Why doesnt canada, australia and new zealand just form a union with UK...

why doesnt canada, australia and new zealand just form a union with UK? they are basically the same anyways just like some regional differences in say france or germany

...

...

no but for real prove me wrong
pro tip: you cant

Why doesn't Sweden, Finland, Norway, Faroe and Iceland don't just form a union with Norway? They are basically the same anyways just like some regional differences in say France or Germany

Like the Commonwealth?

I'm pretty sure the only reason we aren't still an Empire is that nobody wants to open their borders to India.

not really we have different language and culture.
norway and sweden is comparable to portugal and spain for example, things like iceland & faroe are even futher away

india is completely different, its not from english roots like these countries so it wouldnt be included

What are indo European roots?

Also a Norwegian and a swede have a closer lifestyle than an Australian and a brit

Fuck off
We get heaps of pommie immigrants here and they bring the sjw bullshit that ruined their country here, and they think they're better than us because they have a faggy accent.

It was part of the British empire. And Punjabi's are proud as fuck, not to mention they died for us in those two wars. There's no way we'd reboot the empire without at least part of India.

Besides, India is a democracy which was created by the British empire and has a common law court system. Just because the people there are brown doesn't mean they aren't British.

But right now they aren't Canadians. They aren't Australian either. And I don't think either of those countries would be willing to open their borders to a billion of them. It's a shame though, most India is a bro-tier country.

australians and brits are all british, they come from the same place and through time seperated with a few differences
sweden and norway were seperate countries for most of the time with over a thousand years of development constantly at war, swedes and norwegians have a much bigger difference than australians and british.
they are complete different people, canadians/aunz etc moved from the british islands to their current lands and brought their traditions and cultures & became the biggest group there but in india the native population is dominant there, almost no decendants of colonists left and they kept their own culture

politics arent a valid argument to seperate people

>Sweden and Norway were separate countries for most of the time
>politics arent a valid argument to separate people

Gotta chose one and stick to it.
Also I talked about lifestyle, how is your daily life any different than the one of Norwegian?

>different culture
It all looks the same to me

typical muritard, im not surprised

Don't worry, Finland.
We can tell you apart from the others.

the modern swede male

He's right in the sense that the differences between Scandinavian people is not bigger than the difference between Anglo countries.

This except not with Canada, they're way too seppo

Canada isn't Anglo

I'm not sure who you could compare French culture to though outside of French colonies.

different countries means each country evolve on its own in a different path than its neighbour creating a unique culture, nothing to do with politics

about life, one huge difference is the language that we dont share, we dont share the same literature and so on too.
anglo countries tend to have the same cusine too which norway and sweden does now.
there are more difference between rules and norms between these two countries than anglo ones and the list goes on.
norrland & skåne is what england & australia is, they are very different yet in the same country and has alot more shared than norway & sweden does

Australia is literally the best example of the natural limits of national borders

We're not going to go annexing Canada just to satisfy some Swede's autism

why doesn't canada just form a union with china? they are the same anyways

does not*

why dont you form a union with mexico?
ok ignore canada it has quebec and shit in it, the rest are still alike

Nah bud, we'd be annexing you kangaroos. Maybe import some moose for shiggles.

Belgium have the same divisions you just talked about and is one country.
Saying American and British cuisine are the same is just retarded as fuck btw

For more serious talks instead of just this stupid circle jerking. Let's admit a united commonwealth, who decides?
Whose interests will go first? It's easy to exploit people at the other side of the earth since we don't see them and therefore won't feel empathy. That's the reason why colonies wanted independence.

A good exemple of that would be Bangladesh who was part of Pakistan but decided to become independent because the government of Islamabad neglected them.

WELL FUCK YOU BUDDY
WE'LL FUCKING TAKE YOU THEN YOU CUNT
YOU'VE FUCKING UNLEASHED THE BEAST

i never mentioned america, its far from british nowadays with all the immigrants from germany, italy, ireland, etc

as long as you threat them like your own people (which they are) there wont be problems, no special privileges or less priviledges, they are citizents like everyone else in the country
the only thing bangladesh and pakistan had in common was islam so its not strange they saw them as foreigners

I guess I don't understand the point.
What do any of these countries gain by uniting?

>as long as you treat them equally
People are already unequally treated in each of these countries. How do you expect this to change by merging them?

relevance, unity, less restrictions so fourth
its capitalism there will never be full equality, but they will all have same political rights, the same chances at becoming someone, there wont be a hinder for anyone because they are from another place than the isles, they will all have the same rights to influence the goverment.
just like in any country

He's talking about the Commonwealth Realms rather than the Commonwealth as a whole