>net neutrality gone
>it's no big deal
>no one cares anymore
>life goes on
Looks like Sup Forums was wrong again.
>net neutrality gone
>it's no big deal
>no one cares anymore
>life goes on
Looks like Sup Forums was wrong again.
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
techdirt.com
techdirt.com
arstechnica.com
twitter.com
...
Maybe Sup Forums just needs some time to be proven right.
The sun rose this morning.
Thank you based Trump.
I know now post more milky
weev is always right:
youtube.com
Not a big deal?
There's content already disappearing.
>legislation as significant as net neutrality
>effect of its repeal being felt mere weeks afterward
That's not how any of this works.
I'm proud to be a New Yorker.
net neutrality isn't repealed yet fuckwit
the law still stands
[citation needed]
>no one cares anymore
You mean other than 22 State AGs that are suing FCC?
only the redditors cared about muh net neutrality
It was never a problem here in Europe, you amerilard.
No one cares about Europe, shut the fuck up and get back to your cuck shed.
>on comcast
>most of 2017 torrenting anything i like
>5-6MBps easily
>suddenly former verizon lawyer turned Trump puppet P. Ajit gets appointed to FCC and kills NN
>2018
>all torrents drop to 500kbps
>if i have 1 torrent it's 500kbps
>if i have 10 torrents it's still 500kbps
>if i have 2 torrents across 2 computers it's 250kbps each
>if i find a torrent with a good connection i can literally sit there and watch it spike to 6MBps before being throttled down to 500kbps and then spike, throttle, etc continuously
Brain dead anti-NN republitard corporate dick sucking sheep need to be dragged into the street and shot in the face.
not even him but even I know tumblr posts even mentioning nn get taken down since its owned by verizon. putting aside
>tumblr
it more than adequately demonstrates whatll happen when shit really hits the fan
not sure if directly influenced, but shortly after the fcc shit canada isps are looking into removing sites to 'combat pirating' iirc
force encryption and put it on port 80 then report back
>tumblr
aaaa ye got me
>Tumblr
>owned by Verizon
>censors the insane fucks that actually uses Tumblr
Truly the best timeline
anything reddit is for, you should be against
it's common sense
REEEEEEE!!!! I SHOULD BE ABLE TO STEAL AT FULL SPEED PEOPLE WTF HOW AM I NOT SUPPOSED TO BREAK THE LAW FASTER THAN 8% SPEED REEEEEEEEE
rather verizon is just cutting out the spikes poking it directly. the insanos are just caught in the crossfire.
Pretty sure Sup Forums didn't give a shit. Only normies like you care
Of course it wouldn't happen immediately if NN does finally get struck down. They'd wait a while (months, probably) to get the furor to die down and let the issue get out of the news. Then they'd gradually start locking things down little by little and let people get used to it, and then eventually they'd get to their desired limits, and the internet would no longer be freely usable.
who is this jizz lizard
>Looks like Sup Forums was wrong again.
Sup Forums was right. The reddit invaders were wrong. Sorry that probably wasn't reddit even if it was cancerous. It was paid CTR/google shills.
...
sauce one the woman my good sir?
to be fair, that whole EA thing (which I know, muh vidya, but come on that shit was overblown to hell) was happening around the same time and I guess more people focused on that because that one reddit reply meme and the issue was easier for normies to understand.
that and the recent happenings of individual states working to establish their own state-centric NN (there was one that already has one up or in the works I think) helps in making people think "oh the worst is over, we're recovering!" along with "states are already working on it, my part is over!"
You have to be retarded to think that anything is going to happen on day one. They'll introduce changes gradually to ease you into the new fast lanes regime.
Wait which EA thing?
lootboxes, starwars battlefront, accused on promoting underage gambling
i think you're just too poor for good internet. net neutrality hasnt actually been repealed yet
>i think you're just too poor for good internet.
Not that user, but that's kind of the point of repealing NN: only those who have a lot of money would be able to afford usable internet speeds/access. And that state of things would be shit.
this.
like it or not, internet as a commodity isn't a thing anymore, it's becoming as important as electricity. It's this generation's automobile.
>N.N. heavily advertised
I guess 2nd amendment is also heavily advertised by that nonsense of a logic.
>nonsense of a logic.
That's probably a post from Sup Forums, so you're not likely to find logic in it.
Exactly, how can they be confused with actual, organic panic from netizens.
t. battleforthenet.com
The repeal isn't quite finalized yet plus various states are still fighting to pass their own version of net neutrality.
So, it's still a bit early for ISPs to start making post net neutrality investments.
>legacy captcha gone
>it's no big deal
>no one cares anymore
>lifes goes on
Now that you bring it up. Nothing has changed for me since it has been repealed looks like you and the other shills were full of shit.
