This thread is about the appreciation of horology, as well as The Urban Gentry and the micro-engineering and materials engineering that are required to make a fine watch, clock, or other timepiece.
Are there any differences between the SKX007J and SKX007K apart from the writing on the dial and a higher price?
Robert Thomas
Roger W. Smith.
Henry Murphy
>name brand coward
Hudson Baker
"made in japan (not really tho apparently)" vs made in malysia
thats it
Brayden Gutierrez
That is a interesting piece you have there user, capturing the power of the sun to move those beautiful hands on that beautiful dial. Words cannot express it, it's just so.. Tasteful.
Because they are basically a glorified fashion brand that try to market themselves as a cheap Swiss alternative with the same level of quality.
However from a horology point-of-view they are terrible. Unoriginal designs, pathetic finishing, mediocre build quality and their "in-house" movement is god awful.
David Howard
All the sperging about finishing quality made me curious to take some 1:1 magnification photos. It's always kind of sad to see all the little scratches and dings close-up but I guess that's life, my vintage watches are in way worse shape and I still like them too.
You can shit on the hands and indices all you want for not being as complicated and 3-D as GS or whatever, but it still blows me away how Rolex manages to polish stainless steel to such a flawless mirror finish on the bezel and the sides of the case. It looks just as shiny as the white gold parts do.
Since everyone likes old Seikos here, is there any /wt/ approved watchmaker for quartz shitters? I've been neglecting the KQ and GQ because I had the yellow one service by watchmakeranon a while ago so it's got a nice new crystal and it runs perfectly.
The GQ has some weird problem which I think is caused by the movement hanging up during date change, some mornings it'll suddenly be an hour or two slow but I've never managed to actually see it get stuck. It's also a weird design where the entire movement with the dial attached comes out as one unit when you pop out the caseback which scared the hell out of me the first time I tried to take off the back to check out the movement.
The KQ runs great, I just want a new crystal because it's a little scratched up.
I go to museums. If you frequent a museum collection enough times, you begin to feel like the collection belongs to you. If you really go enough times, you almost get bored by the miraculous pieces you see.
After that, watches and 'things' don't really seem to special anymore. They're nice to look at, but after a while, they're just another thing that you can get bored of. That's the beauty and curse of the human mind....which was something Anons were trying to tell me the other night but I simply didn't listen.
12up is usually the toughest position for a regulated balance movement, especially an unadjusted one like the 6R. COSC chronometer testing excludes the 12up position for that reason (they test dial up, dial down, 3up, 6up, and 9up).
even with real diamond that's tacky as shit. That watch is middle class chinese women personified
Ethan Sanchez
The "made in Japan" ones always have a higher quality standard and accept fewer defects so they are still better than the made in "wherever" ones
Jordan Flores
>The "made in Japan" ones always have a higher quality standard and accept fewer defects so they are still better than the made in "wherever" ones no
Gavin Butler
that pepsi gmt tudor just released is really nice.
no doubt it will appreciate in value. if i didnt already have a nice diver i would jump on that in a second.
Cameron Sanchez
That guy may actually be insane.
Julian Turner
Wrong
Noah Phillips
I've never seen this company discussed here, but I'm curious. Do any of you like Fortis? Or own one? I used to see them a lot at the mall, but the honest truth was that I never knew anyone who owned one.
Their 'busy' aviator designs look nice, to a point...but they always look really thick, too thick to be comfortable. Beyond that, I don't know anything about them, and their reputation is very quiet....So, tell me what you think.
I would've bought one of these if I could afford it, but I'm very happy with my Explorer. It's also new enough to have all the good modern features which is a plus.
There have been a lot of crisis teen actresses posting here lately, they seem to like casio
Cameron Young
That's the impression I had. But I figured someone here might have either had experience with them or known someone who owned one. They seem very....ordinary? They've got great 'tool-watch' looks, that's no doubt...but beyond that there is nothing at all special about their aesthetic. And in all honesty I can't justify at all the prices they command new....
>pic unrelated because I can't find a picture of a Fortis worthy of posting here...
watches are meant to be worn. besides, they can polish those scratches out during servicing.
i would actually look suspeciously on someone with a 10+ year old rolex that had no dings or scratches. like, what the fuck kind of boring ass life do you lead that allows you to keep a watch in pristine condition
Oliver Edwards
I was wondering about that. How much metal is actually removed when they polish out scratches during servicing? I've seen various complaints from people about too much metal being removed...but in all honesty, I can't imagine a watch being worn to a nub if you're realistically sending it to servicing about 5 or 6 times in a lifetime....