NBA Finals Predictions

>mfw the Memeoirs sweep Lebeta in 6 games

Other urls found in this thread:

sbnation.com/nba/2011/5/31/2198658/nba-finals-2011-odds-miami-heat-dallas-mavericks
covers.com/Editorial/Article/277492
si.com/nba/point-forward/2014/06/02/nba-finals-odds-spurs-heat-favorite-2014
si.com/nba/point-forward/2013/04/19/miami-heat-odds-nba-title-finals-thunder-lakers-spurs
si.com/nba/point-forward/2013/06/04/nba-finals-odds-miami-heat-san-antonio-spurs
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>sweep in 6 games
>sweep
>6 games

Fucking meme fans are the worst. Just start following basketball last year, huh? A sweep means you don't lose a game so it's only possible to sweep in 4 games. Do us all a favor and stop posting, just lurk more till you learn the sport and its terminology.

>sweep
>in 6 games

i don't think you know what that means my friend!

Nice counter-meme

i for one hope the warriors sweep in 7 to see the final game full of lebeta tears

Real talk would 2-5 cement lebron as the biggest superstar level choker of all time?

It would cement him as an Eastern Conference babby more than it would a choker. The Cavs aren't even supposed to win

the warriors have a significantly better team and should win. there isn't much else to say.

>mfw reading cuck lowe this morning

>He is also 2-4 in the Finals. That mark is not as damning as the implacable, cherry-picking critics would have you believe. James has played well in all but one of those Finals, and in three losses, his teams fell to clearly superior opponents. Oscar Robertson, an undisputed top-10 all-time player, made the Finals just twice in his 14-year career.

LeBabbies like him just don't get that 2-4 isn't brought up as residual anti-LeBron hate from the Decision (which was 6 damn years ago, most people are over it). The thing about 2-4 is that it's indicative of the fact that he built his supposedly top-10 of all time career in the worst conference in NBA history.

>sweep
>in 6

Lad...

we've been saying this for like, the past 3 years. he's -been- there. there's no other superstar that's lost like this

the truth is the team that should win usually does and the team lebron is on usually has less good players outside of himself than the other team. there's nothing more to it. everything else is meme shitposting.

Lebron carries teams that would likely be perennial first round exits in the west without him to the finals. Then his TEAM loses to a better team and he gets all the flak for not outplaying 12 people and the media gives westbrick and durcant a pass for not being able to 2vX

I put close to 60.000€ (500.000kr) on Warriors winning game 1 tonight
The quota was 2.3
Did i dun goofd?

>Lebron carries teams that would likely be perennial first round exits in the west without him to the finals.
>taking a max player off a team would make a team much worse
No shit, retard.

And it's not even true, his Heat teams were the most stacked teams in the league each year.

>sweep
>6 games
go fk yrslf

prove it

Warriors sweep in 3.

those heat teams were not the most stacked each year. and never as stacked as mj's 3peat bulls were. warriors this year are far more stacked than any team lebron's been on.

Why?

>those heat teams were not the most stacked each year.
They were the title favourites each and every year Lebron was there. No other team could match their star power (Lebron, Wade, Bosh - 3 franchise players on 1 team) and a great cast of role players (Allen, Birdman, Battier, Haslem, Chalmers, Miller)

>They were the title favourites each and every year Lebron was there
nope


>No other team could match their star power (Lebron, Wade, Bosh - 3 franchise players on 1 team) and a great cast of role players (Allen, Birdman, Battier, Haslem, Chalmers, Miller)
their bench was thin and several teams matched their star power.

Warriors in 7.

>nope
This is a literal fact. They were Vegas favourites to win it all before every single one of those 4 season.

>their bench was thin and several teams matched their star power.
The only other team that had 3 superstars was the Thunder and it was way before Harden was one + they were all like 22 years old.

But sure, please name those several teams that had 3 franchise players on their rosters.

Uncle Toms get stomped

Game 1 - Warriors
Game 2 - Warriors
Game 3 - Cavs
Game 4 - Warriors
Game 5 - Warriors

>This is a literal fact. They were Vegas favourites to win it all before every single one of those 4 season
preseason favorites are utterly meaningless. they were favorites in 2 out of 4 years they were in the finals.

>The only other team that had 3 superstars was the Thunder
every team they faced every year had 3 superstars and a deeper bench.

spurs, mavericks and thunder.

>spurs, mavericks and thunder.
holy shit hahahahhahahahahaha

?

Who exactly do you consider superstars? JJ Barea? Jason Terry? Kawhi in his 2nd year? A 50 year old Duncan?

Get fucking real.

All guess the score and review it after the game?

109-105 Warriors

103-94 Cavs

spurs- duncan, parker, ginobili, young kawhi and a whole roster full of guys shooting over 40% from 3

mavs- kidd, nowitzki, chandler, terry

thunder- durant, westbrook, ibaka, harden

all three teams had two more superior starters and vastly deeper benches along with three superstars.

