want this in the kernel?

...

bad. it makes me feel bad.
thanks OP

Why do you guys care? Nobody will force you to use it. Everybody who cares about their freedom, including me, can ignore it and move on with our lives. It's likely to ever be used in OEM and embedded systems.

>Nothing to worry about, goy!

the market will force you to use it

fpbp

kek

Most likely someone will fork this to have a version without cancerous DRM.

It's DRM
In the linux kernel

Someone will find a way to hang you with it

>linux users
>part of the market

No.... it allows you to play drm content as opposed to not being able to play drm. If it’s in the kernel, you can just read the code and decide if you want it or not

I would accept it being in userspace with the option to remove it by uninstalling a package, but not in the kernel.

How else am I going to stream muh HD Netflix on the Google branded Gentoo-book?

You're implying that it will be open source. They could very well release a binary blob-module. Not that it matters anyway, nobody is forcing you to use it and due to the nature of the open source GNU+Linux environment, it would quickly be reverse engineered or worked around anyway.

>the open source GNU+Linux environment
*free

when do we fork

software freedom is a superset of source freedom
don't be pedantic, user

Already happened. See: