Hillary is a criminal

>Hillary is a criminal
>Bernie is a buck-passing socialist
>Trump is a child with a temper

Can we just not elect a president?

Oh and....

>Ted Cruz is the zodiac killer

Other urls found in this thread:

ontheissues.org/Gary_Johnson.htm
youtube.com/watch?v=Y8QEYj4Yjv4
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Always Gary Johnson

OP here. Mah nigga. Gary Johnson was the man. Like a less radical Ron Paul. Too bad no one will ever take a libertarian seriously.

Ya honestly love hearing cunts fall into this bullshit two party system and hate both candidates, but in the end support the 'lesser of two evils'

i dont think its a matter of him being a libertarian, i think its a matter of party loyalty fucktards falling into the same trap year after year

Gary Johnson is a retard, wants to end public education and social security

...

>(you)

>ending social security
how is this a bad thing? boomers can go fuck themselves

Sanders, Stein 2016

actually not true, he knows SS is valuable and is for reforming it, not ending it

Like it matters who sits in the big chair. USA is run by big business through corruption, or lobbyism as you like to call it.

>implying social security will be able to exist in 20 years

Also

ontheissues.org/Gary_Johnson.htm

False. He wants to reform public education by eliminating the Department of Education who takes 16¢ for every 11¢ they give.

>believing in the creation science of economics

Not with Trump, he accepted no deals and his campaign is all self-funded.

faggots like you are the reason this country stays shitty

...

Who are you voting for user. I'll be glad to tell you why you're a fucking retard.

...

...

...

...

He wants to eliminate public education and give people money to spend on schools that they wont be able to afford

"self funded" kek he is actually smart on this, he is not self funded

all of his campaign donations to himself are loans, which he is paying all back with donations from the people

dude isnt paying a single time out of pocket

So, you think he will pay senators to vote in his favour on envry legislation througout his presidency? Haha

...

...

...

Im glad to inform you that im nott an amerifat, so dont worry.

...

Okay, but your comparison kinda makes Sanders sound like best option. Like, he at least has actual political beliefs (something ironically rare in a politician)

...

...

What about Kasich?

yea, cause 40 hours of 7.25 without taxes would totally be middle class...
you logic is impenetrable

...

You guys realize you can write in Bernie (if that is who you decide to vote for) or Kasich or whomever doesn't get the primary nominee on the ballot and that counts.

Education is not a business, you fucking retard!
Benefits from education is EDUCATED PEOPLE, not money! For fucks sake!

Jesus christ, thinking like this is easiest way to have completely uneducated braindead populace who are too stupid to work at McDonalds, because making coffee requires you to at least know at what temperature water boils!

Fucking hell, libertarians would gladly bring about Idiocracy in name of free market. I hate this planet sometimes.

>government stops paying people back the money that they paid over the years they worked
>good idea

pick one

seriously do you understand what social security is??? perhaps you are thinking of welfare or something more along those lines.

Spotted the room-temperature-IQ high school dropout.

I voted for Gary twice back in the 90s and early 21st. I also voted for Bednarek once. Yes I'm old why do you ask?

Implying that it means anything and you're not wasting your vote between the two main contenders

At least he has policies. Like, what exactly Trump is planning, aside from The Wall?

Go to public high school. It's basically free. Then eliminate student loans so universities will have to lower tuition or else they won't have as many students. Go to cheap community college or save up some money and collect scholarships and grants. I know for a fact my university didn't need a brand new football stadium. We fucking suck at football.

I think Ted Cruz is basically insane, but he probably would've made the best president out of the last handful of candidates.

Write-in in presidential elections is unfeasible.

You'd need an enormous grassroots movement across the entire country to be able to even get people to KNOW they can write-in.

70% of people who will go vote will pick from what's on the ballot.

...

so•cial se•cu•ri•ty n
A type of Ponzi scheme.

>hurr at least he has retarded ideas!

>waste of a vote
Still better than voting for either Trump or Clinton

... Public high school. Is. Public education. You know, the kind that would be eliminated.

Are you retarded?

better a corrupt politician than a corrupt sub par business man with no experience in politics or anything involved with the job he is campaigning for.

