Intel v AMD

It's been an interesting year for CPU's.

Other urls found in this thread:

notebookcheck.net/Our-first-Ryzen-5-2500U-benchmarks-are-in-and-Intel-has-every-reason-to-worry.266618.0.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

TR is selling way better than I thought.

TR is bananas. Server grade CPU at consumer prices.

Featureful mobos.

Only thing missing is flawless software. they need to dump all the money their getting into shoring up their software stack

Enthusiast CPUs are a tiny part of the market.

AMD needs to become a serious player in laptops to pose and challenge to Intel.

If i'm reading this right, AMD's high end CPUs are selling better/more quantity than their low end ones? That's really unexpected.

Not many people buy $80 CPUs when custom building, shock horror.

7700k is also best-selling intel cpu.

I would expect 1700/1700x to be on top then

Yeah but for AMD it's a perfect relationship between price and quantity. I just found it interesting because usually the mid or low end stuff sells in higher quantity..

>I would expect 1700/1700x to be on top then
Frankly the graphs read horribly.
Using the same colours for multiple entries? Not a problem if you clearly label areas. But they haven't.
So far as we know the 1700 could be the best seller of the R7 range.
But for the R5 1600 to be so popular is expected, it's really great value, $200 for 6c/12t @65w TDP? ticks a lot of boxes there m8

>implying Intel is a challenge after Ryzen

2500u is out and 2700u to follow. If AMD can come up with an Intel inside tier marketing plan they should be golden.

I mean shit Intel is actually buying a Vega design, its that good at that scale.

There's apparently a 2800U or 2900U whatever in the works with a fully enabled 11CU Vega, probably higher clocks too.

this. those damn APU's are strong af while using little power
>pic related
notebookcheck.net/Our-first-Ryzen-5-2500U-benchmarks-are-in-and-Intel-has-every-reason-to-worry.266618.0.html

>There's apparently a 2800U or 2900U whatever in the works with a fully enabled 11CU Vega, probably higher clocks too.
thought the 11 CU Vega APU was going in Desktop but why not into Mobile too. Now let's hope the next driver update will add the missing features of Vega...

>>pic related
whoops

>missing features of Vega
Things will become pretty silly really soon.

>Things will become pretty silly really soon.
please be true

Culling through PS is great, but TBDR and internal merger of shader stages using LDS (aka without going off-die) will make is absolutely silly.
Its merely a question of software.

Actually the whole idea of Vega is preventing going off-die as much as possible.
Makes a very solid base for future MCM implementation.

Though I want AMD to release a Vulkan extension for PS along with some relevant documentation.
PS is a very good solution to the very real problems.

I though people liked talking about Vega here?

R5 1600 and r5 1600X are top sellers, if I'm reading this right. It's stacked, not superposed (I think).

1600 is the sweet spot in price/performance.
It's positioned to sell a lot.