>97 commits
>they're all minor edits
97 commits
Other urls found in this thread:
ten.minute.read.io
twitter.com
>what is squashing commits
const const
>every commit is a giant mess that touches half of the codebase
>commit messages like "did the thing"
>inline const constexpr const
I do this lel
>meet a qt nerd
>she talks about how she contributes to open source projects
>I check out her github
>all commits are grammar corrections
Fuck
>Giant commit 250 files changed
>Only changed the logger variable name to be consistent across classes
>Have to review every single file
Kill me
>not immediately pushing every commit you make
grep "+" | grep -v "$logger = new Logger();"
??? no need to look at the same thing a million times
>being this triggered by someone else's fucking github commits
I bet you get mad if their tab size is different to yours
fuck of zoe
>heads up guys, huge commit coming in week
fuck I hate people
>CAN ANYONE TELL ME WHAT THE CHANGES WERE FOR THE EASY TO FIND THING????
>Sure, it's `path/to/the/fucking/file.sh:69`, made with commit `beefbeef`. I found it with the command `git log -S fuckingPattern`. Check this out: ten.minute.read.io
>2 days later
>CAN ANYONE TELL ME WHAT THE CHANGES WERE FOR THE EASY TO FIND THING?????
...
One more proof that women are worthless
>One more proof
You're making us look bad. Become transgender.
Having too many commits is much better than having too few.
Gib autist GF
Isn't const a compile time check?
This change does nothing and probably makes the code harder to read
neo-Sup Forums, everyone
kek, wow
const isn't a compile-time check, and the result of modifying a const (e.g. by casting away constness) is implementation defined. const is useful for readability purposes and keeping the programmer in check.
>'added bootstrap on layout'
>millions of commits
>all const
Honestly we need more people to do boring tedious shit in OSS. Documentation and polish are important.
>inline const constexpr const noexcept