Sup Forums math

1. you're cunt
2. can you answer this question?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand's_box_paradox
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

40?

40 sharts?

It's 96 senpai

96

96?

96

Woho lads don't copy me, okay?

Ninety-six

40.

30 the only correct anwer

No, my internet is just mediocre speed.

actually it's 19, the second and third ones are incorrect

19. Retards.

52

1+4*1=5
2+5*2=12
3+6*3=21
8+11*4=52

1+4 = 5
5 + 2 + 5 = 12
12 + 3 + 6 = 21
21 + 8 + 11 = 40
So the answer is 40

flag
96, take this simple shit back to Sup Forums

literally only correct answer itt

96

Fuck off Grant Morrison.

it's all fucking wrong after the first one, that's the fucking answer

96 obviously

t. 139 IQ

DING DING DING DING

next question

? is the answer

50%

40
1+4=5
5+2+5=12
12+3+6=21
21+8+11=40

19 duh, it's a fucking sum

wew that was fast.

point out where the missing area came from

1 + 4 = 1 x (4 +1) = 1 x 5 = 5

2 + 5 = 2 x (5 + 1) = 2 x 6 = 12

3 + 6 = 3 x (6 + 1) = 3 x 7 = 21

8 + 11 = 8 x (11 + 1) = 8 x 12 = 96

52

You moved orange 2 right to drop into green, making a hole

it came from you're mums pusy

Many small pieces of missing area around the hypotenuse.

No. No. NO.

Not ding ding ding.
96 is correct.

How can it be 52?
Because of 1-2-3-4?

That CANNOT be the fucking answer.

protip: these problems are literally made with several correct solutions to play a devious joke on those solving them

user calm down. There is no real answer because there aren't any common numbers between any of them.

the small and big triangles don't have the same angles, so to fit the other pieces to their sides it wouldn't make the same geometric shape or something like that?

You haven't firgured out that there are 3 or 4 ways of solving it, could be 40, 52, 96, etc.
All are right

FUCK OFF

point out the mistake

hint: its not obvious

division by 0

(OP) (OP)
IF
1+4=5
2+5=12
3+6=21

THEN
4+7=32
5+8=45
6+9=60
7+10=77

THEREFORE
8+11=96

96

if a=b, then (a-b)=0 and it all goes to shit from there right?

19

96
That was really easy and Im far from being genius

Comes with the pajeet status

left number x right number + left number, so 96

19

52

this guy has it

96 i guess, but everyone knows this

Wait... Now that i looked all the answers in this thread i see this is not some sort of normal problem, there are just too many patterns behind it... I would say that, to be sure, there should be more equations to solve the next one

there is really only one correct way and that gives 96

2/3

96

>2+5=12

2+5 doesn't equal 12.
3+6 doesn't equal 21.
I am not wasting my time on this tomfoolery.

96

It's really (a x b) + a

it's not linear I think

666
oi \m/

Agreed

1+4=5
2+5(+5)=12
3+6(+12)=21
8+11(+21)=40

19.

I laugh at these retards who say 96 due to other operations.

Butifel

SHART IN THE MART

1 * 4 = 4 + 1 = 5
2 * 5 = 10 + 2 = 12
3 * 6 = 18 + 3 = 21
8 * 11 = 88 + 8 = 96

The answer is 40.

DUDE GENIUS LMAO

2/3 right? Since you picked a gold ball the one box with 2 grey ones no longer counts. With that box disqualified there now only exists 2 gold balls and 1 grey one.

96
a*b+a

no, 1/2
If you get the gold one first, you either get the gray one from the second box or the golden one from the other

(same box)

WINRAR!!!1

19

96

Took me one minute anyways.

Solution in pic

40. What do I win?

Must be 96, which one is right answer?

You're wrong, there's a greater chance of picking the box with the two gold ones
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand's_box_paradox

>8+11*4=52

Why is there 4 and not 8?

?

interesting, misleading part is that you don't consider the probability of the first choice since it's presented as a given

40

exactly

You should ask why is there 8 and not 4. Because you can't continue that sequence, it's not a progression. So all answers in the thread are correct.

This one is pretty easy

...

lol nerd who the fuck cares

C 0,5 ?

I have no idea m8

and what exactly you need to find here?

>three fucking circles

40 is the answers, and >american education

19

Diameter I think

The radius of smallest circle fampai

I'd really like to see someone do this in whatever crazy-ass math class they happen to be enrolled in.

Lol, radius of course

Italy
40
No, I didn't look at the comments below.

1*4+1=4
2*5+2=12
3*6+3=21
8*11+8=96

But the answer could also be
4*11+8=52

Because quite frankly there are no proofs that the multiplier is related to the first number.

Oops typo 1*4+1=5

8+11=19

This problem is not missing any other answer, and did not request anything else.