ITT: only 10/10 album covers

ITT: only 10/10 album covers

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=glDs5T5TBQw
twitter.com/AnonBabble

I always loved the cover for Tadaima for some reason

...

I truly adore this cover art.


This album got popular because of GTA 3. I think all of the tracks are on KJAH radio
youtube.com/watch?v=glDs5T5TBQw

I FORGOT THE PIC

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

some good album art in this thread, anons.

i quite like this - not a huge fan of the band, but you can't deny it looks cool.

metal always has the best album covers. it also has the worst.

why are you pretending to be montie?

this is so iconic. makes me /nostalgia/.

It is Montie dumbass

No, I am

why are you pretending to be montie?

...

this is only 10/10 because of the content compared to the cover

...

...

How the fuck are these piles of shit 10/10
Get serious you fucknuts

whats your 10/10? i prefer artistic value over Sup Forumscore

...

How does it feel to live in your parents basement cuck?

i'm sorry but you seem like you don't know shit about "artistic value".
i agree that album cover shows some technical skill, and it's not badly made, but in terms of "artistic value" that's nothing but edgy and shallow.
it could be just a matter of one's point of view, but for me, "artistic value" is what does the work contribute to the "art scene", how progressive it is. of course, not all art that doesn't have an impact like van gogh or michelangelo, et cetera, is bad; but wallowing in the old ideas and craftmanship-like evaluation of art (the painter's "skill") is definitely not of "artistic value".
that being said i admire the skill but don't think it's great art.

...

artistic value comes in many 'shades' i guess. for example, down in the cold of the grave. that was created by an artist to represent what he heard once listening to the album. its not just nice art that they put on the cover cause it was badass as fuck.

i may have used the wrong term, but it still stands. im not an artistic person, but to me, skillful art is considered value. i really dont get new wave modern art. to me it lacks interest but thats just me. im more of a traditionalist.

interesting fact, the guy who did that cover also did a large portion of the lord of the rings promotional art.

for example, i think thats just tacky and really unappealing. however i understand the artistic value of it.

top tier imo

pretty cool

...

...

Pic related is far better

what is this?
image search shows no results

...

...

Albur 0.02

...

Nothing better than filk

...

...

...

...

...

Roger dean is a god

My nigga
>Slightly tilted with lame filter
Absolute trash

i dont know man, it can sometimes look pretty cool. look at

Well the lo-fi feel works well with the minimal look of fields and rural environments, but the Lonerism cover feels amateurish especially with the cheesy lens flair in the corner.

hey montie!

innerspeaker is the best TI cover anyway

it's a damn 0/10

get some fucking taste man

captures the sound

Definitely agree

...

4/10
6/10
9/10
6/10
6/10
8/10
3/10
0/10
7/10
9/10
5/10
7/10
8/10
8/10
2/10
8/10
2/10
6/10
8/10
7/10
10/10
10/10
0/10
6/10
5/10
1/10
9/10
1/10
9/10
6/10
6/10
7/10
8/10
6/10
10/10
6/10
8/10
10/10
6/10
9/10

beaut

great

this

...

...

...

...

...

...

Jesus christ most of the album covers here look like shit.

...

10/10 album too

This album rules so hard

...

this would be a 10 if metal bands didnt have such shit logos

...