How is loli legal? for all intensive purposes loli is fucking CP. it is drawings of children being raped...

how is loli legal? for all intensive purposes loli is fucking CP. it is drawings of children being raped. surely this shit can be outlawed

Other urls found in this thread:

pomfpomf.moe/doujins/27/
law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466A
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>for all intensive purposes
Kill yourself

so if i draw someone who's being killed, i'm a murderer? should i be arrested?

nice bait.

maybe because it doesnt actually hurt anyone? i suppose thats why hentai beastiality is legal. just taking guesses here

I second the motion.

Let us discuss this matter further. Post more so we may see the scope of the matter in greater detail.

Top kek

>intensive

Intents and purposes*

Fuck off!

pomfpomf.moe/doujins/27/

It's illegal in the US. But not enforced very strictly if I recall.

after we make homosexuality illegal. if we are going to thought-police we might as well start with what doesn't increase the population and causes aids.

Under the rule of the constitution Drawn porn loli is protected by it, because art.

it is porn with no children involved so there is no child porn in it. Just as Genki is not octopus porn it's porn including octopus charackters

it is illegal you fagboi
law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466A

Only in some parts.

I bet Texas has it illegal like butt sex.

Prove me wrong.

because the cp law is made to protect the image of the exposed child and not to punish the audience. without the legal object there is no crime.

...

JUST GOOGLE
18 U.S. Code § 1466A - Obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children

...

I agree, but even if it saves only one kid from being actually molested or raped Im fine with it

B A I T

I personally don't give a fuck what people fap to but i just hope people know it is illegal to own/distribute loli

...

...

bullshit. its physically impossible to fit inside such a young girl

...

...

...

Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly produces, distributes, receives, or possesses WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUT, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that
—
There is a fine line between sharing and distribute, but it still exists.

...

I'll just leave this here... es2adizg32j3kob5 (dot) onion

...

Technically it is
It's illegal federally but rarely enforced unless found with real child pornography, sort of like jail bait girl images

...

Drawings are not reality, when you outlaw fiction you are going against the freedom of speech of others. Confusing a drawing or a book, ideas or anything that is not real to actual reality has even a medical name, it is delirium, it is when people cannot differentiate between both.

So It is only illegal in countries where freedom of speech and creativity are greatly censored, shit countries like the US.

see
this dude is clearly distributing child pornography

...

>intensive purposes

I hate this loli shit too but come the fuck on

If you are going to dump, post real lolis not those dwarves.

...

Toddlercon is best -con

this one is ok, i'm not into chubbies.

...

18 U.S. Code § 1466A - Obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children

How about dis?

Toddlers are da bestest

...

...

Good thing these aren't children, dumbass. Look up the definition. Do these look like "Real and identifiable" to you? These are drawings of figments of the imagination.

You should try to shut down Hollywood with stupid logic like that, since, you know, all the murder, rape, and all. Since you're so worried about figments of the imagination and fictional characters.

...

...

how can a drawing have an age?

>Uses freedom of speech as a shield for loli porn

...

...

loli is art. plebs don't understand.

Straaaiiight up

To be fair:
Purpose: intention or objective
Intent: intention or purpose.
Intensive: thorough or vigorous

So, intents and purpose = purposes and purpose
Intensive purpose = thorough purpose

It's a common enough mistake since most people consider intent and purpose the same thing. Granted purpose is the point of the object, intent is the reason for it.
I.e. a Gun's purpose it to shoot a bullet, it's intent is to make sure OP kills them-self.

...

It's a doggy dog world out there op

...

It's illegal i Sweden

Show me one instance of these drawings growing up to be contributing members of society and I'll agree it's messed up.

...

...

They're drawings you nigger

everything good is illegal in Sweden

>"it's illegal in the U.S. But not enforced very strictly if I recall"
>"it's illegal fagboy"

Kill yourself user

Don't get me wrong, I'm all about lolis, but when you're bringing the first amendment into it... It doesn't matter to me man. My phone, PC, and google drive, which isn't encrypted, is all flooded with this shit, and nothing has happened to me so I'm not worried about it being illegal. It's pretty hard to get arrested for doing shit on the surface web as long as you're not completely autistic

No, dude, just no . It completely changes the meaning.

It's intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.

"all intents and purposes" is completely inclusive. "All intensive purposes" is specifically ONLY the intensive purposes.

...

why is CP illegal? no one is hurt in loli, cp cant say the same thing

Yeah I agree, heroin addiction is a horrible thing that causes aids

...

Well, Sweden is obviously too busy turning into New Iraq to do anything right.

>I.e. a Gun's purpose it to shoot a bullet, it's intent is to make sure OP kills them-self.
>missing the point.
>entire thing was for a joke.

Lolicon is OBJECTIVELY the most satisfying thing to masturbate to. You honestly have some sort of degenerative brain disease if you think otherwise.

2D porn is best porn, no women hurt in 2D porn.

I don't care about loli, but put anything in there instead of loli and it fits, loli will only not fit for you because you are offended by it, in the end it is just a drawing and fiction, it is something that didn't happen in reality.

The only point you made was show me that you are okay with censoring stuff you don't like and you can't differentiate between reality and fantasy.

Even in japan there are tons of people that cringe at loli and shota stuff, but they know it is just fiction, just drawings so they don't give a shit, because they are not retarded christian moms in the US.

...

My hard drive and google drive is full of cp/jb and nothing has happened to me. Must mean those things are legal ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Loli hurt too, they can injure your wrist.

i totally agree with you that it should not be illegal. but it sadly is
"visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct"

real cp was legal in Japan until very recently. The US is kind of a bully about spreading its laws to other countries.

...

Stupid child molesters, you just attracted Dr. Seuss to this thread.

...

...

So she finally got the D from her teacher.

...

Funfact. the women who drew that was molested as a little girl.

...

...

I literally responded to the first response to that post and said I like lolis. It's just hilarious that people are trying to defend it with freedom of speech. People use freedom of speech for everything, it's a shield for so much shit. There's a lot of reasons I think loli porn is fine, like it being visually satisfying, and a healthy alternative for people with sexual desires for children, but freedom of speech? Cmon man

>Implying only Christians are disgusted by child pornography
Quite the opposite actually.

Pic related

damn, why do I like little girls so anons?

I don't understand in that way, the people who came here came with the intention of share this material send and receive. He could be held liable if in an inappropriate place he as the only holder of that kind of material distribute for a large number of people

>WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUT

(c)Nonrequired Element of Offense.—
It is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exist.

They changed and updated it to that about a year back.