1. Beijing, China
2. Seoul, South Korea
3. Nagoya, Japan
4. Kobe, Japan
5. Shanghai, China
6. Shenzhen, China
7. Dundee, Scotland
8. Helsinki, Finland
9. Berlin, Germany
10. Graz, Austria
11. Turin, Italy
12. Bilbao, Spain
13. Curitiba, Brazil
14. Buenos Aires, Argentina
15. Montréal, Canada
Do you agree with this list?
A lot of China in there.
>9. Berlin, Germany
eheh I always knew my city was fukken nice
I only agree with Helsinki and Seoul.
if thats really official this must be a shit excuse or something for "we are fair, arent biased toward the west"
but as you can see, this makes the fact even more clear that they aint have a single interest in asia.
>modernist shit
>beautiful
Pick one
>germanistan
>beutiful
maybe 10 years ago but not now
Beautiful*
No, almost every western European city is better than China shit.
>the top 6 being all asian somehow proves that they don't care about asia
>3. Nagoya, Japan
lol no
I like that there is no grid.
where is saint-petersburg? unesco is just a bunch of russophobes
Helsinki looks like St. Peter except no commieblocks except these.
Lol spb a shithole
>UN
shit
>UNESCO
shart
Polen mad that none of his shithole cities made it on the list :^)
Is this list supposed to be a joke?
Nope. None of Polish cities should be there. But I think there are better cities in Germany.
sarcasm
>china being anywhere on this list
>S M O G
>M
>O
>G
>commieblocks
>traffic
>chinks
are UNESCO retarded?
it's like when they put us as the most livable city, we have a bunch of problems wtf
"Beautifully designed" is a really vague phrase. They mustve made up some bullshit for its definition and its descriptions but still it sounds pointless. "functional" or "urban engineeringly" or shit like that wouldve given it a more clear definition. But they didnt, because they dont get interested in asia in the first place, this is just an ad to show unesco is fair to everyone, or this was just a nonsensical list forced by try-hard unesco azns.
it's beautiful in a way
beautiful if you would like to die of lung cancer at 30
this city has something like 2600 hours of beautiful sunshine a year, and this shitty smog fucks it up
chinks cannot be trusted with anything
>Dundee, Scotland
kek what the fuck
Better than a lot of others on that silly list.
Why is Helsinki there? Only good part is the Senate Square and the surrounding area. Rest is bog-standard nordic shit and we have no good modern architecture to speak of.
It's fairy mystical and mysterious place.
Getting tired of this list
Québec City is vastly superior to Montréal in every respect
>1. Beijing, China ok
>2. Seoul, South Korea wat
>3. Nagoya, Japan ok
>4. Kobe, Japan wat
>5. Shanghai, China ok
>6. Shenzhen, China wat
>bilbao
mother of god, there are like 10 or 12 more beatifull cities in spain, desu
only count "modern"cities, thought. most beatifull cities in spain are "medieval" tier.
>designed
Are any of these cities actually designed? Like most cities, they seem to be just a smattering of infrastructure. I'm sure many of them are nice but far from "designed".
White Curitiba >> White Buenos Aires
China = shit tier quality construction
bilbao its pretty confy desu.
>coming from the home of paper mache-walled suburbs
some traditional cities are like that like kyoto, and some castle towns all over the world can be defined as it.
but technically, its about urban engineering/city planning. not to mention this list doesnt make any sense.
>Buenos Aires
>Not Paris
Buenos Aires is like a retarded failed copy of Paris with millions of people living in slum.
If they want to put a Latin american city then just write Santiago or Rio de Janeiro, but wtf Buenos Aires.
I'm triggered.
>B e r l i n
Why is Aichi the best prefecture in Japan?
Paris is one big slum so they got that right then. Let them eat cake..
>1. Beijing, China
shithole
>2. Seoul, South Korea
awful
>3. Nagoya, Japan
okay I guess, nothing special
>4. Kobe, Japan
not sure, presumably pretty similar to most other japanese cities
>5. Shanghai, China
smog choked nightmare, like all chinese cities
>6. Shenzhen, China
see above
>7. Dundee, Scotland
only decent city in scotland is edinburgh
>8. Helsinki, Finland
okay I guess, not a lot to do or see though
>9. Berlin, Germany
well designed maybe, full of pretentious wankers absolutely
>10. Graz, Austria
never heard of it
>11. Turin, Italy
apparently it's okay
>12. Bilbao, Spain
I've heard this is a terrible city outside of the touristy centre and the museum etc. like most European cities I guess
>13. Curitiba, Brazil
never heard of it
>14. Buenos Aires, Argentina
Yes, I agree
>15. Montréal, Canada
Yes, I agree
You fucking suck UNESCO, go fuck yourself.
you are mad because they are white and the french look like shit smeared brazilians
bilbao is full of moor because the social benfits and wellfare in basque country are higher than rest of spain, so all sandniggers go there to live in wellfare.
so yes, its a moor shithole outside the center.
Buenos Aires and Curitiba are fucking shit.
which one is these is you faggot
me on the left
macaco from rio detected
u r mad because curitiba is a nice safe white city
monkey brazilians hate the south
Curitiba is a nice city but it isn't very safe.
t. Curitibano.
Dumb cunt.
I think this is the first time I see "Nagoya" in Sup Forums
Your whole country is the definition of nice but not very (very) safe.
Are there any places in Brazil that are safe?
>he never came here
we have a lot of architecture from italy, england, spain and greek you retard
The states Santa Catarina and São Paulo are relatively safe.
t. Nagoya naoya
What is so special about Québec City?
Meme list
Needs much more Italy
>13. Curitiba, Brazil
Lmao
t. a chynaman who have korean and german friend, lived in nagoya, like kobe beef and scotch whisky, wear italian clothes, played soccer and ice hockey
UNESCO is completely drunk.
>Dundee
Haram
>more than half of them are generic megacities with identical looking skyscrapers in different shapes
into the trash the list goes
>9. Berlin, Germany