ITT: we defend our right to bear arms

ITT: we defend our right to bear arms

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=LPQ1Sp0huLk
youtube.com/watch?v=IakgpoX7MIY
youtube.com/watch?v=egsaVu2wgXM
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

You already said it, it is our right. Enough said.

checkd

I'm a latent homosexual with a microphallus and owning a high powered rifle gives me a false sense of masculinity when I'm browsing trap breads on 4 Chan. Don't take muh freedoms!!!

Cool

Yeah, brilliant. Let's encourage all American Muslims to arm themselves in case Trump wins.

...

>AR15
>high powered

Pick one

...

Shall not be infringed. See? That wasn't so hard

nice fake image
do you think its real?

Excellent point, sir

I think I found that one reporter...

"I’ve shot pistols before, but never something like an AR-15. Squeeze lightly on the trigger and the resulting explosion of firepower is humbling and deafening (even with ear protection).

The recoil bruised my shoulder, which can happen if you don't know what you're doing. The brass shell casings disoriented me as they flew past my face. The smell of sulfur and destruction made me sick. The explosions — loud like a bomb — gave me a temporary form of PTSD. For at least an hour after firing the gun just a few times, I was anxious and irritable."

I'm part if an effort to arm immigrants whom are willing and able.

also training and post military hanging out.

Sweet dreams whitey.

main pic

notice

two real images composed together does not equal one fake photo

>probably common core logic

I chuckle every time I read this. To think a grown man actually felt that way after shooting an AR is the ultimate proof he is a cuck who also sucks dick. ARs are not a high powered rifle. They aren't even a large caliber.

...

...

Lightly keked

>>Bear Arms

...

muh freedom

that's a bear with a mans torso

...

Pic related... This is how it would go down in my backwoods redneck filled area... And I'm okay with that...

as long as it is a right to bear a gun that takes ten seconds to reload and is accurate to less than thirty yards, that is ok with me. Anything more is a breach of the Founders vision and needs heavily controlled.

>nods

...

...

Schizophrenic paranoid much?

>sulfur
nope never happend.
sulfur is not used in todays smokes powder, which is used in amunituion for said weapon.
not even sulfur compounds. the smell just won't happen.

lefty cuck

my nuts are noce an tingly, not numb at all. I know the difference between those rifles - I have fired both (and real military rifles as well - ex service man here - Iraq was not a nice place, you know?) And I think they should not be in the hands of civillians. Sign up and serve - in a well regulated militia - if you want a killing machine like that - but not in a residential house. I am not going to hang around and argue here - but if you think that thousands of deaths a year, millions of people suffering the misery of having loved ones murdered, is worth your right to have a cock extension, you are plain wrong. Morally wrong.

get the sand out of your vag and wake up

...

>its fine! our guns are so low powered! ARs aren't dangerous
>we need them to fight the US army if our government turns on us

Top fucking kek good logic

i am open to this

>ex service man
Holy shit, if you're gonna lie like an autist faggot, at least say the term correct. Go kill yourself

...

even if i don't exercize that right, i want it.

>mfw a tank knocks on your door and confiscates your rifle
At some point (unless a gov't is going to level its cities), you'll be dealing with another man.

>The Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea bans all firearms
>No terrorist attacks
>your turn gunfags

Ave cubum necis

Yes because all AR 15s come full auto with a forward grip from the factory.

I own a AR15 and a mini 14. Both use a 223 round. The difference is one has a wood stock and the other is plastic. Other than that they are the same.

>Silly colonist, you'll never overthrow the British Empire and all the resources at its disposal.

This is treason.

Dude its manzanar

...

the modern usage for the second amendment in the USA is retarded. gun control works well in Israel, Australia and the UK. and bitching about needing guns to stop tyrannical governments is retarded, if a band of americans trying to rebel against the government today, it would look like the waco siege. just look at the US civil war, half the country tried to stop what they thought was an oppresive government and were shut down.

...

the US army has tanks. your pea shooter can't do shit against a tank.

Leave the US if you don't support the Constitution. Go to a gun safe haven like Mexico.

youtube.com/watch?v=LPQ1Sp0huLk

>civies can own tha ma duece
>civies can own almost any ammo they want, including api
>ma duece makes swiss cheese of tanks
>tfw the shit falls out of your mouth

pic very related, it's you

top kik

As many people are killed by drunk rivers in this country as by ALL guns. Should we ban cars or that that just be too inconvenient? Maybe we should ban alcohol. Our wait last time we tried that it didn't work

I'll join you.

cant resist

>tfw girl shooting ma duce full auto

it can also prevent mainland invasion:
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass." to put it into perspective

>Heavily controlled
It is, in other countries. Please find one and go.

forgot link

>youtube.com/watch?v=IakgpoX7MIY

But you're legally allowed to own tanks....

go on about how amerifags have nothing but pea shooters, please

youtube.com/watch?v=egsaVu2wgXM

I assume the woman on the left is the attacker

no it's the libtards that think "she was asking for it"

Listen here you statist fucking retard, I understand you're completely illiterate when it comes with either firearms knowledge and or any true comprehension of morality and man's natural rights so let me spell this out for you real quick.
AR-15s should be legal, motherfucking aircraft carriers should be legal. You are a statist beta-cuck who can't comprehend that one day the people are going to eventually revolt and start the nation anew. Do you want the government to be the only ones with guns when that day comes? How about now? Police officers killed 3 people a day last year, a hell of a lot more than AR15s killed, maybe we should ban public policing or weapons from police. I don't want to even begin going into personal uses for AR15s but basically they're the best home defense weapon platform and if you think otherwise then you're wrong. No man is less equal than other men so there should be no ruling elite authority and if there is then we must do all we can to keep them from achieving a monopoly of violence.
You're living in a reality where within 50 years all that will remain will be low wage service jobs. Do you really want the government to be the only ones with easy access to AR15s at that point?
I guess it won't matter. The rule enforcers make the rules that we have to follow so with or without your support they will eventually outlaw most semi-auto rifles again.

