1. you're cunt
2. can you answer this question?
Sup Forums math
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
40?
40 sharts?
It's 96 senpai
96
96?
96
Woho lads don't copy me, okay?
Ninety-six
40.
30 the only correct anwer
No, my internet is just mediocre speed.
actually it's 19, the second and third ones are incorrect
19. Retards.
52
1+4*1=5
2+5*2=12
3+6*3=21
8+11*4=52
1+4 = 5
5 + 2 + 5 = 12
12 + 3 + 6 = 21
21 + 8 + 11 = 40
So the answer is 40
flag
96, take this simple shit back to Sup Forums
literally only correct answer itt
96
Fuck off Grant Morrison.
it's all fucking wrong after the first one, that's the fucking answer
96 obviously
t. 139 IQ
DING DING DING DING
next question
? is the answer
50%
40
1+4=5
5+2+5=12
12+3+6=21
21+8+11=40
19 duh, it's a fucking sum
wew that was fast.
point out where the missing area came from
1 + 4 = 1 x (4 +1) = 1 x 5 = 5
2 + 5 = 2 x (5 + 1) = 2 x 6 = 12
3 + 6 = 3 x (6 + 1) = 3 x 7 = 21
8 + 11 = 8 x (11 + 1) = 8 x 12 = 96
52
You moved orange 2 right to drop into green, making a hole
it came from you're mums pusy
Many small pieces of missing area around the hypotenuse.
No. No. NO.
Not ding ding ding.
96 is correct.
How can it be 52?
Because of 1-2-3-4?
That CANNOT be the fucking answer.
protip: these problems are literally made with several correct solutions to play a devious joke on those solving them
user calm down. There is no real answer because there aren't any common numbers between any of them.
the small and big triangles don't have the same angles, so to fit the other pieces to their sides it wouldn't make the same geometric shape or something like that?
You haven't firgured out that there are 3 or 4 ways of solving it, could be 40, 52, 96, etc.
All are right
FUCK OFF
point out the mistake
hint: its not obvious
division by 0
(OP) (OP)
IF
1+4=5
2+5=12
3+6=21
THEN
4+7=32
5+8=45
6+9=60
7+10=77
THEREFORE
8+11=96
96
if a=b, then (a-b)=0 and it all goes to shit from there right?
19
96
That was really easy and Im far from being genius
Comes with the pajeet status
left number x right number + left number, so 96
19
52
this guy has it
96 i guess, but everyone knows this
Wait... Now that i looked all the answers in this thread i see this is not some sort of normal problem, there are just too many patterns behind it... I would say that, to be sure, there should be more equations to solve the next one
there is really only one correct way and that gives 96
2/3
96
>2+5=12
2+5 doesn't equal 12.
3+6 doesn't equal 21.
I am not wasting my time on this tomfoolery.
96
It's really (a x b) + a
it's not linear I think
666
oi \m/
Agreed
1+4=5
2+5(+5)=12
3+6(+12)=21
8+11(+21)=40
19.
I laugh at these retards who say 96 due to other operations.
Butifel
SHART IN THE MART
1 * 4 = 4 + 1 = 5
2 * 5 = 10 + 2 = 12
3 * 6 = 18 + 3 = 21
8 * 11 = 88 + 8 = 96
The answer is 40.
DUDE GENIUS LMAO
2/3 right? Since you picked a gold ball the one box with 2 grey ones no longer counts. With that box disqualified there now only exists 2 gold balls and 1 grey one.
96
a*b+a
no, 1/2
If you get the gold one first, you either get the gray one from the second box or the golden one from the other
(same box)
WINRAR!!!1
19
96
Took me one minute anyways.
Solution in pic
40. What do I win?
Must be 96, which one is right answer?
You're wrong, there's a greater chance of picking the box with the two gold ones
en.wikipedia.org
>8+11*4=52
Why is there 4 and not 8?
?
interesting, misleading part is that you don't consider the probability of the first choice since it's presented as a given
40
exactly
You should ask why is there 8 and not 4. Because you can't continue that sequence, it's not a progression. So all answers in the thread are correct.
This one is pretty easy
...
lol nerd who the fuck cares
C 0,5 ?
I have no idea m8
and what exactly you need to find here?
>three fucking circles
40 is the answers, and >american education
19
Diameter I think
The radius of smallest circle fampai
I'd really like to see someone do this in whatever crazy-ass math class they happen to be enrolled in.
Lol, radius of course
Italy
40
No, I didn't look at the comments below.
1*4+1=4
2*5+2=12
3*6+3=21
8*11+8=96
But the answer could also be
4*11+8=52
Because quite frankly there are no proofs that the multiplier is related to the first number.
Oops typo 1*4+1=5
8+11=19
This problem is not missing any other answer, and did not request anything else.