Why do (((NIST))) ciphers seem to be the only commonly used ciphers nowadays? So that NSA can decrypt traffic easier? Why aren't ciphers like Two/Threefish, MARS, RC6, and Serpent more commonly used? Is it a comparability or an implementation issue?
Why do (((NIST))) ciphers seem to be the only commonly used ciphers nowadays? So that NSA can decrypt traffic easier...
Ethan Harris
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Aiden Peterson
Stop whoreposting.
Jason Long
>using ((( )))
I can't believe a thread died for this
Jeremiah Myers
>Mommy! user is posting white European women again!
Oliver Brown
>Why aren't ciphers like Two/Threefish, Serpent
Because they didn't win the competition, while Rijindael (the cipher now known as AES) won.
Christopher Mitchell
go back to your containment board
Gabriel Hall
LULA 2018
Isaac White
AES has been backdoored by NSA.
Do not trust it, do not use it.
Carson Allen
White European WHORE
Carson Gomez
ah, right, let's erode the cryptological foundation of the West some more, Igor
Daniel Walker
Hi
Please provide actual proof of this statement.
Jayden Campbell
Don't believe me, faggot?
Read the documents that Snowden leaked. I don't care for the faggot himself but the documents are relevant in establishing a comprehensive understanding of why the NSA has undermined every computing process developed since 1990.
Adam Stewart
Colton Hill
nothing you're saying is news.
compromised PRNG's does not equal a compromised encryption protocol.
no intelligence entity would benefit from having backdoors in a public encryption protocol, as they would be utilized by foreign agencies in three instants.
Christopher Collins
have you even read that document? it's not about any AES backdoors.
also: do you really think that information could have been made public and NOT fixed for years? have you ever done any kind of development whatsoever?
Aaron Baker
>no intelligence entity would benefit from having backdoors in a public encryption protocol
>being this retarded
Why would there be no benefits? If they can crack the most used encryption protocol on the planet, why wouldn't they? Why does NSA use RC6 internally instead of AES?
Aiden Russell
Good taste in titty monsters, OP.
Jonathan Foster
Ah, you ignored where I showed you that you were wrong. Anyways:
>Why would there be no benefits
because they use their protocols themselves. backdoors would make the society they're protecting vulnerable. but you're free to point out the backdoors in the public protocol. the world is waiting.
>If they can crack the most used encryption protocol on the planet, why wouldn't they?
because they don't need to exploit the protocol. they can, as you have seen: all kinds of evil-maid attacks and server backdoor access. "SSL added and removed here".
>Why does NSA use RC6 internally instead of AES?
there's only indication that they used RC6 in one external black-op. in any case, I guess I need to inform you that intelligence agencies use several kinds of protocols for different applications.
Nolan Gonzalez
Who dis
Jaxon Scott
Agnetis Miracle
Luis Jenkins
and obviously: I would never use AES when encrypting shit on a target server if I was US intel - in the same way I wouldn't use GOST to encrypt shit on a target server if I was KGB*
Ryan Roberts
>not using your own implementation of the lattice-based GGH encryption scheme
>not protecting yourself from quantum computing and CIA niggers
Sad that there are so many brainlets on this board
Brayden Price
so what's stopping people from using multiple ciphers?
Luis Watson