Well in pop the whole song is supposed to be interesting. There's usually at least two great ideas, a verse and chorus. Or on the experimental end you have many interesting sections. In classical and jazz they just wank over the one or two good ideas they had at the start. Jazz is the worst for it since the development isn't even supposed to be good in itself, it's them trying to make up something good on the spot which is incredibly stupid since good stuff takes time and effort and doesn't come spontaneously.
Poptism saved music.
Isaiah Bell
shut the fuck up
Wyatt Rivera
>be me >wonder what malinowski has been up to >go to his channel >see this
>In classical and jazz they just wank over the one or two good ideas they had at the start If you cant admire the ideas composers put down to develop these one or two good ideas then maybe classical isnt for you
That's the thing though, an idea that's good enough doesn't require development. There is only so much duration you can have of the highest quality within one single idea. Once that's done you should move to the next idea instead of developing it. Then maybe repeat both and end the song.
Forms like the rondo or even short preludes had it right. What they lacked was immersion, and pop gave it that with human voices, feelings and sounds.
