Underrated Wrappers thread

Underrated Wrappers thread.
>These types of wrappers are the easiest to open. Imo.

Bump.

Here is a empty wrapper.

My favorite wrapper

This is a nice thread, OP. Sorry I don't have a wrapper to contribute but i'll be lurking.

...

Void. It's awesome.

The faggots that think it's a primitive class can DIAF.

The wrapper class named Void is not a primitive wrapper class, specifically because void is not a primitive data type. WTF is up with some anons?

Fap, fap,fap.

What kind of language needs a wrapper class for void?

...

Here is an empty one

A language used for programming computers, that's what kind of language. Do try and keep up.

I dunno m8, maybe I'm missing something here but I'm fairly sure I don't need a wrapper class in order to return void in Perl or C. It does seem to act like a primitive because it's invoked just like a procedure that expects to return any other primitive.

Here is the wrappers for the wrappers

I used to get so hyped when I heard this wrapper was coming to town, I would rage out with my homies and tear it up. I mean we would go ham on the town hangin out with this wrapper, booze, candy , strippers, cake, the works...Nowadays, the homies are all gone so it's just me and my wizards hat this year, might not even get to see this wrapper ever again...

...

...

...

...

...

K&R calls and refers to it as a type, and it can be used as a type, so I'm going with "it's a type"

...