Will folk ever be taken seriously, Sup Forums?
Will folk ever be taken seriously, Sup Forums?
It is. Indie-folk on the other hand...
nice answer
Thing is, I just see people respect prog-rock and whatnot way more than folk music
Not if it is always unbearable White
Thanks friend.
>respect prog-rock
if only...
I always assumed it was one of the most respected genres
I like Folk, but prefer it mixed with Country, Blues and Rock.
Prog fans are circlejerkers that try really hard to make it look like it's highly respected. It's rather pathetic actually.
I guess you're right
Prog rock will always be more respected than your dumb indie folk
OP is about folk in general, you dumb dadrock-drone
t. prog babby
>mad indie cucks
Yes and Pink Floyd will always be more respected than Sufjan Stevens and other gay shit
(you)
We're talking Simon and Garfunkel. and Bob Dylan, not that indie shit
>implying sufjan isn't better than both of those artists
what the fuck
pink floyd was influenced by folk
this
So what? Radiohead was influenced by REM. That doesn't make REM good OR respected.
what's gayer, simon and garfunkel or sufjan stevens?
>that doesn't make them respected
>the musicians you list respect them
It doesn't make Radiohead good either
Fuck you, leatherhead.
>I don't know what folk is, yet I still give an opinion about it
it's leatherman
/thread
I wish I could confidently say this was bait
>Many many thousands of years of continuous music making by mankind go unrecorded. All of it that is made outside of monarchical or religious contexts is folk.
>100 and a bit years of recorded music.
>"Will folk ever be taken seriously?"
We tried to take it seriously in 1965, and again in 2011.
Not ever falling for that one again