How cum sex with 13 year old babes is illegal when they want it as much as the older guy does?

How cum sex with 13 year old babes is illegal when they want it as much as the older guy does?

It's mutual attraction and shouldn't be frowned upon.

Because we live in a society where fucking anyone under the age of 18 is illegal. Kind of sucks, but that's just the way it goes. Have to obey the law or you get assfucked to death in prison. Resist the urge, that's all I can say.

Alright Robert we get it.

not in muslims countrys

you can take child brides and when she grows too old you can cut her head off

well this didn't happen in a Muslim country you dick wad.

yeah but sandnigger girls are gross

16 is legal age in Washington. A couple other states too.

It's 13 in Argentina and they have plenty of white qts

now switch the genders and nobody care
equality

No one asked for your mudslide opinion.

Not positive but I think its 13 in Japan too

Legal age of conscent In Japan is 13,

But we have some wits about ourselves because we're in a different kind of population crisis where we need out weomen to mature and realise maybe they shouldn't have sex with some guy whose 20 years older than she is

It's 12 in Mexico but they're ugly af

Why not just make a sovereign nation for a day and fuck some kids in your own home then re join the united states after you finish? Seems like the most logical way to get some tight ass.

Let's start a petition or some shit

or however you'd go into starting a sovereign nation

The same reason it's illegal to sell cigarettes to 13 year olds.

Because it gives them cancer?
Your point is fucking stupid.

Because they don't know what's good for them

Yes, because it may adversely affect them and they're not smart enough to make any decision for themselves.

It should honestly be as illegal & viewed as being as "disgusting" for kids & teens to have attractions to adults, or watch adult porn.
Do we want a just society or what?
Can't be one way for one side but not for the other.

>they're not smart enough to make any decision for themselves.

So, perfectly fine for them to fuck, long as it's a dumbass kid their own age who knows nothing about technique or protection.

But their parents do.
Ergo, their parents should be the only ones having sex with them.

Yes, because kids their own age are just as dumb and won't manipulate them. Safe sex should be taught to them in school.

This guy gets it

No, the parents could be the ones deciding who they should be having sex with is the conclusion.

>won't manipulate them

You are a fucking moron if you really believe this.

Well, they will manipulate each other the same for the most part, the point is that nobody has the upper hand.

So, the only way an adult would ever be able to have sex with a minor is of the minor was manipulated into it?
A minor would never choose to do it on their own, nor manipulate the adult?
What fucking kids have you known?

When I was growing up, every fucking girl I knew my own age was trying, and often succeeding to fuck adult men, of their own volition; and us guys were trying and often failing to do the same to adult women.

Femanon here. I used to have the hots for my 35 year old neighbor when I was 13.

So what if the parents decide they'd rather have their kid having sex with a responsible adult than an irresponsible kid?
Is it okay then?

Tits or gtfo

I didn't say every adult would manipulate them, but there is the risk, which is why you disallow it. You can't have the cops deciding how much the minor is being manipulated, it would be way too much effort.

Is this common?

If they are of sound mind and their intentions are good, why not.

How many kids have you fucking known?
Yes, very common. For both genders.

Yep. Ever since I was young I had the hots for older men. It wasn't until I got to high school when I started getting into guys my own age.

I thought anyone over 30 was gross when I was 13

>it would be way too much effort.

Yup, great reasoning for criminalizing & making pariahs out of a lot of people for a part of human nature.

Very common doesn't mean all or always.

The first statutory rape laws were implemented in France, in the 1700s. They were a subset of other labor laws, designed to reduce the rate of prostitution in children at the time. That's right, they were labor laws. Because after the scientific revolution, they were smart enough in France to know that a woman is biologically an adult when she goes through her first period.

Nobody knows why those laws are in still place, today. It's sort of a five-monkies situation. "Well, that's why the way it's always been around here." It's worth noting that in my state at least, the minumum age of consent is 16. But for real though, the age of consent should be "can this organism produce fertile offspring?" Because, y'know. Science.

Cool story bro

Very amusing to me when one can use both the "that's how it was back then" excuse to not sully the names of historical figures who married often VERY underage girls; yet also argue that the urge itself is evidence of a severe mental illness deserving chemical castration or execution in the modern day.

