Roman STRONK

Roman STRONK

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Anglo-Afghan_War
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

just imagine if we merged

Mongols 'reigned' for roughly 200 years, Romans for a 1000, and they left several empires to inherit their ideas, lagnuage, and constructions
Mongols didn't build anything, didn't govern anything, didn't develop anything. They basically just told people to pay a tribute or else

>B-but..
image related

And they (alongside their successors) annihilated the Middle East (and other places less) multiple times over. Imagine how much less of a shithole ME would be nowadays if it wasnt for fucking genghis. Literally worse than hitler

sounds good as conquerors not as rulers

Again, the word 'rule' implies active participation in the matters of state, which mongols just didn't do.

Mongol empire is a stain upon history

Mongols weren't even a proper empire.

...

>Teacup Empire tries to conquer Central Asia
>Get raped by Russia
>Try to make Afghanistan buffer zone
>Get back-stabbed and get more than ten thousand brits and commanders massacred

Khan made that happen within a decade, Mongol was much more effective in conquering lands.

>Mongols weren't even a proper empire.
SAID THE FUCKER WHO """""""""""""""""""""""""""CONQUERED""""""""""""""""""""""""""" NIGGERS WITH SPEARS BY FIGHTING THEM WITH MACHINE GUNS

asshole..

more than yours

In addition to the destruction of Baghdad/Mesopotamia,
They killed so many Persians and other Iranians and devastated their colonies in Central Asia and imported floods of Turks into the region, that ended up disappearance of eastern Iranian civilizations at the place like Khorezm and Fergana.
I believe it would have been still Indo-European in the areas on the south of Jaxartes, hadn't we Mongol shit.

>complains
It's none of your business, freak.

Are you still loyal to your Mongolian masters?

Mongol Empire was literally just a "MUH DICK IS BIGGER THAN URS LOL" thing.

Roman Empire was ACTUALLY a thing.

>some empty grasslands with 1 finn per 100 km2 vs the bustling shores of the mediterranean

>shartposter
>implying
I'm Mongolian myself, sharter. Sain bolnoo

Ruling over a nomadic horde requires a lot more effort and an advanced justice system. All Romans did was burn cities to grounds if they acted any rebellious , they did have basic laws but they didn't have a proper system that administered it.

>this is what mongol rape-babies actually believe

Whatever accomplishments Romans achieved is irrelevant because their civilization died with them and a bunch of mongrels now claim to be their heirs but Mongols are still around so Mongols > Romans.

btw do you niggers have a thought that doesn't start with "my dick?"

>"controlling" vast amounts of steppe, deserts, uninhabitable mountains, etc.
>they "rule" was pretty much just making a bunch of local chieftains/kings pay tribute
>didn't build even half as much as the romans
>disappeared fast

sure, they nominally controlled the largest empire, but like all nomadic "states", it was pretty shit.

Romans still exist, you know
Rome still exists :^)

>Romans for a 1000, and they left several empires to inherit their ideas
like what, the USA? European barbarians took a gigantic shit on the ruins of Rome and we have the Church to thank for preserveing some of the culture. Byzantium is entirely too different to count as continuity of the Western Rome.

Actualy the British Empire was the largest at its peak by landmass

>mongol empire
literally nothing

USA ain't an empire retard

I just wanted to feel what it's like being rude, to be honest ;) I don't care about Mongolians mostly. There are some Mongolian tribes in Kazakhstan(Naimans, Kereyts etc). Basically from "Orta juz".

nothing in the central asia

mongols unified cultures they have conquered, they have build cities for example sarai, they governed well, kublai khan is the first ruler in the world who has banned torture and they also valued scientist which mean they developed.

If you're okay with me raping your mom and use your sisters as sex slave but in return I build arenas and roads you should continue to support roman empire.

