Why the Unix hate?

Brainlet here, I need help understanding this. Why do both average anons and famous people like Jaron Lanier hate Unix

Because it's not only dead; it's starting to smell bad.

>Jaron Lanier

Average anons don't browse Sup Forums and are tech illiterates. People hate shit they don't know.

Wrong.

What are the implications of this?

>Unix
>not dead
Unix died with Sun, user.

I like Unix' best distros, namely macOS and iOS, tho

Because they don't even know what it is. You're talking about people who still think that Windows is "a PC."

>Because they don't even know what it is.
I don't think anyone does. Is it a trademark? is only ATT code? nobody knows!

He's *wrong*? He's quoting Rob Pike, you young, uninformed whippersnapper.

...

Because it is not free.

I hate Unix because they have hindered OS investigation by at least 50 years.

FreeBSD, OpenBSD and NetBSD are still kicking. If you're willing to turn a completely blind eye to every illumos distro shipping with GNU userland by default, then illumos, too.

Those are Unix-like.

The BSDs are the actual continuation of UNIX and you'll find many similarities in the source code tree layout between V7 and your average BSD.
illumos has substantial amounts of SVR4 code in it, too.

>illumos has substantial amounts of SVR4 code in it, too.
It doesn't run on anything that isn't a server.
They won't even take bug reports that are related to server functionality.

Brainlets have always hated what they could not understand. This is no different.

*are not

Yes, and? Are servers not computers?

it's a very niche market
Thus dead. Why do you think Oracle killed Solaris?

>Jaron (((Lanier)))
>t. kike

faggot

Linux is fucking free what

>GPL
Freedom means you cannot dictate to anyone.

>Jaron Lanier
Who?

Linux has nothing to do with Unix.

kek.

>what is BSD
>what is GNU/illumos
[insert Linux copypasta here]
>s/Linux/illumos/g

>I'm glad, i could help Sony and Microsoft to make billions with my code too, though i still don't know how will i pay my electricity bill.

they dont get it. Well, most people
But he made unix :-DD

Does anyone even know what Unix is anymore? Fucking children.

Nope.

>what is BSD
Not Unix or UNIX either.

>Has ATT code
>not a Unix
K, but a judge said you were wrong in 2003 and you're still wrong.

>Jaron Lanier
Literally who?

>Those are Unix-like.
No, they are literary UNIX.
Linux is UNIX like.

Learn2POSIX faggot.

They aren't. They don't even claim to be Unix themselves. You just don't know what you're talking about.

>Unix died with Sun, user.
No more Brendan Greg stuff for FreeBSD.

>>Has ATT code
>Has

>No, they are literary UNIX.
No. They are Unix because they were derived from ATT code licensed to Berkley for research. ATT couldn't sell OS's because the gubermint said so.
Later when ATT could sell Unix they got mad at Berkley and said I"LL SUE YOU!!! But by the time the lawsuit went to court USL sold Unix property to Novell who gave it away as a standard (POSIX UNIX) and not as a product.

Can you expand on this?

>he doesn't read groklaw.
Stay stupid.

Stay mad.

not him, but it's a common posit to say that Unix was and will ever be "just good enough" for most use cases. And it's true.

Security fails,non memory protect areas,shitty,unsafe,bad type system,smell array manager,nightmare string manipulation,no lambda,header structure C as programming language,tiny scripts as programming tool,Unix is toy OS, even MULTICS begins superior.

Is this just a natural feature when one economize software?

LISP should have won.