What is the next big thing in computers?

What is the next big thing in computers?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=D1sXuHnf_lo
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Virtual reality implants.

Cancer and HIV cure.

Teledildonics

Linux on desktops

Virtual and Augmented reality. At the moment they're really quite enthusiast tier, meaning you'd have to be really in to it to get one.

I reckon in 5-10 years there'll be a VR normie explosion.

Direct connection to brain... And after - Linux on desktop

I predict this is bullshit

GNU Hurd. This is the key piece missing from getting linux on desktops

Replacing monitors with augmented reality via desk mounted retinal projectors. (i.e. no goofy glasses to wear.)

Idk something that helps the user with diseases like a mouse that tells you the amount of glucosa in your blood just by using it or shit like that

It's all gonna be about electronic cars

Quantum processor for everyone and the massive hackigs that will come from it.

...

Unemployed cashiers, truckers, marketers, waiters, radiologists, fitness trainers, ...

Large scale apocalyptic system shutdowns by gruops of evil scriptkiddies. Fortune 500 company insiders tell me, their security is utterly broken.

AI camwhores that look 99% real and have nearly perfect speech recognition and synthesis.

Nice one bro

The End of Civilisation.
Deepfakes are here.

Cancer cure already found

That's actually a good idea. Must be fun to work on that man ,,.

Hell, I used Linux on desktops, when Linux was less than ten years old. Given the amount of devtime that went into $$Win32 the Linux desktop is astouding.

INB4 heresy

big data gathering
machine learning
artificial intelligence
eradication of humanity

in this order

I predict a more compact and efficient form factor for hardware like cpu's/gpu's and batteries in the next 10-20 years

I predict government bans on computing more powerful than what we had in 2012.

Deepfakes will ruin the world.

and more

>big data gathering
>machine learning

>artificial intelligence
>eradication of humanity

(Software) security is a joke.

No.

>big data gathering
>machine learning
>artificial intelligence eradication of humanity

We don't even need to go into true ai, neural networks are already enough to destroy everything.
Deepfakes is MORE than just fake porn pictures of celebrities.

That's the only way it's possible to expose this to normies without them tuning out, free porn.
If you can, from a single image of a person, but with a huge database of other photos (not of that person, just of other people, buildings, cars, LIFE (take what say Facebook or Google might have)) create a completely fabricated porn image of that person (which is what 'deepfakes' is to most people)
Then can you not see that you could create, 24 images, then 24 more? and keep going say until you have 2880 images, which you can play at 24 images per second? (Yes, a fucking video)

Deepfakes could make a video of a politician having sex with an underaged girl, combine it with adobe's voco and you can fabricate blackmail, evidence of crimes, evidence of innocence , anything.

If you ever thought photoshop or simple video editing was bad - the world is literally about to go topsy turvy.

Its normie tier now, just too pricy for most, anyone worth there weight in anything but shit knows to stay away from it.

Its know to cause the parts of your brain that dream and recognize 3d environments to atrophy.

>security cam footage becomes next to worthless
>surveillance state falls apart

Why fitness trainers? How are robots going to correct your form?

retard

Unless we change our current way of thinking on computer hardware and subsequently software there really isn't going to be a "next big thing" that is going to be a benefit to the public at large

Making them cheaper and more powerful until computers are ubiquitous in all aspects of life, collecting information about users.

Software optimization, mark my words. Moore's Law ended a while ago now, and the fallout of our "build first, security and performance later" mindset is only just beginning.

I think deepfake porn do the opposite. It make public knowledge that such technology exist. You have to be very, very dumb to think that you can use this only for porn, and even if you are that dumb, sometime you will watch a random video of X person with the Nicolas Cage face. There is already a lot of normie youtubers talking about how can you use it for vad things, including what you said. I think that soon we will have a case when a idiot will black mail his ex with this shit, it will get loads of media coverage and so people will be more exeptical to the next amateur porn video the watch.

This.
As soon as I saw deepfakes I realised all video evidence would soon be worthless. I give it 5 years tops.

>surveillance state falls apart
Why would it? It's not like the state is going to have any doubts as to the authenticity of its own fucking footage. It's not like any court is going to have any doubts as to the authenticity of any footage that the state "promises" is real, either.

>all video evidence would soon be worthless
Log files, billings and other data that are infinitely easier to fake than video are far from worthless as evidence, because there's the assumption that the state / law enforcement / ISP / phone company doesn't have a reason to fake them. That won't change.

>Log files, billings and other data that are infinitely easier to fake than video are far from worthless as evidence
How often have you dealt with the police user, be honest?

I had a fully armed team of federal police turn up at my house because a bomb threat was called in from my land line to an airport and the airport was shut down.

The police literally looked through my phones call history, saw a call wasn't made and left and yes, this is a completely true story.

