ITT: Horrible reviewers

I'll start with an easy one.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=xgLT94FBfE0
youtube.com/watch?v=luWABvDNTS8
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

all the teens who copy this melon and all their 'taste' from pitcvhfork and the man himself

All critics are shit. They can't create worthwhile art, so they review the works of those who can. Embarrassing tbqh.

t. talentless "artist"

this guy

Don't ever reply to one of my posts again

Honestly this. Its like those films professors in college, they talk smack but many of them have not worked in the film industry before and those who had are terrible at those careers.

...

i didnt know mc ride made music reviews

terrible review but hes ok
i mean critics usually 21 pilots for some reason

>mage.jpg (390 KB, 1920x1080)
>390 KB
Why the hate for Spamthony Vegantano?

>inb4 drones say otherwise

this, except in the rare occasion where the review itself ends up becoming art (Lester Bangs)

Jesus christ i just watched some of this guy.
I seriously don't understand what people see in those kinds of bands he likes.

He seems like an alright guy but his opinions are just awful

...

>He takes off points for it not being challenging enough
I agree

youtube.com/watch?v=xgLT94FBfE0

man chris mercer really let himself go...

Devil quads don't lie.
Also really disappointed by this meme review he has no fucking idea what he's on about.

I'm waiting

what is this

Antiny Dicktano

Cunt

...

How is he a horrible reviewer?
>How is he a horrible reviewer?

>>How is he a horrible reviewer?
>>>How is he a horrible reviewer?

>
>>>How is he a horrible reviewer?
>>>>How is he a horrible reviewer?

>
>>
>>>>How is he a horrible reviewer?
>>>>>How is he a horrible reviewer?

I feel like he explains why in the reviews

CHRISTGAU

>
>>
>>>
>>>>>How is he a horrible reviewer?
>>>>>>How is he a horrible reviewer?

i would fuck that

The value of art depends on the values of the art critic.
Most art is born as imitation, not innovation.
The critic, not the artist, is the one who defines innovation, and rates it.
The artist is merely a vehicle for the aesthetic/ideology of the critic.
The critic is the real artist.

Spotted the Radiohead/Beatles fanboy

yeah, for the 5 people who care about said critic lmao

Can I fuck her ass, her pussy, her mouth, her feet, her tits, her hands, her hair, her neck and so on?

Are there any reviewers that are actually worthwhile?

dude nice

...

You, user

yea yea everyone hating on fantano. i bet every fucking user from Sup Forums watch his videos all the time

You act as if there is a division between imitation and innovation.

Fucking Die, he's the only good critic

mark prindle is ok

I'm going to send this to her

go for it user

youtube.com/watch?v=luWABvDNTS8

marcel is the only good critic

Aww did no one praise you in the band camp and SoundCloud threads?

Besides the memes, I see nothing wrong with Fantano.

This cucklord and his fucking Voltorb on the other hand.....

>he gave Blurryface a 9/10

>hates prog metal
nah he's shit m8

Nice detour

high quality bait

>feet before tits
This user has his priorities straight

Entertainment Weekly.
>Mr. Bungle's debut got a D-
>That album with that "What if god was one of us" song got an A-
Drawn Together was right.

cuck

he wasn't close-minded about it though, he really liked Red

ok there are two

He gave MMLP2 a 6/5 unironically and said that it and Camp by Gambino were his two favorite rap albums of all time (I watched TGWTG in Middle school)

literal trash opinion