His language doesn't have gendered nouns

>his language doesn't have gendered nouns

...

Love doesn't look gender

...

...

uh gender is a social construct you cis scum

Ikr

It's time to leave, beaners.

sub-languages, the lot of them

Why do you guys get your own flag?

>his chair has a penis

...

chairs are girls you dummy

but chairs are female

chairs are female

because the uprising will happen soon
>his chair isn't a boy

We are not gay to have male chairs

Literally what's the point

>mfw a gringo tells me "la plato está sobre el mesa"

this actually exists?

une chaise.

la plato está sobre el mesa

Remember Romance languages are all just fucked up versions of Latin. The three that posted there would (most likely) natively speak Portuguese, Spanish, and French all of which came from good ol' Latin.

You can use the same sustantive for different purposes by changing the article.
Or use an adjective as a sustantive without an article to use it in complex sentences where you're describing several individuals.

"Stólurin, hann er gronur" = "The chair, he is green"

vocaroo

Or just simplify all of it and get rid of the gendered nouns.

>he thinks grammatical gender = biological gender

where is anglo?

Literally what's the point

to keep foreigners out

even if they got the rest down perfectly, they always seem to fuck up the genders

what

vocaroo

>even if they got the rest down perfectly, they always seem to fuck up the genders
yes, that's what always gives them away

Exactly.
What is the point of such an inefficient system as gendered nouns?

STOP MALE CHAIRS BULLY

What is the point of such an inefficient system as ungendered nouns?

>his language has articles
>he complains about inefficiency

literally WHAT's the point of having articles?

It distinguishes general from particular.

But besides that, who says we need to use them?

This

release vocaroo britbong

The English use of articles is reasonably predictable and functional. Neither of those descriptors could be attributed to grammatical gender.

It's just a shibboleth really.

This is very stupid concept that hard to explain. Thanks God English is free of this shit.

>functional

how?

russian and finnish are fine without

Thank you Russia, one true friend of Anglosphere

LA JUSTO

see
Functional does not mean necessary. You can do without them but it does impart useful semantic information. Unlike grammatical gender.