When really we're only talking about a difference of about a hundred years or so here in the states.

Making airplanes 100% safe is too much effort. Great reasoning for having all those people die in airplane crashes. This is the real world with limited resources.

Making airplanes 100% is not fucking possible with current technology, so this is a non-sequitor.

Yes it is, the only reason airplanes crash is because they're not thoroughly inspected before every take-off and human error, both of which can be corrected with enough resources.

What is weather?

But that's besides the point, the point is that more resources could save lives.

If she's old enough to get pregnant, she's old enough to have sex. Because you can't get pregnant, without sex.

It is an empirical fact that females of this species are the most fertile between ages 13-18. Ergo, if your plan is to make a baby, this is the ideal time to do so.

HOWEVER. It turns out that making babies is not a high priority right now. Actually, making babies is wrong, and bad, except when it happens and everyone pretends that's it's a miracle so they don't drive each other insane with the burden of responsibility that's suddenly thrust upon them. Thus, there's immense social pressure to dissuade fertile 13-18 year old women from having sex. And since lawmaking in the U.S. is pure shit, this takes the form of making it blackout illegal for anyone under any circumstances.

But uhoh! You can't prosecute teenage men for this crime, because they're not adults. So it turns out that teen chicks who know they want to have a child end up easily getting knocked up by teen boys who don't know what the hell they're doing. This, rather than simply legalizing arranged, intentional marriages with men who are actually financially stable and mature enough to handle an irrational, hormone driven, potently fertile female of our species.

Can be counted as human error, you're nitpicking around the point though, check your autism.

>check your autism
You're trying to conflate airline safety with the need for statutory rape laws, I'm not sure you should be calling anyone else out on their autism.

The analogy was apt, sometimes you sacrifice a few for convenience.

>convenience
Yes, the great plague of humanity. Why we're wrecking the planet & shitting in our own bed.

You do realize this is a rough equivalent to saying "it takes too much effort to figure out which nigger is gaming the welfare system, so let's just outlaw welfare", yes?

So...we just established that Islam is human error, right?

Except more people would die from doing that than the alternative, sometimes the math is easy.

Everything you've said in both comments was spot-on. I'm not sure if it's just moralistic or proto-SJW garbage that keeps these things around, or pure reactionary idiocy.

Still trying to crunch those numbers on how many cases of statutory rape involve mortality.

Here I'd thought it was just sex, and often relationships with little to no non-moralistic harm involved.

We established that a while back with religion in general, but we're largely a short-bus people.

Godamn, you sick bastards disgust me. Worst thing is how you are trying to justify it. Mutual liking, the fucking gurl is 13, she cant think past her fucking barbie doll and probably doesnt even know birds and bees.

If you want mutual liking for 13 year olds, youd also would have to want equal rights for 13 year old kids, which means let them vote, let them drive and generally accept them like they are adults. But you fucking spineless freaks only want that thing.
You remind me of my ex-wife in a bikini, cause you disgust me.

Nice b8 m8

> mfw 14 year old girlfriend has been a better lover than my slutty exes and she's great at sex too (pic related)
> mfw I'm 24 but shes so mature and prefers older guys anyway
> mfw friends and family don't mind because know I'm super nice and would never hurt her or do anything she doesn't want

>doesnt even know birds and bees
This is the fucking internet age; these kids are far more knowledgeable of sex, in detail, than any other generation, including all of our great ancestors, for whom this was just accepted as being normal & no big deal at all.
Or were they every bit as sick?

I absolutely GUARANTEE that some segment of 13 year olds want the D. I declined further contact last year when i found out her age a bit after being approached by her
>Be warned: the van is very, very real

To be fair the concept behind statutory rape is fucking stupid.

>Both ends consent willingly and knowingly

>Third party (typically a parent) screams "RAPE!" and thus bypasses the two party consent.

MOOOOOOOREEE

She's hot TBH I'd bang

You can't fucking change human nature in a little over a hundred years; if you can do it at all.

I personally am NOT talking about prepubescents; I'm talking about girls who've begun menstruation.

WE ARE FUCKING WIRED FOR THIS. We always HAVE been.

Holy shit dude are you in your 60's?

