If you could only choose between one of these two options:
1) Michael's entire life is erased from history. Both his music and molestation of children.
2) Michael's history remains intact, including his molestation of children.
Which would you choose? I.e. Did Michael's work make up for molesting children? Did he earn himself the right to a few kids?
Other urls found in this thread:
huffingtonpost.com
twitter.com
IT WAS THE 80S!
I would keep his history intact, solely because a LOT of good artists were inspired or partially inspired by MJ's music. I don't like his music at all, no, but a lot of the artists I like did. And without him, the musicians I like probably wouldn't be making music at all, or their music would at least be very different.
Plus, those sweet pedo/vitiligo/surgery jokes are too good to pass up.
>his molestation of children
You're treating this as a fact as if he was proven guilty. There was no proof.
The first kid who stated he was molested admitted it was a lie and his parents forced him to say it.
In fact MJ won the first trial but since their parents wanted to continue unless he'd pay millions, he just paid them because it was way too difficult for him. He even said later that he regretted paying them.
Who the fuck just accepts money and stop charges against the man who allegedly raped your child anyway ?
What happened next is quite obvious : Accusing MJ to have molested your child = big money, so they just kept coming, without any proof.
Look i like MJ a lot, but if he was proven guilty i'd totally accept it and wouldn't deny it. But he wasn't proven guilty. I don't know if he did, maybe he did, maybe he didn't, but stating he molested children as a FACT is wrong.
>including his molestation of children
That never happened
That boy raped kids i tell you hwat
Michael Jackson already revealed that the kikes that had raised him to stardom were trying to destroy him and dismantle all his wealth and assets
He did have tons of child porn on his computer which they recently discovered
That alone makes his case very weak.
Depends, are we talking magical realism where this happens somehow without any effort on the part of people, we wish for it and it comes true, or are we talking mass censorship? Because the type of censorship where you erase people from history is bad, and fascist.
>I don't like his music at all
Not even Billie Jean?
Billie Jean is alright but not particularly interesting to me.
magical wish
Not even Smooth Criminal? The full 10 minute music video?
So Billie Jean is not your love?
no he didn't
huffingtonpost.com
i know it's huffpost but the shit's there brah, michael's innocent
I mean, it's not like he molested ME....
you're next
Did he used the word "nigga" when he was white?
No, to both.
Wait, the dude from the Jackson 5 had a solo career? He probably shouldn't have quit the band. That's him on the left, right?
Not even Black or White?
>believing he was a child molester
Reminder that he gave us Billie Jean.
The world turned to shit after he died.
Your life went to shit after he died.
i don't give a fuck about these children, of course the music
What's so bad about molesting kids
I'd sacrifice truckloads of children to preserve MJ's badman career
Nah.
Not even Pretty Young Thing?
PYT is GOAT
How about something much more difficult:
You are given the choice of bringing one King back from the dead and in their prime: Elvis or Michael Jackson.
Who do you choose?
The one who actually composed his music.
Huh?