If this is your definition of a superstar then Ray Allen, Shane Battier and Birdman were superstars too

lol no

ray allen could only shoot threes. his contributions were no greater than any sniper off the spurs bench.

shane battier is almost equal to any of those three team's lesser starters. and birdman lolno. he was a band aid due to the fact they had no true center and got fucked in the post.

>his contributions were no greater than any sniper off the spurs bench.
His contribution was literally the greatest shot in NBA history

>this fag in here seriously trying to argue that the heat werent favorites every finals they were in

goddamn LeCuck fans are so fucking annoying

You could argue they werent favorites in that last spurs series, but they were favorites in everything else

yes he made a game winner. spurs had a whole bench of guys like that. note that if they had a better team they wouldn't need to be shooting a game winner to win.

they objectively weren't. there's no 'argument'. more lebron hatetards in desparate need of a new strawman to attack.

>spurs had a whole bench of guys like tha
They had a whole bench of the best 3 point shooters in NBA history? (at that point at least)

3 point shooting doesn't carry over year to year or else Curry would never have become the GOAT.

ray allen on the heat played as a 3pt specialist role player equal to any sniper on the spurs.

and if the heat were better, they wouldn't need game winners to win.

Warriors sweep the fuck out of leflop in 5.

>and if the heat were better, they wouldn't need game winners to win.
Or maybe if they had an actual top 10 all time player instead of >le 2-4 soon to be 2-5 man

yeah it's the best player on a team that never even makes the playoffs without him that needs to be better rather than the supporting cast....

They objectively were heavily favored to win it in 2011, OKC was SLIGHTLY favored only because of the heat choke job. Heat were Favored AGAIN after that, and AGAIN after that

Keep sucking LeCucks cock though when he's 2-5

I already posted that they were favored twice and underdogs twice. They won twice and lost twice. You are literally retarded aren't you?

Nice quads

Cavs in 6

Miami made the play offs in 3 of their last 4 Lebron-less seasons (and 7 of their last 9). The one season they didn't they were the most injured team in the league.

did you think that was a legit response tho the post you quoted? you sound butthurt retarded

>2011
Heat favored
sbnation.com/nba/2011/5/31/2198658/nba-finals-2011-odds-miami-heat-dallas-mavericks

>2012
Thunder favored
covers.com/Editorial/Article/277492

>2013
Heat favored
covers.com/Editorial/Article/277492

>2014
Spurs favored
si.com/nba/point-forward/2014/06/02/nba-finals-odds-spurs-heat-favorite-2014


that's:
heat favored 2x
heat underdog 2x

didn't read your drivel narrative past that.

Hey guys, remember when the Chosen One hand picked 2 of his buttbuddies to form a super team together, promised not 1, not 2 ... not 7 championships and then ran away after getting 2 along with 2 of the most embarrassing Finals defeats ever?

3rd link should be,
si.com/nba/point-forward/2013/04/19/miami-heat-odds-nba-title-finals-thunder-lakers-spurs

why does it make you so buttmad when a player picks two buds to play with rather than it be some rich owner putting three stars together?

>autistic bickering over some stupid terminology that probably isn't even that important

Wew lad, I guess this semen slurping sport isn't for me

dammit wrong link again,
si.com/nba/point-forward/2013/06/04/nba-finals-odds-miami-heat-san-antonio-spurs

Buttmad? Lol no, I'd be buttmad if they had actually gotten 7-8 rings like Lebron promised. Instead I'm literally lmaoing at those 3 chucklefucks after they delivered the greatest Finals meltdown ever vs the Mavs and suffered the heaviest Finals blow out of all time vs the Spurs.

how in the world do you think losing to the spurs one of the most embarrassing finals defeats ever? it wasn't even slightly embarrassing

i genuinely don't understand you guys

Fuck off.

Lebron will posterize someone, a top 5 dunk in his career

Sweep is a term used in all sports that has serieseseses of games

>losing the Finals by the most lopsided score ever
>not embarrassing

bruh you are a victim of meme on meme crime

so why is it funnier to you when a player who stakes nothing but his desire to win instead of a winner who spends his entire existence putting together star talent and fails?

in context, lebron is relatively successful. higher ups are constantly trying and failing to put together a team capable of winning a chip and lebron did it two out of four tries.

>instead of a winner
*owner

Owners don't hold nationally televised specials to announce they're leaving they're hometown team

Owners don't average 1,5 points in the 4th quarters of an NBA Finals series

Owners don't flop and bitch to the refs after every other play.

Owners aren't shoved down our throats as "the next Jordan" since the age of 16.

Owners don't get all the excuses when things go wrong and then all the glory when they finally go right.

etc etc

40% of those aren't lebron's doing, and the last one isn't even what happens. I see more people giving him shit for being "unclutch"

owners do all of this and then some. all the marketing campaigns, failed signings, etc. all them.

based Polska blowing lecucks the fuck out.

It's not a choke if he's only been favoured to win in twice series

...

he's actually won about exactly what he should have. losing to the memeiors won't change that. it just gives lebron hatecucks more failed logic to spread to fellow retards on facebook.