Intel CEO sold $24 Million in stock after firm knew about cyber vulnerabilities

Intel CEO sold $24 Million in stock after firm knew about cyber vulnerabilities

thehill.com/policy/technology/367432-intel-ceo-sold-24-million-in-stock-while-firm-knew-about-cyber

>Intel CEO Brian Krzanich sold more than $20 million worth of company stock after his company had been informed of a massive cybersecurity flaw in its chips and prior to the company publicly disclosing the flaw.
>Krzanich sold stock and exercised options worth a rough total of $24 million on Nov. 29, reducing his holdings of Intel shares to 245,743 — the minimum required by his contract with the firm. The Intel CEO’s sale occurred as developers were racing to fix enormous vulnerabilities in their computer processors.
>Though the sale raises insider trading concerns, the Securities and Exchange Commission has not publicly said if it will investigate Krzanich.
>Intel says that his selloff came independently of the vulnerabilities and notes that it was preplanned.
>"Brian's sale is unrelated," an Intel spokesperson told Gizmodo.

Other urls found in this thread:

nystocknews.com/2017/10/09/lisa-su-sells-325000-shares-reducing-stake-in-advanced-micro-devices-inc-amd/
grammar-monster.com/easily_confused/its_its.htm
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

...

AMD CEO sold all its stock before rx vega release. Your point?

SUCK MY ASS

rly?

nystocknews.com/2017/10/09/lisa-su-sells-325000-shares-reducing-stake-in-advanced-micro-devices-inc-amd/

Vega wasn't a loss for them, was it?

They're selling out every single one they make.

>thehill
>the verge
>business insider
>daily mail
>salon
>vice

When will you faggots realize that any news other than on mainstream news channels like the BBC or CNN is not official?

Nothing will come of this.

Did rx vega also have major critical vulnerabilities which were about to be announced and the ceo knew about? no?
Your point?

No, they are selling every they can possibly fab.

as if anything came out of the ''''russians'''' screeching

>theshill
J U S T
U
S
T

>its
Is this how English works?
Or is user illiterate?

user refers to Lisa Su as neither a male or female, hence the use of "its". It's grammatically correct.

Lisa Su is neither male nor female?

"Its" shows possession, so it's fine.

that nigga gon git raped

I think your illitrette fgt lamo

I was just asking politely, homo.

>as neither a male or female
isn't that offensive thou or it is pc?

grammar-monster.com/easily_confused/its_its.htm

"It" is normally used for inanimate things. If you really want to avoid showing gender, the most standard non-retarded way is to use "their", not "its".

>tfw Sup Forums is more relevant for finance than /biz/

Ty

DE
LET

spotted the shitskin latino

how is it "preplanned" when the plans were made after the CEO knew about it?

Probably sold them to buy the dip

>any news other than on mainstream news channels like the BBC or CNN is not official?
I had no idea people like this still existed.

Intel new about at least 2 of the 3 vulnerabilities since JUNE. So how is him selling stock in NOVEMBER relevant, faggot?

Wrong.

The question was not about grammar the use itself because of ''CEO''.

>Sup Forums is ok with insider trading

Good meme

This is yellow journalism tier reporting intended to do nothing but generate clicks and start a riot.

He got paid in stock options and sold as soon as his shares vested. This isn't anything out of the ordinary. The only difference here is that he's never had so many shares vest at one time.

>>Sup Forums knows anything about the legal system
Good meme

>the Intel CEO's sale occurred as developers were racing to fix enormous vulnerabilities in their computer processors
Fake news.
They can't fix the processors at all. Just the design for the future.

Oh, of course. Just in time for a potentially company destroying vulnerability in Intel's CPU architecture. Just a coincidence, goy.

its not insider trading if he told his wife and he sold it all that would be insider trading

Trading by an insider before bad news comes out is not necessarily "insider trading." Most CEOs (including Krzanich, if you check Intel's filings) sell shares of stock from SBC plans late in the fourth quarter according to a fairly automated schedule. Even if he did know about this, there's no chance in hell the SEC would investigate it because an insider trading case requires a lot more than convenience of circumstance.

This user
is correct

>Intel new about at least 2 of the 3 vulnerabilities since JUNE.

Sauce?