Fact: If the victims had carried guns, they could have defended themselves against the attacker

Fact: If the victims had carried guns, they could have defended themselves against the attacker.

Prove me wrong.
Protip: you can't

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/Epeo8Pfm1xM
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

OP here. Seems like you really can't prove me wrong.

If you stop being a faggot, you will not be a target.

Where is a guy like this going to fit a gun?

What if I told you... it doesn't matter if you're gay or straight. They kill everyone.

his asshole

Truth is, even though you claim that terrorists would gain weapons anything, in countries with strict gun laws there just aren't these shootings. Your logic here is hurtful no matter how hard you're trying to bait because if we give everybody easy access to the weapons. There are hundreds of thousands of psychos who can access weapons when they otherwise wouldn't

u cant dance right if ur strapped

in his booty shorts duh cunt

Yeah, it was a gay bar but nohomo.
Kill yourself so they can't kill you.

take away the guns they used it would just be replaced with bombs anyway

kek

FACT: Meth is used much more in gay communities than by a normal user.

No protip, just a fact.

lies

im from a town taht is like 50% meth heads, they all gay hating trailer trash

So? The more people have weapons, the more they can defend themselves. A psycho with a gun would be an easy target. It's that easy. It balances out.

Well here in San Francisco it's a running joke. Anytime a meth addict comes to a rehab center, people assume he's gay .. or if a gay guy comes, they assume he used meth.

Almost always spot on.

thats new york, you fuck. not orlando.

With all those limp wrists I doubt they could wield a gun.

Yeah, because the Islamic State ONLY targets faggots

Yea. As happened in France. Only faggots.

Shooter had element of surprise user, even if the people did have guns, they never would've had a chance to use them

How do you know?

>posts bait thread
>gets ignored up til this point
>declares victory because he was ignored

delusional much?

if it were that simple it would have been implemented especially with all the support political figures and governments are willing to give. so nstead of applying backwards "balancing" logic, why don't you look at the countries that don't have these massacres *cough cough* strict gun policed places * cough cough*

THE ANSWER IS NOT MORE GUNS!

>unless it is.

Ooh mommy i dindu nuffin

Nope. Most governments fear the armed population. That's the reason for strict gun laws in most countries.

For god sakes you liberal socialist marxist jackass, get a cough drop and shut the fuck up.

the muslims are a separate problem altogether, don't give up on one problem because another ensues. trump will get rid of Islamic culture in the US

gay bars are full of guns, friend

we're talking about the US specifically, there is where there are bloody organisations that push for gun rights and people flood money into keeping guns legal

because france has such lax gun laws rite.

See normally I'd agree with OP, but in this situation a few people carrying pistols wouldn't have done jackshit.


That being said, pro-gunners and anti-gunners are gonna use a tragedy like this to push their respective agendas. I'm pro-gun myself, but that's just disgusting.

no guns = no shootings

If the shooter didn't have access to a gun, this would've never happened.

Prove me wrong.
>protip: you can't

i'm not claiming to be any of those things, but i will go as far as to say you have nothing more to add when you start insulting, even if this is Sup Forums you're clearly stumped

Absolutely true. In all mass shootings, if the victims had guns, they almost invariably would have been able to defend themselves against the attacker, and significantly decrease the number of deaths.

Of course, if everybody is carrying guns, the likelihood they'll use them skyrockets and instead of an occasional mass-shooting, we'll have thousands of one, two, or three victim shootings on a daily basis.

Basically, your solution is shit, because it produces its own new set of problems.

Our current government is composed of pussies that cannot even NAME the problem. We sit around and wait among the seething boiling pot of islamists, waiting for the next attack and martyrdom. We think that catching them and killing them is deterrent!

The goal is for them to be killed in the name of Islam. No one wants to admit this fact. Catching them and killing them is the end goal for muslims. They weep in joy for this to happen.

France's terrorist attacks were the result of the muslims, not gun laws

youtu.be/Epeo8Pfm1xM

>pro-gun Americans actually believe this

vote trump, he'll deal with it

...

another fantastic example of bad logic that seems ever more prevalent in the us

Gays are generally hardcore libtards that like to pretend that muslims dont want to kill them at all and its all just rightwing propaganda.

>a few people carrying pistols wouldn't have done jackshit.

You're acting like you know things you cannot possibly know. It's impossible to know that a few armed and well trained citizens could not have stopped the killer.

What we have is over 50 dead, with no one armed.

You're claiming that the best situation was waiting on the police to mop up the gushy stuff that used to be humans.

They are what they eat

>implying the simplest solution is wrong

The fact that the loud far left cannot even name the problem is giving the right wing nuts enormous energy that we don't want them to have.

Do you see how this is working? The left is making cuckolds of itself.

I'm as liberal as I can be, and I can see that on the issue of Islam the conservatives get this question right, reliably.

They would had no problem if they were not a bunch of cocksucking faggots.

Even in northern Europe you can buy machine guns from illegal dealers.

fucking this
Of course there would be less deaths in a mass shooting if more would carry guns.
However, look at how many people die in the US outside of those mass shootings. Look at how many die in gun accidents. Then multiply those numbers and tell me again the solution is more gun owners.

50 dead in one shooting is horrifying, but way more people are dying of guns in accidents. Strict gun laws prevent this. At least do some decent background checks and mandatory reevaluation.

If the victims were allowed to have guns in a club they wouldn't have been targeted.

99% of criminals use illegal guns, if ALL guns were illegal criminals would STILL use illegal guns

So to a important question. Where is the gore?