It hasn't been repealed yet you inbreds, of course you don't notice anything yet. Retards like
leave this website if you're younger than 18, or go back to v, pol or whatever.
murica is literally europe's child
you dimwits still need to learn every lesson we already learned long ago
if god had any mercy he would grant me death from how hard I'm rolling my eyes.
shut the fuck up.
>everyone still ignoring AT&T monopoly anti-trust case
You deserve what you get when meme neutrality gets all the attention but the actual ISP monopoly thats about to form is ignored.
wrong subreddit, bubala
Fallacies like this were laughed out thousands of years ago. Get a new trick.
>aw shit this thing sucks, we gotta do something about it
>uh, no, this thing is worse
not saying you're wrong, but the world is so fucked that we're going to get blasted regardless if we focus on one thing at a time or split attention to multiple issues.
besides, there's always an x worse than y
>Mah sky is falling.
Well now I know who needs to go back to the normie spaces.
aiii, man, you blew it with that line.
(you)
AT&T time warner merger would give them a complete monopoly, killing all competition and consumer rights with or without net neutrality laws.
The reason you haven't seen many effects yet is because there are several lawsuits going on right now to reverse the repeal.
Not that user, but this would be just as bad as not having net neutrality in place. Looks like the people fighting these cases out in court need to git gud-er.
well my implicit point is that there are enough issues [regarding this] that there are bound to be some to fly under the radar, especially when NN was publicized as much as it is in comparison to at&t
I guess the bigger problem is the gross overestimation of how much research the average person is willing to invest into these things, especially with perceived relevancy. Like every normie I've heard talk about NN was all about videogames and porn instead of the greater implications.
How do you know it is your ISP that is throttling your torrent speed?
#teamgrimmie
Riddle me this Drumphers; why shouldn't I trust the government over corporations in this case? Doesn't papa cheeto run the government now? So why not trust him to run things, instead of corporations who don't fall under US jurisdiction?
...
NN wasn't a good thing. Since then all that happened was more censorship. Why do you think Gab opened up? Not to mention there were subsidies are part of NN, and that's not a good thing either.
>Acting like a nigger
Go back to Africa.
I agree with weev that "muh free and open internet" is a moot point. Addressing tech + telecom monopolies/abuses of free speech are the the more pressing issues, but I still think allowing paid prioritization when most americans don't have a choice between carriers is going to seriously harm consumers.
Also this thread probably doesn't belong on Sup Forums.
sry user, I forgot to give you your (You)
post her penis
*drinks your REEs*
You can have censorship independent of NN so your argument against NN is wrong.
>never had net neutrality before.
>we need it now]
If anything net neutrality people are trying to complete a self-fulfilling prophecy by inserting such terrible ideas to the companies
>corps finally get their way from a gov't mole
>states used to dealing with corporate assholery are ready and waiting
>arstechnica.com
Watch and learn midwest
>drink made of gooey warm chocolate-peanut butter mixture
ohhhh myyyy goooooooooood
Do you think he got that mug as a reference to "REEEEEEE"? Fucking based poojeet.
That has nothing to do with net neutrality though. It's a private site, they can censor whatever the hell they want. Always have been able to and always will be able to.
op think you could take your image down?
she's a friend of mine.
just because you're a goldsmith doesn't mean it's a good idea to harbor golddiggers
based
milk truk just arive
>he thinks he has the right to steal content
>republitard
...
Big boob gurl hi
aw man, this one just makes me hyper-aware of how short and stocky she is now.
its been a necessity for me to use VPNs to prevent throttling torrents since at least 2016, my current provider (2017) even has a clause stating any use of torrent software is an instant cancellation.
which provider?
Give name.
>Europe
You mean old America?
new rules don't apply for like 3 months or something you massive cunt
god anti-NN people are so useless and stupid
look at the history of the niggardry in ISPs. And you'll understand why we need it now more than ever with all these streaming services. Cable TV is nearly dead. They run that business too, and they want to shake every last penny out of people and blame it on everyone for "overusing" their shitty networks because customers are simply using what they pay for. The ISPs are just losing the bet and the parent companies don't want to decay their monopoly to do the logical thing and expand their network.
Yes but connections to trackers can be easily blocked.
...
Based gib poster
>>net neutrality gone
Did it even pass the senate?
Did what pass the senate? Obama's Net Neutrality? No, it was an FCC regulation, not legislation.
>used to not have Internet before
>used to not have electricity
>used to not have antibiotics
>used to not have agriculture
WTF your argument made me realize that we don't need any of those things!
>NN is supposedly anti big business
>yet big business overwhelmingly supports it
Sup Forums needs to realize how much demagoguery has plagued this issue.
kek Pai was an Obama holdover