Let's talk browsers /lads/

Let's talk browsers /lads/
>God tier (fast, modern and doesn't spy on you): Waterfox, Chromium
>Botnet tier (fast, modern but happily collects your info): Chrome, Firefox, Yandex
>Grandpa tier (lacks in features, probably botnet as well): Microsoft Edge, Safari, IE
>Underperforming tier (outdated and/or lacks in features): Opera, Brave, Vivaldi, etc.
Which one do you use and why?

Other urls found in this thread:

ghacks.net/2018/01/30/vivaldi-browser-privacy/
github.com/gcarq/inox-patchset
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Midori with NoScript. Midori is too simple to collect information and smells nice.

qutebrowser
i like the keybinds and the customizability
only complaint i have is the native adblocker could be better

>firefox
>botnet-tier
Is there any proof for this other than "muh george soros funding" which doesn't even relate to the browser itself

Brave because fuck SJWs

Where does Basilisk fall in?

>doesn't spy on you
Websites do that by themselves.

no there is no proof. it's Sup Forumstards spouting nonsense like always. ALL telemetry in FF can be completely disabled.
>mining shitcoins for ad providers
not even once.

>God tier (fast, modern and doesn't spy on you)
>Chromium
isn't chromium connected to exactly the same botnet chrome is? hence why someone made ungoogled-chromium

>Opera/Vivaldi lack features
>other chrome derivatives don't
>Opera not in "lacks features, definitely botnet as well" tier
???

I am happy you added chromium finally as reasonable option...


But I think browsers are kinda problem, I like webkit apps such as discord has.

Firefox, because tree style tabs

Let's all laugh at people who have more than 3 tabs open at any one time.

*breathes in*

haha.

It doesn't.

Pale Moon because Firefox doesn't support changing new tab to local file

What's the lightest Firefox-based browser? Something for a low spec netbook.

Opera runs great, but I need firefox for some niche things. Nightly is a little too unstable.

I find Pale moon to use the least amount of ram. It isn't as fast as Firefox perhaps, but it's not too shabby.

Surprisingly it was Seamonkey on my PC, tried Waterfox, pcxfirefox, firefox, firefox nightly and pale moon

Same as PaleMoon

Ungoogled-chromium is the only browser worth using

IceCat / PaleMoon SeaMonkey, Waterfox is nice but heavier than those 3

ghacks.net/2018/01/30/vivaldi-browser-privacy/

BOTNET

Chromium is botnet still, just slightly less so. Inox patchset makes it completely botnet free, so build it with that.

And you can easily achieve the same level of Waterfox-esque privacy on regular Firefox, just mess around in your about:config for 5 minutes.

Brave is only good on phones.

Host it on local server nigger.

It's host based so yeah it's kinda crap

How can I fix this fucking thing.

It's fucking annoying as fuck on some sites.

What do? I'm using chrome.

...

What is the best browser for KDE?

Stop using reddit spacings.

Chromium desu. Just be sure to Inox it if you want more privacy. If you're on Arch there's a build on the AUR.

But what about googled chrominum? Does it mine bitcoins?
(I don't care about pers.data)

github.com/gcarq/inox-patchset

You can see what Inox patches out of Chromium to essentially get a list of what they consider to be invasive towards one's privacy. tl;dr it pings a lot to Google still and has Google integration.

>line breaks started on reddit

>Chromium
>doesn't spy on you
Well this thread is off to a great start

Use ublock origin and enable the anti-adblocker stuff

pocket, telemetry, that one mr robot extension being auto-installed

>>Underperforming tier (outdated and/or lacks in features): Opera, Brave, Vivaldi, etc.
Have you actually used Opera or Vivaldi? They both have more features than Chrome and since they're Chromium are just as fast. Vivaldi in particular is a features beast. I switched when I realized I could do everything I liked in Firefox but with Chrome speeds about a year ago and it's only gotten faster (and less buggy) since

>>Underperforming tier (outdated and/or lacks in features): Opera, Brave, Vivaldi, etc.

Wh-whats wrong with Opera?

Kek

What is the best browser for battery life? My Firefox is eating up 60% of my battery even though I barely use it

Yeah, you tech illiterate retard. It isn't botnet.

It's shit

IceCat 60ESR will be the shit

FF quantum features
-full new addon support
-no drm, no telemetry, no pocket, none of the negative "features" of firefox
-GNU as in freedom

>
>Brave is only good on phones.
That's funny, I thought maybe on desktop it's good but never tried. It's shit on phones.

I hope they add ability to hide tabs on top for esr 60 or Ill have to swap to waterfox or something

...

>can't find a counter argument or proof
>l-let's just post a dumb wojak.. hehe you're retarded lol xD

Safari actually has some advantages, it's light on the resources and provides pretty good battery life.

Is this browser any good?