This is not good.
Prove me wrong.
This is not good.
Prove me wrong.
Other urls found in this thread:
sputnikmusic.com
musicianguide.com
indyweek.com
theguardian.com
pitchfork.com
swanfungus.com
twitter.com
I mean, I think it's good. But you're entitled to your opinion
Oh. Well i can accept that. Thanks for posting in my thread.
Nah yr right, pitchfork gave it a high ass score when it got reissued so people had to act like it was the greatest shit ever.
Nobody cared about it when it came out and nobody truly cares about it now. It's entry level "I know things about music now!" core.
I hate it too. Why do you hate it, OP? I can't take the edgy vocals seriously. It ruins the entire thing for me.
OP's parents should have chosen abortion. Prove me wrong.
I have never visited Pitchfork's website and I like this album, AMA
Talkin aboot yourself?
hows the fishin up there
You like bad music. I've just proven you wrong.
i'm not op, so no
I never read pitchfork's Spiderland review and it's one of my top 10 albums.
why didn't my mom ever hug me
I've never read Pitchfork reviews and I'm voting for Hillary Clinton.
same but literally
Pretty good, from what I've seen! I personally don't fish, but New England sure has a lot of fishers, and I live close to the Atlantic coast. Lobster tastes pretty great, I'll tell you
I'm sorry to hear that. However, I'm afraid I don't have the answer to your question, as I never experienced that myself. It takes one to be one, and all that.
Thank you for sharing, but I do not have a strong opinion on this year's presidential election one way or the other.
kys lol
Not a question.
What makes you think Pitchfork has anything to do with this album's notoriety? You're right about the album not making much of an impact when it first released, but I know from personal experience that allmusic.com gave it a 5/5 rating long before Pitchfork was ever relevant. If anything, it's music journalists in general -- not just Pitchfork (assuming they count as "journalism") -- who have kept this album afloat through the years.
Proof?
You can find a lot of articles about Slint over the years. There's an extensive interview with Jeff Mueller of Rodan, Jo44, etc. from 2011, one of the questions asks him about Slint and their impact. Don't be daft.
the album is critically acclaimed literally everywhere. the only reason p4k sucked it's dick is because they wanted to hop on the bandwagon, stop giving that shitty publication so much credit
>critically acclaimed
Proof?
sputnikmusic.com
musicianguide.com
indyweek.com
theguardian.com
pitchfork.com
Articles as far back as 2000 were praising this. Pitchfork was even talking about it as far back as 2006. Stop posting.
swanfungus.com
>"What was your experience like in Louisville? The generation that's there now seems to revere a lot of those bands dating back to Crain and Rodan and Squirrel Bait, or Slint."
>[Jeff] takes a final drag from his cigarette and stamps it out before he begins to answer. "I suppose, at the front end of Slint, and even now, throughout whatever international acclaim they've garnered, that's always been a happy aside. In Louisville, certainly at the beginning, at the end of the 80s, and at the beginning of the 90s there was a certain amount of," he furrows his brow, "really frenzied energy, when everyone was doing something and it wasn't really about getting out of the city as much as it was about doing stuff in the city. Louisville exists in a place where it's three or four hundred miles away from any other major music area. We lived on that island. Before I was involved in music I was going to see music. Crain was probably the most influential band for me. I lived with Jon [Cook] and Tim, and they practiced in my house. Being there and seeing that happen was such an inspiration for me. Seeing them work, practice three or four hours a day, four days a week, working really hard to make something solid or good, was a really positive experience for me as far as exploring my own creativity. And that holds true for more than a handful of other bands brewing at the same time."
>"Slint is Slint," he says. "It's a three-legged monster that kind of rambles on and on and on and on. One of my favorite bands, and another enigmatic subterranean creature. Them being somewhat friends of mine, I had that inspiration as well. Here's a band doing all this stuff that I never saw, and that's making all these things that I felt really positive and good about and then there was Crain working all the time, and I got to see the process. The onset of music, for me, was just about watching everyone else do stuff."
Fake.
That's a matter of taste.
>pleb mucore isn't good
Excellent work detective.
>Review was in 2014
>Being this young
I kind of like it but his vocals sound like Weird Al when he screams
...
Shut
Hey, you're entitled to your shit taste. Now go back inside, Don.
Reminder that people who can't appreciate math rock need to get a calculator.
If you're not a Klansman or some neocon elite, what reason could you possibly have for voting Hillary?
Cmon boys, this album changed rock music. It washed away all the shit from '80 rock music, free from all the mainstream structures.
Without this album probably there would be no post-rock.
Spiderland is the second and final studio album by the American rock band Slint. It was released on March 27, 1991, through Touch and Go Records. Featuring dramatically alternating dynamics and vocals ranging from spoken word to shouting, the album contains narrative lyrics that emphasize alienation. Spiderland was Slint's first release on Touch and Go, and the group's only album to feature Todd Brashear.
Do you like built to spill? I like built to spill
Not him, but I too like Built to Spill
>I have no idea what I'm talking about: the post