Objective facts

reminder to all Animal collective fans and Twenty one pilots haters

...

feeshbone

Oh oh OP I've got an even better record for you

but, lemonade is good

Yeah because metacritic objectively defines quality.
Fuck outta here

thats far better than TOP u cuck

5 critics vs 34 critics, hmm

It's good. But good is not 92. 92 is fucking amazing. Lemonade is just good.

Woah even better record 4 u guise

Doesn't metacritic just give the percentage of critics who reviewed it positively? It's not like a teacher grading a goddamn research paper handing out points, right?

afaik that's what rotten tomatoes does. I think metacritic actually calculates an average.

only accurate rating in this thread desu

>tpab
>good

>

>Caring about critic reviews

...

turns out marketing tastes like lemonade

This rating insults me. It should be a perfect 100.

>taking metacritic seriously
Hoo boy

I'm a connoisseur, I've conned you sir.

>comparing the score of an album with 34 reviews to one with 5 reviews

Ba-da-bing, ba-da-boom