AMD IS DEAD. LONG LIVE AMD

AMD IS DEAD. LONG LIVE AMD.

Other urls found in this thread:

amazon.com/ViewSonic-XG2401-FreeSync-Monitor-DisplayPort/dp/B01A0ZRR50
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Also dead, LOL

I swear Intel must be paying someone to submit scores, it doesn't make sense that AMD market would shrink two times in just half a year. Shit like that never happens.

Further proof Nvidia and Intel are for gaymen manchildren

Long live AMD means they're doing well and you're supporting them

Gaymer thread. Sage and hide.

millions of pubg chinks with hardware (from 2005) to add the survey, actual proof the survey means nothing

It's because of Chinese players who join Steam by the millions to play PUBG.

This is due to the rise of Steam and PUBG in China. Chinese use Intel far more than AMD, mostly because AMD doesn't really have distributors in that area of Asia.
AMD/Intel sales have been 50/50 in the West since Ryzen launched. This can be backed up by sales numbers from retailers from both NA and EU.
AMD GPUs still suck and have poor availability, though. Only the RX570/580 are worth it, but those all get scalped by miners anyway, so they don't make it to steam.

>nvIDIOTS

Why are you here?

English is DEAD, LOL! WHITE PEOPLE FANS BTFO!

Steam survey does not means shit. I have radeon and I don't use steam.

this is a good thing though
one less shitty competitor in the industry.
hopefully someone will buy them out (or just rtg) and make amd great again.

That survey has two big issues.
It's based on total market so let's say my nephew who only plays minecraft which I gave him a 550 for birthday after finding it used on ebay for 20 bucks helped add to the nvidia.
Second issue is that even if it was just on 2017 model sales, this is just for steam users.

Most AMD sales were for buttcoin faggots so both AMD and Nvidia right now are making mad dosh it's just that AMD is making it with retarded miners and Nvidia is making it with retarded gayman and research facilities / academics.

>tfw the 16gb shilling threads worked

You know they do, every time

i have geforce and i dont use steam.

look, its balanced.


you fucking subhuman pile of shit.

>english
>white

It's spoken by more white people than Chinese you dirty pedant

Or maybe, just maybe a mistake was made and they went back to fix said mistake?

you forgot geekbench results.

That's China's PUBG effect, pal
fresh pic

irony being AMD gpus end up in shitcoin rigs

when used for graphics they are current better than nvidia in all aspects at the mid range.

The first time I was prompted to take part in the steam survey was yesterday... 8 years after my account creation.

Their (((mistake))) was making amd look good, those result got gimped even harder if you look at the chart now

Really makes me think, wonder why valve has partnerships with Nvidia and Intel but not AMD, REALLLLLLLYYYYYYYY activates my almonds

>RX 2** rebrand too 3**
>RX 4** rebrand too 5**
>the vega joke

People are suprised?

>when used for graphics they are current better than nvidia

>being wrong

>when used for graphics they are current better than nvidia in all aspects at the mid range.
>Consumes less energy
>Higher FPS
>Cheaper because buttcoin fags only want ayymd
>g-sync
>physx

>g-sync
>physx
>good
lmao

Good thing you don't understand a thing about this topic, otherwise i would assume you have some kind of disability.

free sync is shit. sorry.

Can you elaborate please?

>paying 300 extra dollars just for having the gsync sticker
il pass on that
also you're daft, freesync is fantastic

not him but

I don't even know if that pie chart is supposed to be a joke or not.

>tom's
Weren't these fucks that said you should buy a 7500 over a 1600?

This, AMD release the same cards but overclocked while we have a big performance jump with new Nvidia GPU. The 290 and 390 are the same gpu, the rx470 and rx570 are the same gpu

>Ayymd

nvidia has been rebranding since they were founded and continue to this day
510 -> 605 (Fermi GF119)
GT520 -> GT610, GT620 (OEM), 705 (Fermi GF119)
GT530 -> GT620 (retail) (Fermi GF119)
GT440 (DDR3) -> GT630 (DDR3), GT730 (DDR3, 128-bit) (Fermi GF108)
GT440 (GDDR5) -> GT630 (GDDR5) (Fermi GF108)
GT545 (DDR3) -> GT640 (OEM) (Fermi GF116)
GTX560 SE (OEM) -> GT645 (Fermi GF114-400-A1)
GT630 (Kepler) -> GT740 (Kepler GK107)
GT630 (Kepler rev 2) -> GT710, GT720, GT730 (128-bit & GDDR5) (Kepler GK208)
210 -> 405 (OEM) (Tesla GT218)
GTX680 -> GTX770 (Kepler GK104)

not to mention all the bullshit with the Ti cards and titan x-xp-xpp

>confirming that you are an envidiot

They fell and then went back up. If you used the most recent charts you would know that. Get your head out of AMD's arse.

