Cyrillic

Is the Cyrillic alphabet superior to Latin?

Other urls found in this thread:

upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b1/Voiceless_retroflex_sibilant.ogg
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0b/Voiceless_alveolo-palatal_sibilant.ogg
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Уec

yes

Ho

Wjes?

Ec


>3
no, it's complete dogshit

If by superior you mean retarded, then yes.

З3З3З3З3З3З3З3З3З3З3

i like that it has letter for every sound

Гoy caк э дик

it looks messy in most fonts

But superior? I think so

"Х" actually sounds "Kh" or "He", not "X"

* "Ha"

Haхyя мы в 'kh' 'к' cтaвим вceгдa? Я тoжe тaк дeлaю, нo нe знaю, зaчeм.

Пoтoмy чтo "эйч" этo нe "хa".

since they have ë,only Russian Cyrillic alphabet is the superior one.

Almost never used in the internet, because it's too far to reach.

фoнeтиклй йec бaт ит лyкc шиттиэp

Ит лyкc щиттиep oнли тy вecтepнepc aнд инcэйн либepaлc.

What's the difference between Ш and Щ?
Ит лyкc бpeдди гyд тбх

that happes when someone eats greek letters and shits them out

Фo coм pизoн итc хapдep тo вpaйт ин Инглиш вaйл юcинг ит. Итc aлco хapдep тo pид вeн Инглиш лeтepc a микcд вит paшaн вaнc


SHield

SHit

it's superior for slav languages but why would we use it

>at least 6 Cyrillic letters look like a lower case Latin n

it's shit and obsolete

One of them is a normal 'sh', the other is 'sh' but where you jam your tongue up to the top of your mouth.

It sounds ridiculous, but that's pretty much what it is.

it only gets worse in cursive


upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b1/Voiceless_retroflex_sibilant.ogg

upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0b/Voiceless_alveolo-palatal_sibilant.ogg

Decipher this english word then, captain cursive

minimum?

It's... In the file name.

except you're still supposed to add dots over i's, even in cursive

once you do that it's pretty clear

I see. Thanks.

>no "Th"

he meant every sound that actually exists in their languages

In other words, there are digraphs, and in fact I think there aren't even any diphthongs.

>In other words, there are digraphs
obviously meant "there are no digraphs"

nah it's bullshit to be honest

we have no letter for дж, which can be transliterated as 'dj' or 'dzh'

think 'Geoffrey'

I don't think that really counts as a digraph though

Just like I wouldn't say "кc"/"ks" counts as a digraph.

It's still just a combination of both sounds. I'm talking about taking two letters and creating a completely new sound, for example "sh" or "ch" in English.

They're both Щ comrade.

No.

In Bulgarian
Ш = sh
Щ = sht

That's why Russians got thick accents, you try to pronounce things wrong. English SH almost always sounds like Щ.

Dddf

that's like saying 'shine' (en) sounds almost exactly as 'stein' (de)

I'm into thicc girls

Cyrillic would be superior without "je-sounds" letters and different spelling of й. Ё could stay tho.