What.cd is better than the archive some 1 invite me please :(((

What.cd is better than the archive some 1 invite me please :(((

[email protected]

Please please please

>inb4 snet :^)

snet :^)

SLSK

>What.cd is better than the archive
Yeah, highly debatable.

The selection isn't as extensive as ratiocucks would have you believe. It's all in the name of elitism and
>muh sekrit club
shit. what.cd is pretty overrated.

Also, the forums are probably the worst on the Internet. Worse than reddit, WAY worse than Sup Forums. Just awful.

SOUR

I only trade for timestamped butthole pics

just get soulseek you mouth breathing retard

I'm not saying it's not worth it. It can turn up something particularly rare on odd occasions, the collage interface is very nice, but don't think you're missing out on some underground music utopia in not being invited.

google soulseek

download it

literally thats it its so easy lmao

haha yea i love 192kbps

it's a fantastic site but yeah it's not NEARLY as complete as people seem to think it is.

with that said you're a fucking moron if you don't use the holy trinity (what.cd, rutracker, soulseek)

Rutracker is pretty eh.

I just use it for movies.

i've had great results with it for classical shit so i can't complain

this

either just download it off of blogspot music blogs or use soulseek.

>blogspot music blogs

unless it's some ungodly obscure thing you're dumb

But what has classical on lock. That's one of the only good things in which the selection excels.
P2P is a bad idea if you're living on campus.

I have an mp3 blog.

yea what does have a good classical selection but i've used rutracker for classical for years so w/e

t. Man Who Couldn't Pass The Interview

>ratiocuck
I didn't have to. I got invited.

he made it very clear through context clues that he's a part of the site you dumphy giraffe

Rutracker is trumped by the other two, and soulseek negated if you have good headphones. So your holy trinity is more like a veiled monopoly.

>soulseek negated if you have good headphones.
why do people think this? it's so easy to find decent quality rips for 98% of things, and only necessary to grab lower quality rips when they're the only thing floating around the internet, thereby still the best quality possible

>very clear through context clues
>PT is overrated
>PTs are full of elitists
>PT forums are bad
yeah, that's really clear and can't be said about literally any other private tracker at all. only what specifically

>why do people think this?
All goes back to the secret club meme. Nothing is allowed to be as good as muh private tracker, a free and extremely expansive network of easy-to-download music including obscurities must have something wrong with it, they tell themselves as they pay real money to keep up their ratio in hopes that after weeks of seeding they'll be allowed to download an album Tuvan throat singing bootlegs in FLAC

I've never not been able to find an album on Soulseek, and the "it's all transcodes" meme is untrue, easily avoided by testing in a DAW.

you've never been on there, have you?

>soulseek negated if you have good headphones
Are you retarded?

>I'm incapable of searching past the first layer of results
You people do realize if you see '192 kbps' on a soulseek result that doesn't automatically mean that's the folder you have to download, right?

good job conveniently leaving out the obvious clues themselves but then again they aren't obvious to you since you're autistic and whatnot

also i never said anything about exclusivity, work on your terrible reasoning skills before posting again.

guide to not downloading shit versions of albums from soulseek? I always download either 320 or FLAC, but sometimes they turn out really quiet...

Turn the volume higher

it's probably a pre-loudness-wars release, which is a good thing, ya dingus