>Samsung’s 2018 flagship is behind apples 2017 flagship
Lmao.
>Samsung’s 2018 flagship is behind apples 2017 flagship
Lmao.
Other urls found in this thread:
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
twitter.com
it's also worth pointing out the A11 isn't just in the flagship iPhone X but also in the second tier iPhone 8+ and iPhone 8 as well.
samsuh at least making some progress, unlike snapshit ....
Please do the needful...
Delete this sir......
Apple's 2017 flagship still doesn't have a headphone jack or an uninterrupted screen.
Samsung has never had a flagship without a headphone jack or with a tumor across the top of the screen.
Please sir buy a xiaomi and stop using Geekbench results like a faggot
Nothing new under the sun, apple is still cheating at synthetic benchmarks.
It's not like hijacking benchmarks is something hard when you have total control over the hardware and software.
>Please sir buy a chinkshit and stop using Geekbench results like an informed consumer
fix'd
>kikebench
post those GPU benchmarks....
Literally every other test but goybench says the opposite. I wonder why...
Damn, how will I run my facebook and candy crush now?
Reminder to report this iToddler shill, he's been banned for an accumulated length of over 5+ years by the mods and still ban evades and comes back thinking he belongs here.
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
As much as the numbers the iPhone pulls are impressive in day to day use I see no reason to get anything over a snap 808 or 630. All this power (On either side) is going to waste. Stop pretending you need a supercomputer to stalk girls on facebook and expose your genitals on a cantonese goatmilking forum.
Go ahead, buy your overpriced garbage brick with the iDent in the display and no 3.5 like the fanboy you are.
>Geekbench
(You)
OP BTFO
Reminder to report this iToddler shill, he's been banned for an accumulated length of over 5+ years by the mods and still ban evades and comes back thinking he belongs here.
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
archive.rebeccablacktech.com
Yes, we know. You already posted that. You spam almost as bad as he does, so you can fuck off too.
Wasn't Apple caught numerous times in the past giving benchmark software authors a tool or program to unlock more power in Apple devices that is otherwise used for security and safeguards?
Literally been doing it for decades.
How anyone trusts synthetic benchmarks for Apple products while real world comparison tests demonstrating startup, opening of system apps and 3rd party apps and games show iPhone's significantly slower than some of the competition is beyond me.
>gookbench
Apple and Xiaomi phones are made in the exact same Foxconn factory.
Geekbench is the only "benchmark" - if you can call it that - where iPhones are "ahead". The A11's probably got some pretty good hardware acceleration of something it measures. The AES performance differs between Intel and AMD CPUs too.