Ask an actual communist anything

Ask an actual communist anything.

Why do you think people would care?

How's mom's basement going?

hahaha roasted

...

Why haven't you installed Bernie Sanders as the new chairman of the US?

>682851181
The fact that you say "roasted" as an insult makes you worse then the red bastard

0/10
There is no real communism and i dont think they have internet in cuba.

How does it feel to not have private property?

You're embarrassing the rest of us, comrade.

Did you just green test instead of replying?

didn't knew they had internet on gulags, how's that equality going?

How does it feel to be mentally 16

how are you comrade

Are you communist?

...

According to the Black Book of Communism, you people managed to kill north of 90 million people the last time you ran things.

Why did you reply to this thread?

Funny joke.

Irrelevant.

How so?

Equality through communism has not been perfected in practice yet. Communism will win once implemented correctly. Soon.

I'm wonderful. And you?

Indeed.

Refer to

Why do you hate freedom?

What made you realise democracy wasn't the answer and the only way to go is an armed revolution?

You just can't talk communism in front of the murcans. They call you names and are cucked by the bourgeoisie.

Plus "ask a commie" makes you come across like an attention-seeking faggotry.

>once implemented correctly
the only objective of communism is leaving everyone poor so they can't fight back, they already did that pretty well

Okay I'll bite.
>What's your definition of Communism?
Some people interpret it differently than others it seems.

Communism seeks to make us all slaves to the state
Socialism is the way 2 go Comrade

Not that guy, but revolutionary socialist.

why aren't you a libertarianist?

Communism is an ally of freedom, not an enemy.

Maybe not armed, but what enlightened me about communism is when I was studying politics in new york, and discovered the manifesto.

I'm sorry that you feel this way.

How's the 9th grade going there, Timmy?

>Americans

>Freedom

Pick one and read up on neo-marxism if you haven't already.

How's your famine going?

I: To see what kind of horrid conditions you live in.
II: To have a good chuckle.

Also, no need to be so rude.

Incorrect. If founded with good timing (referring to the state of the country) and the right amount of resources, communism would succeed. My apologies for not going into detail, I am trying to answer all responses.

My definition of communism is a stateless brotherhood where man helps his fellow man. Obviously there is more, but this is a very simplified version.

Because I believe that government should control more things than just the police, the courts and the jails.

I don't understand what you're implying. My apologies.

The famines have been because of lack of resources and corruption, not communism itself.

I'm not trying to be rude. Sorry, comrade.

Donald Trump, you are a gangster and which supports your chair, smell like sulfur I vote for those that never chose the easy path of history, i vote for Martin Luther King, i vote for David Dellinger, i vote for Sean Eldridge, i vote for Rosa Parks and for Eleanor Smeal, i vote for Nelson Mandela, I VOTE HILLARY.

>My definition of communism is a stateless brotherhood where man helps his fellow man.
So isn't that basically Anarchism then? Is there an actual difference?

>Be me
>Ukrainian peasant under the Russian Empire
>FML.png
>A few cool dudes come to my eyes
>They promote the idea of communism
>Perhaps now, us Ukrainians will be treated as equals!
>Fast forward a few years
>Bolshevik victory
>Cool beans
>Wait, Stalin is now in charge
>Still okay with this
>More years later
>Starving as fuck
>DamnItStalin.gif
>Have to eat literal shit while Russians are having a good giggle and stuffing their faces
>Communism
>Equality
>10/10 Treatment

The difference is that there will be a necessary government included, made to help and help only. Would you like me to go into depth?

Who you are speaking of is of a fraud and an embarrassment to communism. That is Stalinism, not true Communism.

If you can take the time sure. I'm a libertarian leaning classical liberal. Hearing other somewhat extreme views interests me.

good one user... that fucker just got slayed

Jake how the fuck did you end up on Sup Forums?

I feel very offended and angry. I myself study and practice Communism. However, I think we need a bit of a government. Not to control us, but rather to protect us all. Or do you ask for murder in the streets and chaos to take the lands?