>didn't build anything, didn't govern anything, didn't develop anything
t.butthurt russian with no knowledge of history

mongols were one of the most efficient, if not the most efficient, military forces in the world

makes you think

come to librechan dot net/sichan my kazak brother

Accepted, thanks, buddy!

t. sharter

WE

SHART

yeah show em puny romans how to buttfuck chinks and muslims.
Japan still not conquered though.

Turkics defending mongols
Lol

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Anglo-Afghan_War

Do you realise how fucking retarded you sound?

>haha you are more technologically advanced, what a fucking loser!

Based England

What did the mongols build again, you turkic wannabe?

they should have handed their machine guns and have a fair game.
And then become like Greece.

>china

>en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Anglo-Afghan_War
>They also used an execution method involving urine; Pathan women urinated into prisoner's mouths.[17] Captured British soldiers were spread out and fastened with restraints to the ground, then a stick, or a piece of wood was used to keep their mouth open to prevent swallowing. Pathan women then squatted and urinated directly into the mouth of the man until he drowned in the urine, taking turns one at a time.

tfw no qt Afghan women to piss on your mouth

You know that's just British propaganda right? The British are experts at making up bullshit to demonize their enemies.

Afghans are savages tho

Nomads can be civilized too.

that's not really demonising, I pay good money for that treatment once a month

XD lmoa we had own writing while slavs fucked with bears in forests lmoa

Taiwan too?

Roman empire was a lot stronger than the mongolian empire, even tho the mongolian empire is bigger in areal. Mongolian clay is a lot of unprotected wasteland too, they just ran across it ontop of horses and claimed it.

Mongols sacked baghdad and destroyed the world's largest library at the time, such fags lol

What about Mughal Empire?

Well turkic and mongol culture was pretty much the same
Cant see why you are surprised at a turk defending mongols

horse niggers never created anything of value, and basically conquered an empty fuckhole. now they still live like they did 2000 years ago.

You are wrong on what they left.
Also, it's interesting thing if not for mongols there will be no Russians. They differ form european conquerors with a thing that they did it fast, and didn't change culture, language, religion, while our history with eorpeans like germans and swedes tells they they do it slowly, settlement by settlement, colonising, converting people living there, so weren't be even Russians anymore, so we had problems fighting these lands back.

Here you wrong, we can't say they were exactly military efficient. What they created an impire, like other, like Roman. Impire is capable of gathering much more military force and be free form organistion problems that feodal states had.
1) Feodals could gather only about 3-5% of their population, and number of professional warriors there is tiny, it's basicly duke's men. Mongols had other system, also nomad lifestyle gave interesting situation where you could easily refill your army, as every your man live on horse and shoots with bow from young age.
2) Duke can't forge a united army, some easily just didn't come to battle, or dicided to leave during it. And when their neighbor was defeated or killed they were rather happy, as they saw themselves as rivals.

Mongols used intelligence and ambassadors to know the situation and opponent's numbes, so they rightfully bring numbers 1 to 5-6, to insure victory.

They had surprises coming to these lands, there were castles they couldn't take, and problematic to siege, so they just pass it by.
They had problems with heavy cavlary, as when they met Russians we had typical knights, armored cavalry. Dukes as commanders always were in front, while mongol commanders at the bakc of their army. So rare victories of Russians in this time were about heavy cavalary managing to cut through all the archers to the enemy hq, and as mongols had much lower heavy cavalary forces and it's quality was also much lower, commanders were defeated and they lost.

It's really about the numbers, what power you can bring at once, as unite working army. Romans alse when met celts discovered cities and fortreses they never see, celts swords were better and became valuable. Romans also discovered "mail armor" when they met celts.

Mongols are rather about significant empire things like provisioning of great numbers, postal system, etc
Experienced and valued mongol commander could be called back from Russian lands to some land in China, and it was common thing. Great organsation was needed to make this possible, and make the paths safe.

Wow they conquered
fucking nothing

Romans were black and the size of Africa is misrepresented in most map projections so Roman empire was bigger.