Even in the early 2000's girls within the 13-15 bracket were anything but this. Girls who fucking looked up to sluts like Paris Hilton as a fucking role model.

Now these days everyone 10 and above has access to a tablet or a cellphone. 13 year olds do not fucking play barbies anymore, they are on their iphones facebooking and hashtagging.

Seriously, update your knowledge base of the generation, its not the 80's/90's anymore.

>STUPID SPOILED WHORE
>Video Playset

This is actually a good discussion of the subject, for once; let's not fuck it up with a bunch of questionable pics & end up getting it pruned by a mod looking for an excuse.

I'm a Muslim now.

population control

Come to germany and fuck 14 year olds , it's legal

Based Germany, as usual.
Except for that cunt in office.

>lose virginity to 13 y/o gf at 16
>she owns lingerie, smokes pot, listens to grunge, takes birth control, buys me condoms
>having no experience my instinct is to take it slow, but she is relentless
>regularly calls me over and comes to the door wearing nothing but a t-shirt, gets very touchy
>after about a month she basically forces herself on me while we're making out
>always suggesting new positions and ways to have sex, sometimes pretty kinky
13 year olds are not children. I personally was 100% ready for sex at 13, but I was basically afraid of upsetting the girl I was dating at the time by suggesting it. Looking back, she was obviously ready too. By that age I was independent of my parents in terms of decision making, and pretty much only dependent on them financially. Both I and the girl described above were ahead of the curve, but if you are mature enough to operate a machine that can kill innocent bystanders if used improperly you are mature enough to pick who you fuck. IMO the age of consent should be 15 or 16.

You still dont get my initial point and you just proved what I was trying to say, which is that you only want that thing. You only want kids to be able to agree for mutual relationships, for everything else you dont give a shit about. It just doesnt add up.

>implying the jealous UN wouldnt invade with peacekeepers and execute you for "crimes" against humanity

Did the same thing except th girl was 14 and I was 23. It was illegal as fuck but the sex was hot as hell and I genuinely loved spending time with her too.

We still talk to this day. She's clean, non-slutty and about to get her bachelors.

>It just doesnt add up.
So our ancestors, like from a hundred years ago & before, who did this all the time & for whom it was entirely normal, were as sick as you claim people now are for it?

It's 2016. It's time man. It's time.

Time for what?

No, YOU live in one. 16 is fine here.

VVV THIS

You're an idiot.

For 2016-like behaviour. We aren't cavemen anymore.

Mods

For what? Fucking discussion?
You're a moron.

WTF is 2016 like behavior?

We kill motherfucking civilians with drones from the other side of the world, get the fuck out of here with this 2016 like behavior bullshit.

My bitch killed her toddler girl so we could bone with abandon. Dickhead DA did a complete fail.

Moral of the story: pussy is fun.

That's why we need feminism to advance our culture. You can't expect men to actually stop making wars, that's why its feminisms job to make everyone equal so we don't blow eachother up anymore. Also we need to end the wage gap and really work hard asvancing womens rights and thise of minorities.

This my friend, would be a 2016 utopia. One day, who knows, we might even achieve it.

Its 17 in texas

dude, they're muslims, calm down

Trump complains about the meskin judge who is persecuting him and is called a racist.

Bunch of cunts who complain about the judge who sentenced Brock Turner are called heroes.

Fucking jackoffs.

Fuck feminism. And all the other isms.

Niiiice.

You want to move on?
Great let's move on.
Let's move on from religion. Let's move on from slaughtering animals for their meat, when it simply isn't necessary for our sustenance anymore. Let's move on from slaughtering each other over nations, or religions.
These are all cavemen-like ideals.

Or is it only the sex & relationships with minors that are cavemen ideals you want to drop?

Still haven't heard a logical reason as to why.

I think it's 13 or 14 in Estonia. It's one of the rare countries still not too tainted with black and mudslime seed. Full of pure white people.

>Let's move on from slaughtering animals for their meat

da fuck?

The point
>
>
>
>
Your head

No one is moving on from shit you retard.

Where might one obtain such a delusional world view? SF Bay Area?

Fucking retards.

All right, settle down. We're all cavemen realists, yes?

After pushing globalism for decades, the US is due a bit of nationalism, which Trump will deliver.