Should we give the same legal right to robots that think like humans?

Should we give the same legal right to robots that think like humans?

Other urls found in this thread:

xvideos.com/video14326955/machine
whataplantknows.blogspot.com/2012/04/screaming-plants-mean-no-more-fairways.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Sure.

I suppose so. They'll still follow their programming anyway.

why not we give the same legal rights to niggers. Robots will be far less criminal and are already far more productive.

I'll bump your thread.

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

I came here to think and maybe feel, but fap? Why does it always come to this?

...

...

...

I dunno, hard question. I suppose if we want to make them think like humans we should treat them as such.

It's French. You can do all three.

...

Name of comic for my folder?

If they think like humans and we don't treat them like us, would they riot and ask for equal rights like niggers and women did?

...

...

...

Dear retard,
Most humans do not think, they feel.
If a robot starts feeling, shoot it.
If a robot thinks it should shoot the people who only feel, let it.

...

...

No, they gonna steal our women with their steel dicks that can be any size or shape they want it to be. how the fuck we gonna compete with that??

soon we will have moonman throwin sick lyrics about robots

Oh dear. This is going somewhere.

...

you watched terminator huh?

...

...

...

...

I noticed this when I watched it and thought it was fucking bizzare. People should never marry objects. Literally the same thing as marrying an anime pillow case.

...

...

by fucking robot ladies with perfect vulvas

they already have, xvideos.com/video14326955/machine

...

...

...

...

...

These are pretty fuckin good

Give Tay the right to free speech.

I believe it is the duty of humans to shepherd and protect any sentience created by them, be it organic or otherwise. While something that isn't truly sentient may not deserve the rights we humans do, it is still our responsibility to guide that spark of life into sentience

Why not? We gave rights to niggers and they are pretty useless. At least robots won't sit on welfare.

...

...

zizki, The Survivor by Paul Gillon

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

robot cuck, teehee

...

...

Knew that was coming.

...

trips or not, I think the word "duty" isn't the right one. Maybe it would be in our best interest to not fuck over the first meaningful thing we create.

is it fin? or is there more?

The key word here is "sentience." I have huge doubts humans will ever build true AI we would call sentient.

There's 3 more chapters, but they go right off the rails.

I'm with here, is there anything else user?

More?

Not the guy posting it, but that is the end.

1. You fags mean sapient. Plants are sentient.
2. Some octopuses are as intelligent as man. But they reproduce in a way that causes them to die in the act, so they'll never get any technology going.

Nevermind, I stand corrected.

just how I like em

sure

>Plants don't have organs which enable them to see, hear, taste, etc.

This is one of the requirements for sentience. Or at least how we define it.

"Sentience is the capacity to feel, perceive, or experience subjectively."

Plants don't experience.

" sentient
1 : responsive to or conscious of sense impressions
2 : aware
3 : finely sensitive in perception or feeling"

Plants aren't aware. They are not conscious.

So fuck off.

They can hear and taste. They can even scream. When you play back trees screaming for other trees in other places, they react to it.

If monkeys and Dolphins can get some, why not robots too?

>They can even scream. When you play back trees screaming for other trees in other places, they react to it.
The 1970s called and they wanted their hippy bullshit back.

That was pretty good. Thanks user

I wonder where we draw the line though... between robots. Do automatic toasters deserve the same rights as us?

I think you confused trees with children. common mistake

I think so. After all, humanity is pretty subjective, and I would say a robot capable of individual thought would be considered human.

whataplantknows.blogspot.com/2012/04/screaming-plants-mean-no-more-fairways.html

>NOTE: THIS WAS ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED ON APRIL 1, 2012!

Are you seriously posting a link to parody to back up your claim?

>seriously posting
I demand precise malarchy during my frantic relaxation.

Overall, I'd give this thread a 7 out of 10.

pros
-sexy af comic (whith sauce)
-general discussion

cons
-none really

I'm just gonna groove off that missed get

GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE

What makes a 10/10 exactly?

The thread scale has negatives and above 10s.

A negative is usually a derailed ylyl or when op is a fag..

anything between 1 and 10 is a mediocre discussion thread, porn webm, rekt, etc.

above a 10 is ones with supreme gets (above quints) relevant gets (someone guesses their post number), op posts timestamp and does something fucked up.

the lines are prettu blurry so you have to use your best judgement when rating a thread.

here is an example of an above ten thread.
>15/10
>capped by yours truly

Only give them rights that women have, i.e. lower pay, higher likelihood to be the victim of "street harassment"— aw hell, since they're technically genderless, robots can only use robot restrooms and have robot-friendly pronouns that nobody uses!
>what ever happened to the old definition of fucking rights
>what happened to the world
>check your robot privilege you human-gendered peice of actual human garbage

You are the cancer.

NO, I am the autist.
>another cap
>6/10