What does Sup Forums think of Perturbator? They released a new album last month

What does Sup Forums think of Perturbator? They released a new album last month.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=rZgfrDMQFas
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

I liked them a lot when they were in Hotline: Miami but I'm curious to listen to them outside of that

>They
It's one guy and it's the cream of the crop for synthwave

true, true

too bad he decided to stop that project. But if that means more quality releases from his other projects good for us.
nice false-flagging, faggot

right, sorry, HE released a new album last month.

Electronic music for metalheads i.e bad electronic music for metal children with zero attention span

t. indiecuck from RYM

what on earth are you talking about? are you just using metal as a boogieman completely out of context and relevance?

I bet you think Deafheaven is a good band

are we listening to the same artist?

but RYM is full of children who like metal and Perturbator

the guy has a metal background and I believe he said in an interview once that he listens to nothing but metal.

oh alright then, carry on

slightly 2spooky4me

also justice sounded waaay harder than this planisphere
youtube.com/watch?v=rZgfrDMQFas

the patrician choice

shit compared to this.

I don't think I've disliked any of Perturbator's albums so far. I'd also recommend Dance With The Dead and Magic Sword.

>the guy has a metal background and
yeah
>I believe he said in an interview once that he listens to nothing but metal.
nope

...

I don't really like Perturbator all that much.

Carpenter Brut is better.

Remember when Sup Forums used to like metal?

Now we get this shit.

>liking metal = hurr durr retard child

This album is good synthwave but if you don't like synthwave you won't like it.

It's well made and pretty varied for what it is imo.

Why aren't they a good band? Because you don't like their fans?

Because they make atmospheric black metal without atmosphere and with chugs instead.

Even if they do who gives a fuck? Because people misclassify their genre you think they are bad?

So what you're saying is that they're good at making bad atmoblack and therefore shouldn't be considered a bad band?

you said the make atmospheric music with no atmosphere, therefore it isn't atmospheric music. How can they make bad atmoblack if they don't make atmoblack? You are contradicting yourself.

If you feel they don't make atmospheric black metal music why do you insist on calling their music atmospheric black metal? You're doing this to yourself.

fuck off with your cheap sophisms, will ya?
When your dad makes a lame pun that doesn't make you laugh, do you call his joke "post-humorous" or do you just call it shitty?

it's the same with Deafheaven: it's got the tremolos and the reverb and the melodic interludes but it doesn't have the emotion and the escapism.

You just keep remarking on how it's different and not how it's actually worse. You're so unbelievably hung up on the fact that you believe the genre it's tagged under is incorrect.

>When your dad makes a lame pun that doesn't make you laugh, do you call his joke "post-humorous" or do you just call it shitty?
humor is even more subjective than music

oh then what are you gonna call it then? post-screamo?
Do you think that rebranding boring music is enough to make it entertaining, moving, and interesting?

That's fucking irrelevant. Subjectivism doesn't work in real life.

>still hung up on what genre it should technically be
You're fucking dense.

different people will have a wildly different sense of humor

therefore humor is subjective

and some senses of humor just suck, you know it
it technically IS atmoblack, but it's effectively bad atmoblack

not bad, but as far as synth people go Tobacco is a lot more impressive to me

the only synthwave im diggin atm.

perturbator is good but his fans are cancer
deafheaven are good but their fans and haters are both cancer
/thread