>>64940707

1. Flag
2. 25 years
3. Terrorism and Israel

Other urls found in this thread:

bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-09-11/kerry-brokers-trump-s-plan-for-syria
myredditnudes.com/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

1. Ebin Groß Germaniums :--DDDD
2. How long it's needed to make the decision to nuke Mekka
3. Europe

1. Flag
2. Forever
3. No one, it'd be a perpetual 1984-style war, especially as one against a concept.

Probaly 3 months and 23 days

1. flag
2. as long as the american empire stays afloat
3. jews

But we did not win in Iraq

We did not win in Afghanistan

We did not win in Yemen

We did not win in Libya.

We have not won in Syria.

At a certain point can we admit that we lost?

You can't win in a war like this.

Depends on how dog-headed our leadership is, 2bh.

Hillary will go balls deep into Syria.

Would Trump let it go?

I don't think either Presidential Candidate, of any election in the foreseeable future, would end it any time soon.

1. Flag.
2. Forever.
3. Lockheed.

1 USA
2 It has no beginning, even though the article had a beginning the terrorist and terrorism didn't be it homegrown or foreign
3 No one

The name itself should tell you how complicated they want to to think it is because terrorism is a part of every era before it may not be called that but the mechanism is the same to wage war against this mechanism is a war of information and control, in the end everyone loses but the very top which is also always in transition, an evolution thing really

Not winning is kind of the point of this whole thing.

wrong

wrong

ongoing and not t directly involved

wrong

ongoing

half of trumps campaign is about spooky terrorists. Of course not.

Yay...

If anything, this would result in a detente much like most of the Cold War.

>rong
>wrong
>ongoing and not t directly involved
>wrong
>ongoing

Actually, they all are ongoing if you are going to be this autistic.

America is currently bombing 9 countries.

>The name itself should tell you how complicated they want to to think it is because terrorism is a part of every era before it may not be called that but the mechanism is the same to wage war against this mechanism is a war of information and control, in the end everyone loses but the very top which is also always in transition, an evolution thing really

. .. , ... , ..... .

.

January 7th?
What happens then?

>burgers are this misinformed about their own candidates
if you truly care about the lives of Syrians and others, you should vote trump

...

If you fight they win

Just explaining stuff, no need to get upset

You need to use punctuation.

no I don't

>The solution to any of this is attacking ISIS on Putin's behalf
Pretty sure Trump is rusing us, if not he has serious brain damage

>>The solution to any of this is attacking ISIS on Putin's behalf

You know that the Obama administration is doing exactly that today?

bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-09-11/kerry-brokers-trump-s-plan-for-syria

better than funding "moderate" rebels in hopes of taking down Assad for literally no reason

Obama literally just copied Trump's plan.

LMOA

that is currently what is happening

Is trump a genius?

Because if Obama's doing it, it must be right

At least she doesn't have shit steak or want to talk to the North Koreans like we're making A Fortune 500 deal rather than dealing with the posibility Miami New York and dc might be turned to ash

Exactly. He gets a free pass now that the election is here.

1. When did Trump ever say he would do that?
2. Obama's NK policies have led to 5 different nuclear tests, at an accelerating pace and yield. Furthermore, NK launched over 10 ICBMs successfully the last 2 years. That is something it has never been able to do before.

Now tell me, why has Obama failed so miserably with NK?

Ehh, this isn't like Afghanistan that much, also you think a dictatorship funded by our nemesis is any better

Well letting Russia secure assholes who gass their own people isn't exactly a good idea

The North Koreans are going to perfect long range misiles by 2020 Trump would not be able to react in the needed way of threatening North Korea and bombing their nuclear sites if they don't comply. He has this grand delusion that he's the ultimate deal maker and politics is like running an for profit company something that will cost him the election. His personality would just boost Mr. Kim's ambitions for appeasement

>boost Mr. Kim's ambitions for appeasement

Uhhh are you high? Kim doesn't want appeasement.