Lol trump be like "We have alot in cummin. Yo Husbin"

>implying our presidents haven't been criminals and five year olds in the past without resorting to socialism

So... did this guy need that sign? If this guy was some bizarre alien that could only eat signs, and was starving, sure, why not.

>self fulfilling profecy

Neh. Just make better deals, works evry time....

call it what you want. You stop paying people what they paid into for years and the shit will hit the fan

youtube.com/watch?v=Y8QEYj4Yjv4

...

>being this deliberately obtuse

That's all any candidate does, just for different groups.

...

No, it's not.
Most people don't care about elections. That's the scary truth, and probably biggest problem with modern democracies worldwide.

Maybe, to some degree people identify as "democrat" or "republican" - but then again, this isn't very deep, and they will just go up, and vote for whoever democrat is gonna be on the ballot. If it's gonna be Hillary, those votes will go to Hillary.

That creates a problem - let's say 60% of the country wants a democrat president. 30% will pick Hillary, and 30% will write in Bernie. Remainder - 40% - will pick Trump. Trump wins, even though majority of the people didn't want him.

That shit already happened in UK not too long ago.

Poof, Hilary. Also that chick was in a video about liberals who shoot guns for the first time, she practically had an orgasm shooting a shotgun.

Except that most of the other candidates have proposed actual solutions to problems instead of fairy tale economics like Bernie.

A vote for one's conscience is never a wasted vote.

spotted the arrogant millennial with zero knowledge about economics... Let me break it down - people who work 40 hours for $7.25 are not inexperienced teenagers, they are adults. Making $7.25 an hour means you NEED welfare, food stamps, etc. And, welfare is paid by taxpayers - SO... jobs that pay $7.25 are essentially being subsidized by tax payers. How does it feel to pay for Walmart's and MacDonald's bottom line with your taxes? sooo advanced

Except they didn't.

The reason it's a Ponzi scheme is because the current beneficiaries aren't just getting what they put into it, they're also getting what the next generation put into it, and the next. That's why there's nothing left. The Boomers have stolen the future of their children and grandchildren.

Just shows how ignorant and retarded libfucks are even as they shout others down and pretend like they're so fucking smart.

>hurr durr work at McDonald's
>hurr durr the department of education doesn't take my money and they are the ones educating people, not the schools
>hurr durr I can't afford a high school diploma. Please help me.
>how do I argue?

1/10 for trying

Yes the SS is valuable......

We have a slut in common.

>spotted the arrogant retard who jerked off and smoked pot in school and then became a NEET instead of getting a fucking job

>thinking people who earn minimum wage get scheduled to work more than 39.5 hrs a week.

>implying

Public high schools are affiliated with the department of education but they could run without it or at least without it sucking money out of people.

>let's make everything a part of the government

Nope

wait wait wait...

So you argue that welfare, food stamps etc. come from the taxpayer's pocket... That's true. You're absolutely right.

But then you claim that FORCING companies to pay a higher minimum wage DOESN'T come from the pockets of those same people who pay taxes?!

HOW FUCKING RETARDED ARE YOU?!

Not that I care for the cause of these hippies, but that argument is flawed because it says "evil corporations" and you just listed corporations without proving they are evil.

That's too simple, prices over/under the equalibrium can be good or bad depending on whether Said person is a buyer or seller in the market for a specific product

...

pay the workers more... we pay the same, but just not in taxes

People who work 40 h ours for $7.25 and are adults are fucking losers. Why should I have to subsidize their shitty life decisions?

My parents are divorced, one's an alcoholic, they both make < 30k/yr. I'm about to get a doctorate and will be making basically a guaranteed > 100k/yr. Explain to me why 30%, 40% etc. of my income should go to retards who didn't want to better themselves and figured a job at McDonald's was a good way to support their family.

i get paid $25 and hour, bub... im just not an idiot like you

i don't get the funny picture

You completely missed the point.

The hippies are arguing against all corporations and calling them all evil...

Meanwhile absolutely everything in that pic is provided by corporations and willingly paid for by the hippies in voluntary transactions called "sales"...