That's not how you say nvidiot, you dumb nvidiot.

>tomsjeware
please use non-shill sources

The fact is AMD rebrand almost all the 2** and all the 4**, this is worst.

Any proof than Freesync is better than G-sync?...

nvidia has done it more and still actively tries to cover it up
amd was honest about their re-brands and haven't even come close to half the number of re-brands nvidia has under its belt
>begone nvidiot shill

Freesync doesn't 60 FPS.

Any proof that they are different at all? That Tom's Hardware Pie chart has a ridiculously low sample size. Not as robust as, for example, the testing for the sound quality of opus.

>rebrand all a lineup twice is worst than few pointless card

for less than 30fps, sure
for more than 60fps, that's bullshit
A fuckton of freesync monitors can reach the maximum refresh rates of their monitors.

Freesync is limited to what the monitor supports, which is up to the manufacturer. Nvidia dictates the refresh rates to the manufacturer if they want a gsync monitor.

are you retarded? it 100% goes above 60fps
amazon.com/ViewSonic-XG2401-FreeSync-Monitor-DisplayPort/dp/B01A0ZRR50

>playing below 30fps with a 250$+ monitor
honestly if your dumb enough to blow your budget on a monitor instead of a sufficient computer you deserve to suffer

I need a source, Freesync monitors are inferiours, it's a fact.

its 100% shilling
i have owned both and you cant notice the difference
>just your wallet being a bit heavier

There is none. Nothing out there that would dictate any actual difference between gsync and freesync. In fact, from the way they work, there shouldn't even be a difference at all.

Speaking of monitor, should I buy a 144hz monitor or a 60hz? I've been told 144 is more future proof so I should just get that one, any objections?

if you have a good pc and only play AAA titles yeah
but if you play indie games and or unoptimized shit like me, you wont use it enough to justify the purchase

Free sync is software based, g-sync is hardware based, that alone already implies we have some latency in the middle.
Also free sync was based on VESA standard adaptive sync.

The biggest difference between free sync and g-sync is that the latter forces the GPU to adapt to the monitor refresh rate and it's way faster than forcing the monitor through software to adapt to the gpu refresh.
The issue here though is that the amd version can be tweaked and so on by the manufacturers while the nvidia one the manufacturers have to just follow a certain standard and nvidia does all the shit themselves behind closed doors which for people who wanted it to be open and all is a big middle finger but nvidia has always been like that.

tl;dr
Nvidia version = manufacturers follow standard and nvidia optimizes and tweaks so all monitors with it will be the same technology wise.
amd version = manufacturers do their own implementation of it so there will be a difference depending on which monitor you buy, that means some suck and some are awesome.

What do you even need it for, anyways? Personally, I'd go for 144hz just so I could watch muh animus without having to deal with judder or frame blending/interpolation. 24fps can fit in 144hz without problems.

you forgot to mention
>250-400 dollar nvidia tax
>25-75 dollar freesync tax

>that alone already implies we have some latency in the middle.
pure speculation

i'll be using my rig mainly for games and watching vids. However. I might opt for a lesser refresh rate, like something in the 120's now.

He could post any source, amdfags will say FAKE NEWS FAKE NEWS

>a site with hardcore evidence about it being paid off by intel
>nvidiots accepting any source so long as it proves their point, no matter the quality or truthfulness
you only prove our point that you're all idiots

Yeah and I use more than 10GB all the time. I will definitely upgrade to 32GB or 64GB when Zen2 TR gets released. That is, if the prices are not fucking retarded then.

>so much of a newfag that he doesn't remember the 780
leave underage

??????

Toms hardware a subsidiary of a company with a "consumer outreach program" with intel

Stop wast your time with these amdfaggot, they will never understand, they are shills who work for r/amd.

Now Intel love NVIDIA?

Nvidia mandates a certain range, AMD doesn't. If you pick one from each with a 35-144 range, like my Freesync one, they'll work identically. There are some awful ones floating around like 48-72hz.

And yet we are the ones that need to prove otherwise

You must be that same ass hole from yesterday with the 1060 5gb bullshit thread

Nvidia is not better than AMD

>twice the memory is equal to 1 packet of ketchup

if you had made 1 a single krabby patty and the other double krabby patty, you would see the difference and realize why you're dumb

may as well be posting those graphs that show HUGE change for 1fps

i wlll never ever EVER buy anything from AMD ever again they have lost me as their customer when they where caught gimping emulation performance

>bought a 7770
>start having heat issue 366 days old
>call amd
>they tell me I was SOL
>patch me over to their sales team

>buy GTX480
>cooling problems 18 months later (out of warranty)
>nvidia ships me a new fan and follows up a month later to see it if resolved my issue
>sold card, with new fan, to buy said 7770

I dun goof'd desu

no shit