What was his fookin problem?

What was his fookin problem?

Other urls found in this thread:

harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Mudblood
harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Muggle-born
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

He was an abomination born of incest

Hi Stannis!

Unsupervised genius level psychopath left unsupervised in an archive of dark arts.

What the fuck did you expected him to turn out like? Making magic singing ice cream? That he could've sell as Icescream? No. No he was bound to kill of fuck ton of shit and become an abomination.

he wanted to learn how to make horcruxes to get some tang but Dumbledouche kept cockblocking him

Mudbloods he was very clear about that.

He LITERALLY did nothing wrong. If it became normalized that magic people mated with Muggles regularly, then eventually there would be no more magic people. He did what he did because he was a hero.

why they say he's the strongest? he's not the one who found out about horcruxes, someone else must have done it before since it was already in the books.

...

back to Sup Forums

Except that's wrong.

he got molested by Dumblfag and that left him mentally scarred, this is canon btw

Give me the exert of this.

Rowling's working on it right now

...

>If it became normalized that magic people mated with Muggles regularly, then eventually there would be no more magic people

Wizards can come out of non-wizard couplings. Remember that that's what a "mudblood" is after all. The only thing this would cause is fewer purebloods.

Compensating for a small dick probably desu

what the fuck happened to the resurrection stone at the end and whats stopping someone from finding the pieces of the elder want and repairing it?

He was literally wizard Hitler so Sup Forums aka Sup Forumsvision will tell you he did nothing wrong

what exactly did he and Hitler do wrong?

Is this a joke? Golden ratio is a fucking myth.

thank you for proving my point you predictable cunt

He is very powerful and evil so he really doesn't give a fuck about any of the constraints that ordinary wizards put on themselves. That is why he is so feared.

I don't recall them ever saying he was the strongest. He is very powerful but I am pretty sure Dumbledore is equal if not stronger than him.

Autism

>Harry discarded the Stone, with the intention that it would be lost in the forest forever. The stone was pressed into the ground by a centaur's hoof while the herd was charging into battle.

He posted too many dank memes so we had to take him down.

It was implied there was a distant magic relative for every muggle born magic user, or that the muggle mother was raped by a wizard and they didn't even know the baby wasn't the muggle fathers.

he was a fucking half blood and was the strongest wizard ever

the whole argument made no fucking sense

Resurrection stone and the ring it was in are in the forest somewhere.

In the book Harry doesn't even destroy the wand, just puts it back with Dumbledore's corpse and goes on to try and live a regular life and dies without having anyone ever killing him, disarming him or beating him in any conflict.

No wand except the Elder Wand can repair another so no one's gonna be able to fix it

nothing stays lost forever

He made the ultimate sacrifice to preserve his people, I agree. The hero they needed, but not the one they deserved.

...

I want a book about the Department of Mysteries in the style of the SCP site with all the items they have and studied, that would be spooky

Citation?

Harry Potter wiki doesn't mention anything like this.

harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Mudblood

He should have trow it to mount doom

Not that user but while the rape thing is complete bullshit, the magical ancestor thing is true

harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Muggle-born

>Muggle-borns inherit magic from a distant ancestor; they are descended from Squibs who have married Muggles and whose families had lost the knowledge of their wizarding legacy. The magic resurfaces unexpectedly many generations later

He was probably the best Voldemort actor not gonna lie

Yea well if Rowling had any balls she would've included the rape thing. It would definitely make a lot of sense if you were a wizard to cuck as many muggles into spreading your seed as you could

He was good.

I really liked the Chamber of Secrets actor as well.

Yeah, until the liberal Ministry of Magic gets onto you and sends you to Azkaban. Not to mention SJW muggle lovers like the Weasleys will pressure for your wand to be snipped iykwim.

Is that a girl? He's such a cutie.

but he did it seven times.

The Cave scene is nine minutes of sex. A pg movie but it was so dank it's no coincidence the climax is basically a sex scene. Better than most horror films.

Say, did Voldemort create any spells besides the one that cast his faggy logo?

It was pretty good. The inferi are some of the scariest on-screen creatures I've yet to see.

He did that dark magic beam and fire snek.

the manner the scene is shot, directed and cut, sound effects/music is all brilliant

Ill add the long shot underwater after harry falls,in, that shows hundreds of them piling up and a few in the foreground is sick. Cant find it online.

Oh I remember now. One would think a wizard of his caliber would've had the knowledge and ability to develop an arsenal of spells that being unknown to his enemies would make him even more dangerous.

fire snek was fiendfyre. dumbledore uses it in the cave. voldemort can control it to do whatever he wants like dumbledore

im sure he had more spells especially ones for killing and shit but we never saw other ones he made

I know in the books it mentioned that only the best were capable of creating their own spells, and it required substantial amounts of research, but the only person that is really shown to have done it is Snape in Half-Blood Prince.

fookin' prawwwns

If leaving something in da woods means that it won't be found ever, then why didn't Voldemort just leave a horcrux in da woods?

because they need to be found to be used.

The horcruxes were just a prank bro

Honestly he left them wherever for the very reason that it could be found innawoods just as easily. [spoilers]

How does that work though. Does the inventor upload it to the magic cloud and then each wand needs a firmware update, or what?

Hi /got/ard.

others would have to learn it like a normal person would by something called the written word.

Jesus, wizards can be so muggles.

Why did he declare himself dark lord and start an all out war?

Wouldn't it be easier to just support a puppet candidate and make slow changes?

He was a psychopath. This was very obvious from the moment Dumbledore met him, so I don't know why the fuck the man took him to magic school and basically hands him every tool he needed to become an unstoppable killing machine.

Clearly the old fuck let his lust for boypussy cloud his judgment.

because he was arrogant and wouldn't be satisfied working from the shadows for very long.

