How do Turks justify living on stolen land...

How do Turks justify living on stolen land? Do they have something similar to how American whites have "Manifest Destiny"?

Literally everyone except scandinavians are living on stolen land

>except Scandinavians
What about the Samis huhh

Americans bought their land fair and square.

Not really. Most Europeans are indigenous to their land and are descended from the peolpe who have continuously been living on the land for 10,000+ years.

...

Pfff. You mean the first few acres of the original 13 colonies. All the rest after was expanded upon and stolen. Also, justifying that the "technically bought" it doesn't count when one party doesn't understand the terms and is being threatened at the same time.

Because no one is willing to back greece.

Except Scandinavia was an inhabitable frozen wasteland 10,000+ years ago

You realize that Turkey doesnt consist of a singular ethnicity and the people are largely the same?
And what about the Laz? If anything they are more entitled to the north east than armenians.

Also
>Kurds
>Having land stolen
That would imply they ever owned it to begin with.

>Kurdistan
BIGGEST MEME EVER

>Laz
I want to cry. Finally a foreigner knows about us.

There was a thread about how comfy you are a few days ago.
Tea, guns and lush mountains.

Thats not a foreigner thats a dönerci :DD

Samis are only native to the northern inland of Scandinavia where no one lives.

Surely the Kurds must have at some point owned some land somewhere. Everyone comes from somewhere.

>that much Kurdistan

Mesopotamia. They entered Anatolia with Seljuk army

Where do Kurds come from then?

Central Anatolia would be absolute fuckin trash tier if it wasnt for Circassians.

desu kurds are just a mix of turks, arabs and persians, they didnt defined themselves as kurds until turkish independance

...

>they didnt defined themselves as kurds until turkish independance

Thats wrong though. Just fuckin stop. You know fuck all about this region.

They have something called "being nomadic savages"

Bizim Danimarkalı dönerci o xex

They came from somewhere but they didn't necessarily own land. Like Turks they were semi-nomadic for a long time.

Right of conquest.

I know what im saying, do some researchs about kurdish identity and you'll see

West cares about kurds only because they are the contemporary turks about the secular values but in fact they have the samew ay of thinking then arabs and persians, the first iraqi jihadi group was kurd.

turks are the 2nd biggest minority in Denmark, so it's probably a turk (they are typically nationalist too so big chance of knowing history).


tl;dr it was a turk who wrote that

kurds entered anatolia together with the turks after the battle of manzikert and they settled further in there after the armenian genocide since kurds where used by the turks to eleminate them

This is basically the same as manifest destiny

They're descendants of the Medes.

...

The right of conquest obviously. That was the driving force of almost all human settlement throughout most history, I don't see why we should be singled out.

>A Euro lectures America on stealing land