RHEL 7.5 beta released!
>GNOME 3.26
>gimp 2.8.22
>libreoffice 5.3
>wayland along with fractional scaling as technology previews
access.redhat.com
THANK YOU BASED RED HAT
RHEL 7.5 beta released!
>GNOME 3.26
>gimp 2.8.22
>libreoffice 5.3
>wayland along with fractional scaling as technology previews
access.redhat.com
THANK YOU BASED RED HAT
Not a single reply? RHEL/CentOS is great.
Sup Forums generally hates RedHat.
Is it just a stable fedora? Advantages over debian stable?
There's a bit more to it then just "stable fedora" but yeah(they pick a version of Fedora and fix all the issues and add new packages and such).
As for using it over Debian, eh, different strokes different folks.
>Is it just a stable fedora?
Roughly, yes.
>Advantages over debian stable?
It's a distro put together with the backing of a multibillion dollar corporation as their flagship product. I think the better question is what advantages would debian stable have over it.
Never saw anyone use it for personal use t b h
About fucking time? Rhel is ancient
why hasn't rhel 8 come out?
2019
I'll download it tomorrow, see what's new. Thanks
>wayland
>systemd
>pulseaudio
>gnome3
>paywall patches
Geez thanks redhat, you're a real innovator.
Psh, I've been using 7.3 for nearly 16 years now and see no reason to change. 8 ruined Rh
being free?
I tried a trial version of their Workstation product and it's stable as fuck. If I wasn't a Windows fool I'd totally pay the 49 bucks.
kexec
interesting
its 49 dolla yearly, there is centos but the updates are lagged as hell
its amazing if you don't mind using gnome
There's CentOS.
The big updates take a few weeks to be officially released, like 7.3 -> 7.4, but after that any security or package updates are put out very quickly. If you want, the big updates are also available quickly through a special repository (CR - continuous release repository) before they're moved to the main one.
why haven't red hat create a botnet yet?
Debian has roughly 10x more packages in the main repo and offers actual kernel upgrades via backports rather than monstrous frankenkernels of dubious reliability. I've had CentOS kernel upgrades render systems unbootable semi frequently.
>THANK YOU BASED RED HAT
It's "Thank you, based Red Hat.".
comma.guide
One day I'll go on a rampage.
>frankenkernels of dubious reliability
The kernel engineers at Red Hat are competent.
>CentOS kernel upgrades render systems unbootable semi frequently
Rumor and hearsay. How many people actually need the very latest kernel when drivers are backported? Most hardware is going to be supported. The CentOS-Plus repository offers newer kernels, but then you're moving away from Red Hat upstream.
>Debian has roughly 10x more packages in the main repo
That's a legitimate point. You can use spec files from fedora for a lot of additional packages if you don't mind building your own rpms.
Try saying both of them out loud
Your version is very slightly autistic
You can sign up as a developer and get RHEL for free.
>still using yum
dnf > yum