The government would control basic things such as the courts, education, military, etc. Basic stuff. Religion would NOT be banned, but rather there would be a COMPLETE separation of religion and state. The fellow proletariat would be happy and work as hard as he could to support his community, while be taxed for his work, and he would be able to live freely with his fellow man in prosperity with a good amount of resources.

>More?

You reds are more chill about back talk than SJWs/feminazis

Also bump

I agree. I said stateless, not government-less.

Jake wtf if it is you then do you remember the contract we signed today?
OP please respond

okay just specific questions.
What about trade between countries? Wealth redistribution? Such things would be heavily regulated no?

Your picture makes me sad.

Do you want me to describe to you what the touch of a woman feels like

OP is kind've a moron, different commie here. There are no other counties in a communist society. Before world revolution there will be a socialist state, but this is not ideal and not the end goal for a communist. The USSR was a shitty socialist state because they didn't experience capitalism before their revolution.

Oy blin, why no reply? Just want to know if it's who I think it is
OP pls reply

Where did OP go?

Also bump

Are you prepared to murder the reactionaries?

I am not Jake.

Indeed, but with a lot more liberty than you think. In the past corruption and mismanagement have ruined the utopian communist economy but an actual communist economy would just regulate certain things agreed upon by the community. One aspect of communism that I would change, though, is that international trade be encouraged. It is better to globally trade. I could go into trade among the country if you wish.

I was going to go into that. Then again, you are most likely more knowledgeable about this than me. My apologies.

Sorry for being slow guys. I've been kind of busy.

Have you met the proletariat? They really are too dumb to run things.

Oh, ok. Thanks for confirmation tovarischch, bye

Here are my ideas of how the perfect government would be.

Vote upon everything instead of letting others decide for us.
Make every person economically and socially the same.
Make education free and required for all.
Have our careers and education decided for us so that the money isn't a wasted kindness.
Publicly flog and execute any trouble maker.
Have the media tell only the truth. No more lies to corrupt the common man.
Give everybody the same house, clothing, and all that would make anybody different.

These are my views. Take them as wisdom or simply as a sight into my mind. I care not which you do.

Nah, I need to go eat dinner but thanks, it's been interesting. You haven't changed my opinion at all but you've given me some good insight which I appreciate.
Also, you might find this cool. I have a communist era rifle under my bed (SKS). It has a commie star stamped on the receiver.

Indeed. Thus, the harmless government.

I agree except with the sameness. Communism supports equality, not sameness. Everyone should be able to receive what they'd like, act how they'd like, and absolutely NO flogging. Government should not harm its people. That is not communism. All of your other ideas I agree with, though.

That's groovy, comrade.

Do you think the US will ever split in the year 2149 because of President Adam Ross' decision to dissolve the Republicans with Social Democrats of America?

No.

Besides the nonsense, the U.S.'s democrats make much more sense to me than our republicans. Insult me if you wish, and I know he won't be president, but I agree with Sanders the most.

Do you think a violent revolution is necessary in order for socialism to implement itself into the United States?

...

Not a harmless government, an ineffectual one. One that would inevitably be commandeered by a sociopath.

Its a b communist party up in here

Where'd you log on to the net, Comrade?

How do you feel knowing that the main reason that communism and anarchism is flawed is due to the human nature of betrayal and overpowerment? Take stalin/lenin's relationship per example, with the sudden takeover of the politburo and betrayal by stalin and its "brothers"

Absolutely not. A peaceful and demanding revolution is necessary, of course, but violence would just hurt the cause.

What sort of medication are you prescribed and why haven't you been taking it?

If you're OP and you're a communist, that's not what communism is. Otherwise my apologies. You sound more like a utopian.

Ridicule me if you must, but it is true. Pure Communism has not been completely put into effect. Instead just botched, harmful implementations.

Irrelevant. Communism, I agree, will most likely not work in the near future. Right now, there is too much corruption to spur a harmless utopian government.

Ay, comrade.

I live in the U.S.

Refer to the past answers. Botched implementations, not real Communism. Too much corruption.

But by showing what happens to those that step out of line, the common man is not tempted to commit such acts. And individuality breeds hatred for others. Racism, sexism, and many other forms of discrimination are a result of not being like the common man. Similarities do a fine job at killing of at least a bit of hatred.

