RIP P4K

Remember when they used to be a website you could go
to and read about music and NOT have to wade through an entire page worth of this stupid bullshit?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=WcSXbvzW91U
pitchfork.com/artists/4042-scharpling-and-wurster/
pitchfork.com/artists/5383-patton-oswalt/
pitchfork.com/artists/862-david-cross/
pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/15015-hilarious/
pitchfork.com/artists/29114-hannibal-buress/
pitchfork.com/artists/5989-aziz-ansari/news/
youtube.com/watch?v=jam_SzaNXds
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

no

rip Sup Forums
remember when faggots like you didn't take screenshots of pitchfork and make threads about them

No

getting real tired of this shit. pitchfork actually used to be good, or at least not offesively shitty. this is some buzzfeed tier garbage.
i don't wanna click it, but i can only imagine how many times they typed "queen" and "slay" in the article.

i remember back in 2002 a forum i was on was bitching about how much they started covering kylie minogue.

so the answer is no

no

thank you for not being a memey dipshit

ok right

But it literally wasn't the vast majority of what they used to cover. The Beyonce/Rhianna/Drake/Kanye (to a lesser degree) bullshit was always more what they covered on the side, and they didn't even ever fucking review a Beyonce album until the one before Lemonade. Now they're acting like that's their primary target audience.

Now if I wanna find news about even the most token indie/"alternative"'artist that used to be their main focus, I have to actually dig through days worth of MTV level bullshit to find it. Fuck that.

They were never GREAT or even particularly good, but at least they did cover artists that I liked pretty competently and with better access than anyone else did. Now they can't even fucking get that right.

They are completely 100% Rolling Stone territory now.

...