And that story is supposed to disprove the argument you quoted how, exactly?

Because in the real world the police and the federal police don't give a shit about looking past the surface level.

You've never had a police officer lie to you in an attempt to try and get an admission of guilt when facts support you, have you? Police want to fill their quotas, they don't give a shit.

>cucktum processors

And that supports the original thesis that the advent of deepfakes will make "all video evidence worthless" and lead to "surveillance state falling apart" how, exactly?

Because the law makers who sit above the police will realise their attack dogs could be manipulated by their technology so they will deem video evidence equivocal.

Does your mom still spoon feed you too or is it just me?

blockchain technology will be built into the kernel in the next 2 years making most systems unhackable.

Distributed systems like tor would be cool but seems kinda out of reach. A faster way to interpret genetics I’m also hopeful for.

You convinced me. A state conducting surveillance of its citizens is going to consider its own surveillance data "equivocal" because a policeman once looked at your phone and you weren't arrested, which means police can be manipulated by their technology, which means law makers will soon realize that, which means surveillance state is going to fall apart. Makes perfect sense. I'm sorry I thought your little anecdote was irrelevant and fucking retarded.

Here's a thing - and I kind of blame my idiocy to not having seen this clearly earlier: I always wanted to see, how girls look naked. I thought this is an evil device, that can see through clothes. BUt you do not need that. All you need is a 98% approximation of the body. This is basically 2018 and you don't have to wait for some ultra quantum IR cam in 2030 to be able to do it. Fun times ahead, my friends.

An $5 app that is a personalized fitness trainer always at your side, c'mon.

They did test the "vaccines" just days ago. Worked in 87 of 90 cases.

>It's not like the state is going to have any doubts as to the authenticity of its own fucking footage.
You're making shit points. What if someone (not the govmnt) makes a deepfake CCTV """footage""" of me rubbing a store? Not today, 5 years from now. It will look completely authentic. Who will the police believe? Me saying that I didn't do it or the footage of "me" doing it?

Yeah, in fucking mice and they didn't say anything about the side effects. It can pretty much shut down all your organs for all we know.

Not an example of state surveillance my "shit point" was a reply to. Also:
>what if someone fakes logs of a server being pwned from your IP?
>what if someone photoshops an image of you fucking a minor?
>what if someone fakes your signature on a bunch of documents?
>what if someone swears he saw you fleeing a scene of a murder?

why would hurd's use do anything with linux? theyre separate kernels and can't coexist in an OS.

tree/fiddy got me to reply

This guy lawyers.

>I reckon in 5-10 years there'll be a VR normie explosion.
nah dude it will be much sooner, normies are allready saying shit like
>Virtual and Augmented reality. At the moment they're really quite enthusiast tier, meaning you'd have to be really in to it to get one.

Where the hell did you find this out?

VR will be reserved to basement dwellers after the novelty wears off. Normies will not wear something that obscures the entire outside world more than an hour. As motion sickness is more prevalent in females, VR will become the next media target of toxicity. AR on the other hand will actually be as common as smartphones when they become indistinguishable from the common spectacle.

It could not shut down all your organs for all we know. :^)

>i see what you did there

You didn't. It's an actual word that's been in use since at least the 90's.

youtube.com/watch?v=D1sXuHnf_lo

A big thing certainly, but not quite the "next" big thing.

kms

please source i want to read more

Cluster technology making current hardware infrastructure obsolete utilizing all components available and dynamically managing resource allocation of virtual networks, and delivering a completely cloud controlled interface and network for every operating system used by normies. A-la we back to mainframe

I had a police officer straight lie to me to get a search. Lied in front of my face and to other officers. I had a locked room, was past 18 and paid a small rent to a family member. They were searching someones elses shit (long shitty story not worth it) they still pop my door and run a dog through there and find a small stash and pipe. Motherfucker insisted I gave him permission, looked at the other guy among the dozen cops and he's like yeah he did say you could. But I was fucking adamant and explained I did not and why their search should be invalid and my family members corroborated my initial interaction with him. They backed down. Not sure why, they ended up calling me the street lawyer after that tho which was hilarious.

It completely shattered my world view that day. I was a punk and me and my friends were fuckoffs but I still had a basic faith in the system. Not after that day tho.

my dick

Kek 8/10, user

In case you're stupid enough to fall for this, I've used an Oculus regularly for almost two years. I still dream and my depth perception is quite in tact.

if you cant do the time, dont do the crime scumbag

what's a computer?

It's gonna be my penis OP watch out

Modern CCTV systems don't record as a video file, they make a encrypted program which can be played and which guarantees the footage has not been altered.

Deep fakes and similar programs will make video evidence from mobile phones worthless but they won't affect actual CCTV systems.

hi

Advertising that runs a neural network on your GPU to collect more data about you.