Also, you can't just declare moral victory and run away but if you're going to then you definitely shouldn't be a retard who doesn't have a single factual argument.

Like you give a fuck about people dying. Just stop.

>implying that gun can do anything against a tank
>implying that wouldn't be shot to shit withing ten seconds of it opening fire
you can't buy automatic weaponry, but a tank is fine
a group of idiots with guns will do nothing against a trained and organized military, if the invading force can beat the US defence force, they can beat your hillbilly ass.

Founding fathers couldn't foresee the internet and your capability to reach millions of people instantaneously with your stupid point of view. should we curtail your right to free speech?

lol. someone who believes in "natural rights"

orly

Where do you live? So I can come take what I want.

Actually, a tank is a giant steel coffin versus one Infantryman at close range... Sure ain't gonna poke a hole in the armor with a common firearm, but there are a plethora of ways to disable/destroy a tank; they're actually quite fragile in many ways...

Gun control works great in the UK. Who was that MP that got shot last week?

car manufacturers try to make cars safe. so they don't kill people. so they don't kill pedestrians, or other road users, or the drivers and passengers. Gun makers don't tdo that. Also, it would not just be inconvenient if we banned cars - millions would die. Millions would die in a short time. Because we would not have food, medical supplies, transport to get to jobs, the country would come to a full stop. Would that happen if we banned guns? No. So your analogy is FUCKING STUPID. It is so bad that you posting it has made the world a stupider place.

People living in the most natural states all observe those rights and only civilizations with oppressive governments, like the one you're stuck living in, have trampled on those rights. You are nothing but a wage-slave and a tax payer to them, if you want to choose to quietly let them take away your rights because you're too cynical to understand them then that's your choice.
I think we'd all appreciate the hand though.

>mindless circular argument
And God exists because the bible says so

SURE you can trust the government!! Just ask a Native American!!

>Pictured: A massacre perpetrated by the United States goverment shortly after disarming the bulk of those killed....

I'm pretty sure if you get run over by a car from 1960 and a car from this year you're still going to die how does that make cars safer for the general public may be the person behind the wheel will live so they can drive over another person later

In sure the army would deploy one to my house you fucking idiot.

Tanks were made to battle other tanks, and moving battle ground forward. But you wouldn't know that, fucking Starbucks hipster. You want to run your mouth about how the US should operate, but you've never served a day for your country.

why should I leave my own country just so you can have a little fun with a deadly machine made for murdering people? You want to shoot, get a bb gun. you want to make a big noise - join the re-enactment brigade. You want to serve your country in a well regulated militia - join the army. You want to feel big and powerful and maybe murder someone in rage someday - fuck off.

Jo Cucks. A traitor to her people.

Very few of these people had gun control anywhere near as strict as west Europe
Like for christs sake Mao literally came to power by arming peasants, you fuckers are completely retarded

we're assuming that the tank in question is part of an actual military, and has infantry support
vs a modern, well equipped tank? that thing won't last long at all, the israelis made a thing that ensures that your shells don't even make it to the tank.
1 isolated case.
brisbane australia, come get me
I thought that the point of the 2nd amendment is that you don't need to rely on the government for protection.

Also highly trained and specialized police and medical personnel would have cars. Just not the general public you can still walk anywhere you need to go it's just going to be inconvenient

>be me
>fat stinky americunt
>still cling to a document by some inbred coal burner and his crew in the 1700's
>but muh guns!
>owns 62000 high powered AR -15 variant assault rifles, pistols and smg's of all kinds
>can buy an AK-47 in Walmart cheaper than you could buy a weeks worth of "real food"
>country b&'s kindereggs
>Mfw everyone in Uhmurka wonders why everyone's all fat and crazy and shooting each other

not sure if bait or not, but here we go

>implying that wouldn't be shot to shit withing ten seconds of it opening fire

god youre fucking clueless

oh you have a factual argument? that in 50 years there will only be low wage service jobs? That a fact? no management, no self employed, no middle class, no high wage jobs at all? How are they going to do that? Why would they do that? you have great fantasy life there.

That's because it's a dictatorship of the proletariat and not of the bourgeoisie
"Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary."
Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, Address of the Central Committee to the Communist League, London, March 1850

>you can't buy automatic weaponry
totally missed this too, wow you're retarded

like you give a fuck about people committing suicide, murder suicide, domestic murder, road rage killings, accidental shootings, children killing themselves or each other of their parents, ... just stop.

>I'm pretty sure if you get run over by a car from 1960 and a car from this year you're still going to die how does that make cars safer for the general public may be the person behind the wheel will live so they can drive over another person later

It doesn't matter about the car, all that matters is if an Asian woman is driving or a nigger of any gender.

lke you could give a shit about women protecting themselves

quit your war on women

no, because founding fathers could see the value of a marketplace of ideas. But they could not see the value of mass murder weapons in built up areas.

tanks also have machine guns was what I meant

someone has been paying close attention to the AR-15 media guide

So the human is responsible for safety? You don't say? I hope my vehicle doesn't go out and kill somebody. I already had a talk with my guns, they understand right from wrong.

Nice meme picture, got a fucking source for those anecdotes?

read Bentham. (philosopher who definitively dismissed the idea of natural rights over two hundred years ago) It isn't hard to find or to read - just google "nonsense on stilts" then come back to me.

>tfw civs don't understand how tanks and infantry work together.