Thus proving the hypocrisy of the hippies position.

The pic is not arguing that corporations are evil. The pic is taking the hippie argument that "corporations are evil" and demonstrating their hypocrisy.

I think calling Cruz a theocratic leader is a massive overstatement

Yeah, I love when people think that a drug defines a person's intellegence. Steve jobs smoked plenty of pot and took lsd. If your smart before you do drugs you will still be smart after you do drugs. Just like if someone is an idiot and smokes pot, at the end of the day they were an idiot before they took up smoking pot

You see the problem isnt the welfare programs for the poor, we give far more to corporations who record record paying profits year after year.....most of walmarts employees are on food stamps and live in HUD housing while walmart brings in billions in profit every year....know where your anger should be placed

Btw i support trump on most issues

i know right? we'll relocate them all in one spot, and get trains to ship them off to work camps so they wont be so lazy. y'know, just get rid of them. good idea! why hasn't anyone else thought of this?

That is not what socialism is, lmfao.

First of all, socialism is not necessarily realize by welfare. This chart ignores moden ideas like guaranteed income, where every citizen would get a guaranteed monthly income, skipping the problem. It would also remove problems of minimal wage, disability payments and free internships, since you would be able to more or less survive without a job. Inb4 parasites - homeless people in capitalism currently cost governments a shitton, because of having to police them, house them in jails or in hospitals, even ingoring charity money that is enough to keep them alive, but not enough to let them contribute to society in any way.

Letting them have a life and potentially contribute to economy sounds like a better solution.


And your capitalism chart ignores clear problem - push to lower the prices suggest cutting every possible expense, including worker's wages. This results in consumers getting less and less money to buy things with, which results in firms concentrating on producing goods cheaply in "cheap countries" and selling them in "rich countries", single handedly creating the "Third World countries".

Second, it also ignores that laws of supply and demand don't apply to things you need to live - people ALWAYS need food, medicine, housing, to some degree education, and won't ignore those things regardless of cost. This allows to drive up price of those things without limit - resulting e.g. in modern college costs in US going into multiple thousands of dollars.

...

So...

Argument one:
1. force companies to pay their employees more
2. which destroys their profit margin
3. ????
4. the companies surely won't increase the cost of their products to compensate!

You're stupid.


Argument two:
The corporations ARE made up of and owned by citizens. If you force those corporations (especially mom-and-pop shops and sole proprietorships) to pay a higher minimum wage then WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE IF THAT AMOUNT IS PAYED IN TAXES OR JUST PAID TO THE WORKERS? YOU'RE STILL TAKING THE MONEY FROM SOME AND FORCING THEM TO GIVE IT TO OTHERS.

You're stupid.

And greedy.

And an asshole.

What about me who is the owner of a small construction business. If I start paying someone who is only just a helper $15 an hour that will mean that the guys who are doing the harder work like carpentry will only be making a few bucks more than their helper. Nobody will want to do a shit ton more work for only a couple bucks more than the guy who just helps them so I'll have to pay them more which means I'll have to charge the company that hires us more money. That means that company will have to charge whoever wants the job done and we already have enough problems with those people not having enough funding for the projects. That will mean less jobs coming up for that company to bid less jobs for us to work then slowly we might have to let people go because we don't have enough work to keep them.

why is all about drugs? i dont deal or do drugs. what are you into that you are so quick to accuse?

I'm a hippy and I believe in capatilasm. I just think we should all do more in our own lives to help the environment and give be a productive member of our communites. Not all companies are evil, but there will always be greedy ones that try to cut corners

...

you can pay more for stuff to compensate workers or pay more in taxes for entitlements... I feel workers need more and corporations need less

>if your smart

alanismorrisette.flac

>being an adult
>earning minimum wage
You're doing something wrong if you have such a little amount of skill that you can't even get better then min wage as an adult. Why force companies to allocate more resources to individuals who have little to no economic value ? Doesn't really fit into the big picture.

people dont work 40 hours for $7.25. if an employer is going to pay minimum wage they sure as hell arent going to have people working enough hours to be entitled to benefits. minimum wage workers almost always work 39.5 hours a week, max.