I honestly wanted him to kill harry for real and still end up losing and dying himself by the combined effort of everyone else.

Both dumbs and voldemorte are victims to their own hubris.

Dumbledore thinks he is wise/influential/powerful enough to change tom.

Voldemorte does a lot of dumb shit just because he wants to act like a badass.
Ex: declaring war instead of being subtle, making horcruxes of valuable artifacts rather than random shit you'd never find.

Turns out no it was pretty easy once he got back because the ministry is a corrupt shithole. He basically does do that and sits back and slowly does things in 5 and 6 and doesn't go all out until the deathly hallows when he has the ministry completely

Voldemort does nothing for 3 and a half books and spends another sleeping in another mans bed. he sits on his as

I really disliked how they made him vaguely look like a young Hitler.

>combed hair
>white
>even white with a british accent
>young hitler

...

...

I want to see a grim, subtlety disturbing movie about the rise of moldywart. How he accumulated his vast knowledge of dark magic and the wierd, Eldritch shit he saw and found.

Are there actually people who liked the Harry Potter films without ever reading the books?

With the possible exception of the first three movies, these films were pretty shitty, and it was always shot with that grim filter.

This.

Also, dumbledore doing magic and shit.

I didn't read the books and I completely agree. After seeing the 4th movie and seeing that all the ones after had that same drab look and tone I lost interest and didn't bother with 5 onwards

i like the films way more than the books. no they werent shitty you have bad taste go watch 21 jump street and mad max

>Voldemort
>Hitler

That was actually Dumbledore's best friend, Gellert Grindelwald. His rise to power would be a MUCH better idea for something like

Fuck, meant something like

>Gellert Grindelwald (c. 1882-1998) was considered one of the most powerful Dark Wizards of all time, second only to Tom Marvolo Riddle (later known as Lord Voldemort). He was schooled at Durmstrang Institute until his expulsion. Later he fostered a friendship with Albus Dumbledore while living in Godric's Hollow for a summer with his great-aunt, Bathilda Bagshot. The two made plans to find the Deathly Hallows and wield their new-found power as Masters of Death, leading a Wizarding revolution with the aim of ending the International Statute of Secrecy and creating a benevolent global order led by wise and powerful witches and wizards that dominated Muggles. Their partnership fell apart after the two were involved in a three-way duel with Aberforth Dumbledore that resulted in Ariana Dumbledore's death.

>Grindelwald left Britain and soon stole the Elder Wand from Gregorovitch, proceeding alone with the revolution he and Dumbledore had planned. He established a power base in continental Europe at the fortress Nurmengard. Grindelwald was a complex figure, highly idealistic but marred by sociopathic tendencies and his links with the Dark Arts, a revolutionary operating outside the law. He was not a wanton killer or torturer, but he and his followers (in a single-minded and unpopular quest; one's allies must often be unsavoury characters) committed numerous crimes, including several known murders and eventually genocide. In 1945, at the height of his power, Dumbledore confronted and defeated him in a legendary duel. Grindelwald was subsequently imprisoned in his own fortress for decades, and was slain there by Voldemort in 1998 when he refused to give up information on the Elder Wand.

He was an orphan

So Voldemort was the most powerful dark wizard but most powerful wizard overall?

go to bed Voldemort

>when you genuinely dont know if youd be in gryffindor because you have most of their traits
>but you have cerebral slytherin traits like cheating or being cunning
i should be in slytherin but id probably convince the hat to out me in gryffindor

I hate modern film makers so much.

thats a poster you fuck. all films color their shit. this one in particular actually did it right and looks good on film much better than all the other recent crap, its straight kino.

a lot of those woods scenes like most of all scenes are shot on set, at leavesden, they color to their own desires and bc if you look at behind the scene footage from dh1 it looks fake

He just wanted to be a fookin legend.

Bad parenting.

>all films color their shit
Thats why I said I hate them.

>did it right and looks good on film

How can anyone be this much of a pleb. This garbage makes me feel physically sick to look at.

What does that mean? "How the colours really looked"?

Does the person who made this not know how basic film making works? No shit retard. This isn't Harry Potter as made by Lars von Trier.

Damn, that's interesting as fuck. They didn't explain a good chunk of that at all in the books iirc

Given Rowling constantly retconning HP for SJW brownie points, what are the odds that something is said about Voldemort?

Secretly transphobic? Would have voted for Trump?

get a better tv and a better copy it looks fantastic, top tier

see
yer a faggot

The Dumbledore being gay thing wasn't actually a retcon that was thrown in there for no reason, it has relevance in his backstory since he fell in love with the guy that ended up becoming Wizard Hitler.

...

I really dont understand how its possible to think it looks good. What other films do you think "look fantastic".

I dont really understand what you are trying to say? are you saying that Lars von Trier makes good looking films and they didn't try to make a good looking film? Please elaborate.

Yeah the gay vibe was there with him and Grindelwald

I hope there's a remake in the future where they can show a balance of power
all I'm told is that Voldemort and Dumbledore are powerful, and yet there wasn't ever a scale to showcase since they only fought against each other. I'm told harry is gifted since he mastered the patronus spell so young...and yet just two years later everyone could cast it. Harry needs to be a little more extraordinary desu

hes magic hitler

That kid is Stannis' son IRL

Where is HIS movie?

Yes, he created the spell that constructed him a rudimentary body for example, and a bunch of others.

>so I don't know why the fuck the man took him to magic school and basically hands him every tool he needed to become an unstoppable killing machine.

Because ti was infinitely more complicated than that you dumb cunt.

They explained it all clearly in the books, you just haven't been paying attention.

You don't "use" Horcruxes. They passively anchor you to life.

Jesus Christ I fucking hate seeing moviefags trying to dissect a series they know nothing about because the movies didn't explain shit properly.