It worked in France and Belgium! This user is right!

If it is illegal to get guns, then the terrorists will obey the laws! This is excellent logic!

Sup Forums is full of smart people this morning.

The left is FAR more concerned with hurting the feelings of the muslims, than the actual lives lost by muslims.

"Racism is worse than Jihad"

We should outlaw murder and drugs next!

It's not about terrorist attacks only. ofc some people will get ahold of guns. Why don't you look a the total number of gun deaths and shootings and tell me again what does not work in France and Belgium.
But if you can't get rid of 100% it's not worth doing, is that what you're saying, smarty?

When I was single my duck had the shingles

Ok, let's do a mind experiment.

Say, you are outside going for a walk on a sunny day. Suddenly, you see a muslim pointing a gun at a beautiful girl.

Scenario 1:
You take your gun, aim at the guy and if neccessary shoot him.

Scenario 2:
You don't have a gun and you are a pussy. You call the cops and run for cover because you fear to lose your shitty life.

Now the important question:
Who, you think, will the beautiful woman be more thankful towards?

Islam is a seperate problem. This guy had fucking bombs too, even if he wasnt able to get a gun.
Islam is a terrible cancer, and you have only 1% muslims in america. Come back when you have 6% like in my country and tell me if you still think they are just regular civilized people like you and me

Underrated post

>ITT: Conservatards circlejerk and establish false consensus

Shit America is doomed, the ultra rich just have us stuck arguing over stupid shit like this while they steal our freedoms and government.

The girl is probably a feminazi shittard and will blame white men for pushing the muslim over the edge

I think all gay people should be given guns and all non gays should suck some dick in a government building to be eligible to keep theirs. This would solve all problems.
Niggas be like "yo bitch I'm strapped "
His homies "Nigga you gay"
Muzzies wouldn't touch them for fear from each other, rednecks same. And gays dont get picked on anymore.

Feminist lesbians do not get guns however. That would be bad for everyone.

top kek

lel

Why don't you stop being naive, an outright ban isn't that easy/simple.

Going to the club like

Better idea would be, give all muricans free guns. Let the hunting games begin.

...

I'm a Muslim. Pesophilia is no worse than homosexuality. It's just different cultural norms.

Sleep tight clubber

Why don't you take a seat over there?

But do you have any idea how hard it is to get your hands on a gun in a country with no guns? It's hard, take it from a deranged Canadian.

Fact: If the shooter never had a gun in the first place, this would'nt have happened.

>totally not projecting any closeted homosexuality.

Checked

Why do gays need to have parades? They've got equal rights and same sex marriage now so why do we have to see them semi naked flaunting their gay shit about the place like complete faggots?

lol its like you dont read the news

you generally don't bring a gun to a night club be it straight or gay, that fail was on security and mngmt.

Moonman did nothing wrong

Fucking Mexican currency and men's assholes, the same exact thing. You heard it here first, folks.

If everyone had guns there would statistically be more shootings?! Other countries have banned guns and their suicide and homicide rates have gone done. Numbers don't lie.

Just like france, eh?

that's the general consensus outside of America but dem gun lovers can't admit it. Gotta have me guns y'all to defend my home 'n' basement. When you can't carry, the fail system will fail, just live with it and stop whinging everytime there is a wipeout

Then your country either doesn't have a well established black market or you just haven't gone looking for things on the dark side of town that much.
Here just the demand from gang wars and freelance drug dealers fighting each other (how do we still have drugs?) over the drugs keeps everything flowing.
Again an underlying problem of people killing each other trying to disarm all the law abiding citizens isn't going to help.
Worse these take away people's-defense-groups aren't going to ever answer for the tens of thousands of people every year who end up raped, maimed and killed because they couldn't defend themselves.
The same people who are all for female and minority power want to take away the only way people have of equalizing force.
Even without the guns there are plenty of other ways of killing large amounts of people. And much stricter gun laws than we have haven't prevented attacks like Paris.
Lack of attacks isn't gun control working, it's just lack of attacks.
Just like declining murder rates in a place like Australia have little to nothing to do with the extreme gun control they enacted.
It was already low to begin with and decreasing before the legislation.

Fags carrying guns in a nightclub? How about no scot

>ofen window to let in the breeze
>see fair maiden in distress
>fire 3 Sig Sauer P229 9mm rounds into gunman
>save the day
>it was my privilege
>sued
>jail
>publicly humiliated
mfw

Yes in Florida and probably every other state you aren't allowed to carry a gun into a bar or the bar section of a place that isn't just a bar.

This shooter damn well knew this too, he worked security for a living.
Just like the Colorado shooter knew which movie theater had a no guns policy. (which you don't have to abide by as law in every state)

>hundreds of thousands of psychos
[citation needed]

Chris Rock had the best idea, make bullets cost $5000 each. This guy might've been able to kill 1, maybe.

>Implying the orlando attack in America wasnt also caused by Muslims.
You just contradicted yourself user. Good job.

He was a security guard. He would have had access to handguns anyway.

gays are already struggling with mental illnesses. How do you know they won't cause a mass shooting somewhere else? Imagine giving guns to bunch of mentally challenged people. That's actually how ISIS was formed.

Fact: if none of you american faggots had easy access to guns, shit like this wouldn't happen

I mean christ how many mass shootings does like, canada have again?

You wouldn't need a gun to defend yourself if no one else had guns to threaten you with lmao

Only give guns to intelligent Americans, i.e. none.