Funny.

Communism is indeed a utopia.

I love you

Over 100 million dead in the last century. You must be so proud.

Once again, governments that harm their citizens for not being alike that say they're "communists" are not actually being communist. No violence.

Communism is gaining utopia through violent means, and ruling totalitarian till it is established there is no need for government. It always fails because the totalitarian ruler usually has no intentions of reaching absolute utopia. You sound like the people Marx distastes.

How do I know you're real and not just a communist bot?

" Pure Communism has not been completely put into effect. Instead just botched, harmful implementations."
This is the denial that has been prevalent since Stalin's atrocities became public.

I love you too, comrade. Join the cause.

Before you say anything, please refer to the last answers.


OP here, to be clear, I may be only 95% communist. My definition includes global trade, internet access freedoms, and no violence at all.

Once again, these so called communist leaders have been very foolish. They did not know how to properly run their respective countries.

How so?

How is it irrelevant? Its the ground of what communism means. While it works in theory, communism will never work pratically, and the proofs are all in front of you. Name a single free communist dominant country where there is a stable and fair relationship between government and society.

How so?
How else can communism's failure worldwide be explained?

Neither did Marx. And I doubt you would know how to properly run a country either. Communism can't exist properly and will never reach the final stages unless it relies on other forms of government and ideologies.

My friend, bless your soul. For your mind is fragile to this world. Violence is sometimes needed to end more violence. Or do you rather call for a police force simply asking murderers not to kill? Or are you asking for crime to be legal, no matter what it is? A man left to do his own devices will likely do horrible things, so he must be held back in the name of humanity. No matter the cost. We as a species must reach total unity or face more wars and the human race destroying itself. I pray that I may one day give some of my freedoms up in the name of humanity.

I agree with you. It is beautiful but... yes. It will most likely never work.

Indeed. It relies upon capitalism. It starts as capitalism, then a revolution, then socialism, then finally utopian communism.

" I pray that I may one day give some of my freedoms up in the name of humanity."

You have, but not in the name of humanity...whatever that means

I know, don't worry my friend. Utopian non-violence will be almost impossible to reach. Which is why I, as a communist, do as much as I can to help the cause, to help us become a more communist utopian society, year by year.

It's not "Stalinism" you stupid, ignorant teenage edgelord cunt. There's no such thing as "Stalinism".

IT'S COMMUNISM UNDER STALIN

German National Socialism isn't "Hitlerism"

American Democracy isn't George W Bushism

The Westminster Parliament isn't Henry the VIIIism

The ideology of Communism fails because it reduces everyone to the lowest common denominator, everything is over-regulated to the extent that you have to pay for a license and seek government approval to do anything. To get a job, to travel, to write a book, to wipe your arse. Communism doesn't allow anyone to reform it with any ease because of its' ridiculously primitive administrative structure .

The only instance of it ever working is in China and it is only "works" because Communism is marginally less fucked up than having a dozen or so feudal warlords constantly fighting against each other.

If you're a think you're actually a communist and that this is a good thing then you lack life experience.

Your point? You're not giving up freedoms, you're just sharing them to better your society.

That's fair, but I doubt we'll reach a point of utopian communism. Social democracy I believe is the closest we'll get to a "utopia". Revolutions are near impossible with the military against you.

"Indeed. It relies upon capitalism. It starts as capitalism, then a revolution, then socialism, then finally utopian communism."

Lenin ditched that nonsense at the outset.

It means to have a bit of my individuality stripped from me in the name of unity. In the name of the common good.

You just said you'd pray to give up some freedoms

Are you Black?

Do you thank capitalism for taking part in inventing the internet? Not an argue ment against communism or anything

I like to pee on people in public. There's a perfect moment when they don't yet realize what this stream of foul smelling liquid is and why it is hitting them in the face.

Will communism help me pee on more people?

No but it'll help others pee on you

Perhaps I may one day help to serve within the infrastructure of the CPUSA and help to represent them.
Remain calm, my friend. You shall one day see what I mean.

What freedoms? Freedoms is a meme. What you're really giving up is your property and your rights.