Who is the most patrician female musician?

Who is the most patrician female musician?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=lJJW0dE5GF0
youtube.com/watch?v=8SU0gFPMwP8
youtube.com/watch?v=K7g-VeD2kkU
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

sshx

the female version of thom yorke

Bjork

I wanna do stuff to Anita btw

kate bush

bjork or joanna

joni mitchell

doji morita

B.J. Örk

I want to insemenate anita

If we mean skilled musicians then Sheena Ringo and Phew are prolly better than most males tbq.h senpaitachi

I want to stick my dick inside her Jew nose.

Hildegarde any other answer is objectively incorrect

i saw a post about sheena ringo yesterday and now im interested. where do i start famm?

Wrong.


youtube.com/watch?v=lJJW0dE5GF0

There's not a female singer on the planet with more talent. This song was written by mozart to be the pinnacle of human vocals, it goes through every single range that the human vocals can reach

Catrin Finch

siouxsie sioux

To add, whether you like it or not, whatever music you like doesn't require one sixteenth of the talent.

Liz harris

patrician =/= talent

>he listens to music to be impressed by the range of the instruments being used
cringe

while that lady's voice is impressive, i agree with

...

youtube.com/watch?v=8SU0gFPMwP8

Emilie Autumn

wow dude good point

>opera singing
>patrician

adorable little pleb. How about you go ahead and list 3 artists you like

Not to discredit her talent. But what she does doesn't require any talent in composition

Go back to Facebook, you retarded normalfag.

...

Vine is the worst invention of the 21st century.

Meredith Monk

das it mane

Also Meredith Monk

Fair, then i'd have to go with
youtube.com/watch?v=K7g-VeD2kkU

That's not Bjork, or whatever "unique" hipster vocals you listen to.

UI is the most pqtrician :

...

vashti bunyan
linda perhacs
lisa germano
pj harvey
goldfrapp

>he ranks escapist activities

You dont belong here

I don't need see all the stupid, unfunny images you found on iFunny. Please fuck off.

What the hell are you talking about? I'm talking about the app Vine and how it sucks.

...

Björk

you're a bunch of sad little men.

If you're talking about Sup Forums being an escape from real life you're in denial. Escape means to get away from, you can't escape from something you're never at. If these kids did something OTHER than sit on Sup Forums then it would be an escapist activity

duh buh guh

What a cringey faggot

Every activity is an escapist activity you drooling moron.

>females
>patrician
Pick one

...

Holy fuck, thats the most retarded not true thing ive ever read

>campaigning
>helping out communities
>tutoring
>getting involved in general
>escapism
Thats about as much retardation as I can handle for tonight

This guy goes to UT Chattanooga with me, I have seen him on campus a few times.

wendy carlos

More casualties of The Last Messiah not being required reading in schools worldwide baka

No, She Ruined her voice and looks

PJ Harvey

Probably the only correct answer ITT

I don't understand that image. The kid is just speaking retarded gibberish that doesn't makes any sense, and Dawkins asks an unrelated question.

Is this a meme or something?

the hat man tips his 4 u friend

the kid is pointing out Dawkins' fallacious argument.

No. No hes not. Hes making an entirely unrelated observation about some fucking playdough

This, easily.

t. infidel

How? The playdough pony can't see or hear him because it's not fucking alive, you retard.

>things only exist if they're alive

That's the point. Being unable to perceive something doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Denying this is pure scientism

Atheists are spiritually dead, you are only fully alive once you have accepted Christ as savior

its Lucia Dlugoszewski btw

>composer, performer and inventor. She created over a hundred musical instruments,

The pony cannot see or hear the child yet the child exists which is equivalent, as the image so rationally implies, to humans who cannot hear or see God, yet He exists. In God's eyes, we humans are nothing but clay ponies.
Dawkins, flustered by the child's beautifully simplistic reasoning as to why God exists, can only muster up a laughable non sequitur in order to mitigate the cognitive dissonance still resonating inside his feeble mind. He claims that someone must have made God in order for Him to exist (not true by the way). Watch out for him friends, I fear that his argument getting blown out too much might cause him to attempt suicide...

WHAT? HOW DID HIS ARGUMENT IMPLY ANYTHING CLOSE TO THAT? HOLY SHIT

>not being able to precieve something doesnt mean it exists
Ok, and? Theres literally an infinite number of things we potentially cant precieve, so what makes god any more believable than interdimensional elves or unicorns?

The word of God Himself friend

>Being unable to perceive something doesn't mean it doesn't exist
That doesn't mean it does, either. Especially when there is no legitimate evidence to prove so.

I also dont precieve harry potter. So does harry potter exist?

He exists right here.

>Being as cucked by scientism as the hell bound shit's itt
Read a book for once in your life

Sorry user. I went through the whole christian thing most of my life. I use to tell myself there was a god, go to church, pray etc. After a series of terrible things in my life though, I did real soul searching. I looked inwards and outwards, searching for any sort of message or contact with god. I found nothing. I discovered it was truly just me

>The pony cannot see or hear the child yet the child exists which is equivalent, as the image so rationally implies, to humans who cannot hear or see God, yet He exists
None of this means that he exists. The kid is unintentionally saying is that the object is completely incapable of knowing whether or not the boy exists. Just like how a person is incapable of knowing whether God exists.

>He claims that someone must have made God in order for Him to exist (not true by the way).
Why is that not true? Because you say so? Nothing has ever even remotely implied that the law of conservation of energy applied to God.

ok

pretty much the only proper answer in the sea of waifuposting and other assorted pop musicians being thrown out

add Sofia Gubaidulina and Kaija Saariaho up there as well

>not beliving in god is scientism
Holy fuck you are uneducated. Youre telling others to read, yet clearly the theologists itt dont understand the basics of philosophy. The "you cant precieve it doesnt mean it doesnt exist :P" is pathetically elementary.

Wrong. Not believing on God isn't scientism. Not believing in God because you lack legitimate, objective, etc evidence is scientism.

>Not believing in God because you lack legitimate, objective, etc evidence is scientism
No, its agnosticism you colossal fucking retard

People who think religion and science are incompatible know nothing, read some philosophy, plebs

There's a difference between not taking a stance whether God exists or not because you lack evidence and believing God does not exist because you lack evidence. Agnosticism is the former.

Where did I or anyone itt say they believe god does not exist? Oh wait, they didnt, youre using a manipulative argument in a desperate attempt to save yourself

Bjork probs but Weymouth also a good desu

Make out w/ me

All I did was give you the definition of agnosticism you autist.

You equate not beliving in god to beleving there is no god, which is a false equivalency. All I did was argue why I dont believe in and the you kept arguing "b-but scientism! You cant prove there isnt a god!"

No, agnosticism does not mean you don't take a stance. It is about knowledge, not beliefs.

One could be an "agnostic atheist," which is what pretty much most agnostics and a lot of atheists are. Agnosticism just means that the knowledge to claim a God, a divine, or any all-powerful supernatural being is unreachable.

>All I did was argue why I dont believe in god and you kept*

>from politics baiting to religion war
Never change Sup Forums

nigga I'm a different dude
You're blowing up at me for literally no reason because I didn't even make an argument relevant to your buttrage

ok thanks for the info

Perfect

Charge your fucking phone.

it's a rule that you cannot take a phone screencap unless it's below 50%

Probably Neko Case or Molly Rankin. Anyone who says Grimes or Lauren is objectively wrong