SWEDEN IS THE BEST AND HAS THE MOST SUCCESSFUL HISTORY

>1. Sweden has never been conquered nor occupied by a foreign force in its history.

>2. Sweden despite having a tiny population decided the balance of power and religous make up of europe in the thirty years war
3. Gustavus Adolphus of Sweden or "the father of modern warfare" revolutionized warfare to the nature it is today

>4. Sweden in the 1600s, a sparesly populated nordic nation declared war on the Holy Roman Empire, Europes strongest state, and won almost every battle fought while occupying half its territory

>5. In the early 1700s Swedens King Karl XII (Carolus rex) occupied half of europe, and launched a decisive invasion of Russia, winning all battles against them except one. Like all who tried however this invasion ultimately failed due to the Russian winter and scorched earth tactics.

>6. Karl XII did however invade poland-lithuania, saxony, denmark-norwary and not loose a single battle. At this time sweden was the most militarised state in the world with a modern conscription system and the most modernized army

>7. almost a hundred years later sweden won the largest naval battle in the baltic, destroying a third of russias fleet in one battle (battle of Svensksund)

>8. In recent times sweden has been a leader in arms export, making highly advanced tanks, ships, submarines and fighter jets to name a few

>9. Going back to swedens early history, the Vikings where some of histories greatest warriors

Prove me wrong. protip: you can't

>Sweden has never been conquered nor occupied by a foreign force in its history.
what about.... right now?

how is being a warmongering muslim shithole success again?

And look at it now. Pretty irrelevant. I prefer countries like Poland who start out as shit but become good.

...

They haven't let in the Americans yet.

>who start out as shit but become good.
what

...

This is not a conquest since there is no fight

If there was a war the Swedes would easily genocide your shitlsim brothers.

You are better than Greece and Spain get over it.

Don't worry Poland, we will hopefully be ready when the time comes.

Sweden is an overrated European country which has never had its golden age.

Every country, from the UK, to France, to Italy, to Greece, to Spain, to Portugal, to the Netherlands, have all had their respective golden ages when they contributed to the progression of the world.

So what if those viking pillagers and rapists won a couple battles here and there. They weren't "the greatest warriors", they were baser militants who raided villages and killed and abused villains. Those chickenshits abstained from making their mark in the World Wars, when they had an opportunity to stand for something but decided they didn't want the conflict. They never had great aesthetic achievements or literary achievements.

Its empire never achieved a state where the sun never set (UK). It never birthed capitalism, the first stock market, the largest corporation ever, and a dominance of the seas (Netherlands). They never spread their influence, religion, architecture, and people across the Western world (Spain).

Scandis are the most overrated people on the planet.

>it never birthed capitalism
>what is 1900 and onwards in Sweden

>werent greatest warriors
>what is Swedish history
>what is Swedish special forces today

>never spread their influence

Alright this is bait.

I wish we had something like fennoswedes or chicanos desu

...

>what is 1900s and onwards sweden
Yes, what is it? The big capitalists were anglo, germanic, and Jewish. Name one relevant Swede

>muh little battles here and there
By that logic, you're only a shitty version of the Mongols

>name one relevant Swede

What are you even on about you retarded fucking leaf

Except the mongols raped everything in their way and vanished.

We have never been conquered, we've done plenty of conquering though.

No. Enjoy your new Stasi laws making Germany full of cameras now

This, well said

Now watch Swedes cry as they try to refute you (which they can't)

too l8 m8

Turn off the proxy Sven

>THE MOST SUCCESSFUL HISTORY

WE

>muh stormaktstid

Thats all you got and it was only beacuse of French money and Finnish soldiers

>it was only due to hurr durr

>9. Going back to swedens early history, the Vikings where some of histories greatest warriors

And I almost started to take you seriously.

The Swedish empire had nothing to do with native swedes, it relied on a few Swedish kings being funded by the French using German mercenaries and Finnish conscripts.

You have the Arabic version too, right?

HEY PEWDIEPIE LETS BROFIST

>The Swedish empire had nothing to do with native swedes
then why did it occur in Sweden?
>it relied on a few Swedish kings
6 to be precise
>being funded by the French
France was also funded by Sweden, whats your point
>using German mercenaries
the majority of hired mercenaries were Scottish
>and Finnish conscripts.
The Swedish army had 13 regiments, only four was finnish. The wast majority of fighting was done by sweeds

>Sweden millitary
Yeah right they got cucked so much by shock cavalry that they reintroduced the concept to Western Europe when everyone was using gay pistol shooting circle running cavalry.

>never invaded
>just decides to hand over the land

That's a whole new level of cuckness.

>Going back to swedens early history, the Vikings where some of histories greatest warriors
This is bait

>never invaded
Sweden has been invaded a lot.

As a Finn my greatest fear in the world is a new Stormakstiden.
Us Finns would be powerless to resist them if the Swedes woke up from their centuries of slumber.

>So what if those viking pillagers and rapists won a couple battles here and there. They weren't "the greatest warriors", they were baser militants who raided villages and killed and abused villains.

you're confusing us with Danes m8

>Those chickenshits abstained from making their mark in the World Wars, when they had an opportunity to stand for something but decided they didn't want the conflict.

dont spout that horseshit. both world wars was fought for retarded ideological concepts. why fight when there is nothing to gain?

>both world wars was fought for retarded ideological concepts.

Helping to fight the nazis is "retarded"? Kys

Just leave my country already, slavshit.

>nazi sympathizer
You just lost all the credibility you had. The fact that you defend those shits after invading our brother Norway and all else they did is simply laughable. Go back to slurping mt. dew now.

>be friend of Russia
>accuse others of having no credibility

Fighting the nazis doesn't make you a friend of the Soviets. Which became obvious after the war when USA+Britain and the Soviets went "wait I actually hate you"

Sorry, but siding with the Russians is just as bad as siding with the nazis. The moral high ground goes to anyone who chose to fight both or neither.

It is, but since the nazis were the aggressors and the ones who decided to fuck shit up, it would have been more just to fight against them

Could have fought off the nazis first and then the soviets, but by that time the soviets had already comitted tons of crimes such as holodomor etc.

>the nazis were the aggressors
The German invasion of the Soviet Union was a legitimate case of self defence. Stalin was never going to leave Germany alone and Hitler knew it. Operation Barbarossa was Germany sucker punching the Soviet Union while the Soviet Union was winding up for a haymaker. Don't think the Russians would have stopped with Germany either. If Stalin had come in with the momentum he planned for, he would not have stopped until he reached the Atlantic.

>it would have been more just to fight against them
Throwing Swedish lives into the meat grinder for the sake of Russia would have been neither sane nor just.